Abstract
Based on an ethnographic academic-community collaboration grounded in the key tenets of the culture-centred approach, this article outlines the discursive processes, practices, and resources utilised by DDS Sangham members, an organised collective of women farmers in Telangana, India to promote millets, a marginalised crop. The story of millets voiced by the women farmers is also a story of alternative rationalities to large-scale corporatisation of Indian agriculture; instead resisting the academic-industry-policy nexus by connecting local interpretations of food value to broader logics of development, nutrition, and hunger. The women come together in interpreting food as culture, rooted in local cultural understandings of health and nutrition. The processes of collective organisation rooted in this depiction of food value and health within local cultural logics draw upon identity formation, solidarity and collaboration with a variety of local, national and global actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
PDS refers to the Indian government initiative to distribute subsidized food and non-food items, primarily targeted for the poor.
References
Basavaraj, G.P., Parthasarathy, R., Bhagavatula, S., and Ahmed, W. (2010). Availability and utilisation of pearl millet in India. SAT eJournal (ejournal.icrisat.org), 8 (December), 1–6.
Dankelman, I., and J. Davidson. 1988. Women and environment in the Third World. London: Earthscan.
DDS. (2004). A study on alternative public distribution system. Resource document. Deccan Development Society. http://www.ddsindia.com/www/PDF/dds_pds%20text.pdf. Accessed 2 January 2012.
Dutta, M. 2008. Communicating health. Polity: Cambridge.
Dutta, M. 2011. Communicating social change. New York: Routledge.
Glover, D. 2010. The corporate shaping of GM crops as a technology for the poor. Journal of Peasant Studies 37(2): 67–90.
International Food Policy Research Institute (2012). Global Hunger Index. http://www.ifpri.org/publication/2012-global-hunger-index. Accessed 1 Feb 2014.
Ivanic, M., Martin, W. (2008). Implications of higher global food prices for poverty in low-income countries. Agricultural Economics 39: 405–416 (2008). doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00347.x.
Kudlu, C., and G.D. Stone. 2013. The trials of genetically modified food: Bt eggplant and ayurvedic medicine in India. Food, Culture and Society: An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 16: 21–42.
Kurian, N.J. 2000. Widening regional disparities in India. Economic and Political Weekly 35(7): 538–550.
Larsson, D.G.J., C. de Pedro, and N. Paxeus. 2007. Effluent from drug manufactures contains extremely high levels of pharmaceuticals. Journal of Hazardous Materials 148(3): 751–755.
Lupton, D. 1994. Toward the development of critical health communication praxis. Health Communication 6(1): 55–67.
National Academy of Agriculture Sciences (2013). Role of millets in nutrional security of India. Resource document. http://naasindia.org/Policy%20Papers/Policy%2066.pdf. Accessed 5 November 2014.
Otero, G. 2012. The neoliberal food regime in Latin America: State, agribusiness transnational corporations and biotechnology. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 33(3): 282–294.
Pavarala, V., and K. Malik. 2007. Other voices: The struggle of community radio in India. New Delhi, India: Sage.
Qaim, M., and Kouser, S. (2013). Genetically modified crops and food security. Plos One 8(6): e64879 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064879.
Satheesh, P.V. 2000. Linking to community development: Using participatory approaches to in situ conservation. In Participatory approaches to conservation and use of plant genetic resources, ed. E. Friis-Hansen, and B. Sthapit, 181–187. Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.
Satheesh, P.V. (2014). Cultivating biodiversity: Peasant women in India. Resourch document. Agricultures Network. http://www.agriculturesnetwork.org/magazines/global/cultivating-diversity/acknowledging-community-values. Accessed 13 Dec 2014.
Stone, G.D. (2011). Field versus farm in Warangal: Bt cotton, higher yields, and larger questions. World Development, 39: 387–398 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.008.
Vakulabharanam, V. 2004. Agricultural growth and irrigation in Telangana. Economic and Political Weekly 39(13): 1421–1426.
Walker, K.L.M. (2008). Neoliberalism on the ground in rural India: Predatory growth, agrarian crisis, internal colonisation, and the intensification of class struggle. Journal of Peasant Studies 35(4): 557–620 (2008). http://doi.org/10.1080/03066150802681963.
Wilson, P., and M. Stewart. 2008. Global indigenous media. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thaker, J., Dutta, M. (2016). Millet in Our Own Voices: A Culturally-Centred Articulation of Alternative Development by DDS Women Farmers’ Sanghams. In: Venkateswar, S., Bandyopadhyay, S. (eds) Globalisation and the Challenges of Development in Contemporary India. Dynamics of Asian Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0454-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0454-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0453-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0454-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)