Skip to main content

Scarcity of Ecosystem Services and Ecological Contribution of Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecological Economics and Harmonious Society
  • 721 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, the role of agriculture in the process of industrialization can be summarized into four contributions: product contribution, factor contribution, foreign currency contribution and market contribution. Historically, the importance of the four contributions was different at different stages of industrialization. At the initial industrialization stage, the primary tasks of agriculture were to feed non-agricultural population in urban areas, to accumulate funds for industrialization and to provide land and labor for industrial development. At the mid-stage of industrialization, as the proportion of agriculture in GDP and the Engel coefficient kept falling, the reliance of industry on funds and products from agriculture reduced gradually. As the demand of urban residents for industrial products was almost saturated, the countryside became an important market for industrial products, and the market contribution of agriculture increased. In the late stage of industrialization, as a bond for energy exchange between men and nature, agriculture experienced a transformation of its role with an emerging fifth contribution – ecological contribution. At a time when the “deficit financing” of men to nature severely hinders the sustainable development of human society, the focus of agriculture has shifted from purely economic significance to both economic and ecological significance. Consequently, the ecological contribution of agriculture and the importance of its ecological output has become a highlight

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dai Xingyi: Environment and Development Economics, Shanghai, Lixin Accounting Publishing House, 1995.

  2. 2.

    Pan Jiahua: Economic Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Sustainable Development, Beijing, China Renmin University Pressing Co., Ltd., 1997.

  3. 3.

    Tao Ran, Xu Zhigang, Xu Jintao, 2004, Grain for Green Program, Grain Policy and Sustainable Development., The Universities Service Centre for China Studies of The Chinese University of Hong Kong: http://www.usc.cuhk.edu.hk/wkgb.asp.

  4. 4.

    Virtual water is also known as embedded water or exogenous water. The concepts of virtual water and trading of virtual water were coined by Professor T. Allen of University of London in 1993. The amount of water resources consumed for the production of a commodity or service is known as the virtual water contained in the commodity or service. The transfer of virtual water brought by the import and export of water-intensive products is called the trading of virtual water. The two concepts provide new perspectives for studying the relations between the trade of agricultural products and the transfer of water resources.

  5. 5.

    Currently, there is no standard definition for the connotation and denotation of “ecological compensation” in the academic community. This paper argues that, as the environment has the value of resources and the value of ecological services, the broader sense of “ecological compensation” should include the compensation for stakeholders for exploiting the value of resources, and the compensation for stakeholders for improving the quality of ecological services and taking environmental protection measures. The former is also known as the compensation for the value of resources, such as the water resource fee for the exploitation of water resources and the charge for industrial pollution. The latter is also known as the compensation for the value of ecological services, such as the compensation for returning farmland into forests and the compensation for ecological immigration. In our study, the compensation for the value of ecological services is used.

References

  • Heimlich RE (2002) The U.S. experience with land retirement for natural resource conservation. Presented to forest trends-China workshop on “Forests and Ecosystem Services in China”, Beijing, China, April 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S, White A, Khare A (2004) Current status and future potential of markets for ecosystem services of tropical forests: an overview. A report prepared for the International Tropical Timber Council. Accessible with www.forest-trends.org

  • Zhang Jiaen, Rao Weimin (2004) Discussions on countermeasures for sustainable utilization of agricultural ecosystem service functions. Chin J Ecol 23(4):99–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhu Sihai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sihai, Z. (2016). Scarcity of Ecosystem Services and Ecological Contribution of Agriculture. In: Qu, F., Sun, R., Guo, Z., Yu, F. (eds) Ecological Economics and Harmonious Society. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0461-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics