Skip to main content

From the Case of Sex Discrimination to the Ideas of Equality and Equal Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Dilemmas in Public Policy

Part of the book series: Governance and Citizenship in Asia ((GOCIA))

  • 915 Accesses

Abstract

Equal Opportunities Commission v Director of Education marks an important milestone in the history of Hong Kong’s anti-discrimination movement. Prompted by a decades-old public policy allocating secondary school places to primary six students it believed to be discriminatory against girls, the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) successfully challenged the now defunct government practice under the Sex Discrimination Ordinance (SDO). Based on this symbolic and educational decision, this chapter will begin by summarising the fact of the case, followed by an analysis of the claims in question and the meaning of sex discrimination. It will then discuss the value of equality, including its various rationales including “formal equality”, “treating like alike”, and “equal opportunities”. It will argue that, despite its universal appeal, equality as a policy justification can be both elusive and politically sensitive. Citing examples from Hong Kong and overseas jurisdictions, this chapter argues that an apparently benign anti-discrimination measure can in some cases generate difficult ethical dilemmas and controversies. Drawing on the plights of ethnic minority students in Hong Kong, this chapter will end with an observation that substantive equality requires proactive measures to help those whose existing disadvantages prevent them from competing fairly in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a related discussion of the formal concept of justice and the Aristotelian idea of “treating equals equally”, see Tsang’s chapter in this book, pp. 168–170.

  2. 2.

    Yung (Chap. 1 of this book) points out that some social values are relative and vary with time, particularly social values that rest on the social, economic, political, and technological conditions under which a particular society is situated. As the societal conditions change, this category of social values also changes, affecting our views on appropriate treatment of people of different sex and race.

  3. 3.

    Yung (Chap. 1 of this book) highlights that values, including social values, may conflict with each other on a social and policy issue. In the controversy over affirmative action and the case of SSPA system, for example, the value placed on merit and the value placed on giving extra assistance to the disadvantaged may conflict with each other.

  4. 4.

    Here, the apparent conflict between the values of religious freedom and sex equality is an example of conflict of values over a social issue as discussed by Yung in Chap. 1 of this book.

  5. 5.

    This is in line with what Yung says in Chap. 1 of this book that the kind of government and its policies are largely the product of the synergy resulted from different actors within society, including civil society. For further discussion of the importance of civic engagement, see Yu’s chapter in this book, pp. 208–211.

References

Journals and Articles

  • Cheung, S. (2011, May 19). Police give extra points for foreign languages. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, B. (1990). Discrimination and equality of opportunity—northern Irish lessons. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 10, 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W.-K. (2011, December 29). Out of touch. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y. K. (2008). Universal human dignity: Some reflections in the Asian context. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 3, 283–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D., Bank, R. J., & Van Nort, K. D. (1996). Sex discrimination in restaurant hiring: An audit study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 915–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, J. (2013, September 18). Hong Kong Unison threatens court action on racially segregated schools. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nip, A. (2010, July 25). Rejected in HK, Faiza graduated from Ivy League. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1998). Equality and priority. In A. Mason (Ed.), Ideals of equality (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, G. (1941). Slavery in Plato’s thought. Philosophical Review, 50, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westen, P. (1982). The empty idea of equality. Harvard Law Review, 95, 537–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1967). The idea of equality. In Peter Laslett & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), Philosophy, politics and society (Second Series) (pp. 110–131). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2014, January 15). Chinese as a second language to be taught to ethnic minority pupils. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

Books and Chapters

  • Aristotle, E. N. (1925). Ethica Nicomachea (W. D. Ross, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1986). A matter of principle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S. (2002). Discrimination law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. Y. K. (2010). Equality, dignity, and same-sex marriage: A rights disagreement in democratic societies. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Online Publication

Cases

  • Brown v Board of Education (1954) 347 US 483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Opportunities Commission v Director of Education (2001) 2 HKLRD 690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, decided June 24, 2013, No. 11-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggs et al v Duke Power Company (1971) 401 US 424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer v Thompson (1971) 403 US 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessy v Ferguson (1896) 163 US 537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci v DeStefano (2009) 557 US.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man Yee Karen Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, M.Y.K. (2016). From the Case of Sex Discrimination to the Ideas of Equality and Equal Opportunities. In: Yung, B., Kam Por, Y. (eds) Ethical Dilemmas in Public Policy. Governance and Citizenship in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0437-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0437-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0435-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0437-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics