Advertisement

The Fourth Validation Study: A Qualitative Examination of the Attitudes of Liberal Studies (LS) Markers Towards Onscreen Marking in Hong Kong

  • David Coniam
  • Peter Falvey
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes a qualitative study of the attitudes of Liberal Studies’ markers towards OSM carried out in 2009 – before the subject became a compulsory subject in Hong Kong’s new senior secondary school curriculum and when the candidature was much smaller at 3300. This qualitative validation study describes semi-structured interviews with Liberal Studies markers who provided in-depth opinions on key aspects of the OSM process. Markers were positive about many aspects of the new system, including: the advantages of marking by single question rather than by whole paper; improved reliability using control scripts; and relief from administrative tasks associated with PBM. There were, nonetheless, aspects of the new system that markers were unhappy with, primarily logistical, involving travel to marking centres and marking at fixed times when they were tired. Reading onscreen was also an issue. In summary, 43 % of markers stated that they preferred the status quo of PBM, 35 % stated they felt OSM was better, while 21 % were ambivalent. While OSM in 2009 had not yet been wholeheartedly accepted by markers, its potential advantages were beginning to be appreciated.

Keywords

Liberal Study Question Number Control Script International English Language Test System Mass Transit Railway 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Coniam, D. (2009). A comparison of onscreen and paper-based marking in the Hong Kong public examination system. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coniam, D. (2011). A qualitative examination of the attitudes of liberal studies markers towards onscreen marking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 1042–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretative theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, M., & Nádas, R. (2009). Marginalised behaviour: Digital annotations, spatial encoding and the implications for reading comprehension. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(4), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Tang, H. L., & Tse, W. (2009). Liberal studies, liberal interpretations. Varsity, 112, 4–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Coniam
    • 1
  • Peter Falvey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and InstructionThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong

Personalised recommendations