Abstract
Since the goods-and-services tax (GST) is a consumption tax, those with the same level of consumption will need to pay the same amount of GST, regardless how rich they are. To tax people according to their levels of consumption is to treat unequals (rich and poor with the same level of consumption) equally, thus unjust according to Aristotelian conception of justice. The GST reform intended primarily to broaden the tax base, yet to the detriment of tax justice, involving great administrative cost and discouraging consumption generally should not be an early step to take. Other more just and viable alternatives to GST should more justifiably be implemented before any discussion of the introduction of GST should be seriously considered. The issue of tax justice cannot be assessed by merely considering one specific tax, but must be evaluated in the context of other taxes in the tax system. From a broader perspective, justice in a tax system should not be isolated from how the tax revenue is to be used by the government. Justice, as a social value in public policy, is an indispensible consideration in the design of any tax system. Yet, it is far from the only one. In fact, there may be trade-offs among justice and other important considerations in tax design which leads to tax policy dilemmas. A delicate balance should be maintained among various conflicting considerations as a way out of such dilemmas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The CSSA household will receive a supplement equals to estimated GST. There will be a $500 GST credit for water and sewage charges per household and a $3000 credit for rates per household. The low-income households will receive a GST allowance of $2000 per year (The Hong Kong Government of the SAR 2006).
- 2.
- 3.
This is an example of what Yung (Chap. 1 of this book) points out that there may be clashes of values in a public policy.
- 4.
This is an example of clashes of goals and values in public policy highlighted by Yung (Chap. 1 of this book).
- 5.
Structural budgetary deficit exists when there are underlying structural imbalances between government revenue and expenditure, regardless of the developments of business cycles.
- 6.
Cyclical budgetary deficit is related to business cycles. It occurs when the government is having a deficit budget in periods during which the economy is experiencing contractions during business cycles.
- 7.
During the six years from 1998–99, some $200 billion of the fiscal reserves was used up (Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau 2014).
- 8.
Elderly dependency ratio is the ratio of those aged 65 and above to those aged 15–64.
- 9.
Balance is necessary when multiple factors have to be taken into consideration. See Yu’s chapter for a discussion of multiple values and ways to handle multiple values. What Yung calls “broader perspective” (p. 183, p. 190) is a perspective that takes more relevant factors or values into consideration.
- 10.
For a detailed discussion of healthcare financing, please refer to Shae’s chapter (Chap. 9 of this book).
References
Aristotle. (1998). The Nicomachean ethics, book V (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauhinia Foundation Research Centre. (2008). A tax base to enhance the business environment. http://www.bauhinia.org/publications/TaxStudy_Report.pdf. Accessed Oct 4, 2010.
Census and Statistics Department. (2007). Press Release July 16, 2007. http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200707/16/P200707160137.htm. Accessed November 4, 2010.
Financial Secretary. (2013). The 2013–14 budget: budget speech. http://www.budget.gov.hk/2013/eng/speech.html. Accessed March 22, 2013.
Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau. (2014). Report of the working group on long-term financial planning. http://www.fstb.gov.hk/tb/en/report-of-the-working-group-on-longterm-fiscal-planning.htm. Accessed March 14, 2014.
Hite, P. A., & Roberts, M. L. (1992). An analysis of tax reform based on taxpayers’ perceptions of fairness and self-interest. In J. J. Stern (Ed.), Advances in taxation (pp. 115–137). London: Jai Press.
Information Services Department. (2010). Hong Kong Yearbook 2010. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
Littlewood, M. (2010). Taxation without representation. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Marx, K. (1959). Critique of the gotha programme and a contribution to the critique of the social democratic draft programme of 1981. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Mccaffery, E. J. (2002). Fair not flat: How to make the tax system better and simpler. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, L., & Nagel, T. (2002). The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
OECD Tax Database. http://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/tax-database.htm. Accessed August 1, 2015.
OECDiLibrary. (2011). Government at a glance 2011 http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/gov_glance-2011-en/03/04/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/gov_glance-2011–10-en. Accessed August 1, 2015.
Pasquariello, R. D. (1985). Tax justice. Lanham: University Press of Amercia.
Slemrod, J., & Bakija, J. (2008). Taxing ourselves: A citizen’s guide to the debate over taxes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sugin, L. (2004). Theories of distributive justice and limitations of taxation: What rawls demands from tax systems. Fordham Law Review, 72, 1991–2014.
The Hong Kong Government of the SAR. (2006). Broadening the tax base: ensuring our future prosperity. http://www.taxreform.gov.hk/eng/doc_and_leaflet.htm. Accessed October 4, 2010.
The Hong Kong Government of the SAR. (2007). Public consultation on tax reform: Final report. http://www.taxreform.gov.hk/eng/pdf/finalreport.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2010.
Wong, W., & Luk, S. (2007). Economic policy. In W. M. Lam, L. T. Percy, W. Wong, & I. Holliday (Eds.), Contemporary Hong Kong politics: Governance in the post-1997 Era (pp. 181–204). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Yung, B. (2008). Hong Kong’s housing policy: A case study in social justice. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yung, B. (2016). Justice and Taxation: From GST to Hong Kong Tax System. In: Yung, B., Kam Por, Y. (eds) Ethical Dilemmas in Public Policy. Governance and Citizenship in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0437-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0437-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0435-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0437-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)