Abstract
The past decade has seen important progress in specifying how assessment of learning can be designed and implemented to support the process of learning, with individual scholars and colloquia producing comprehensive, well-grounded guidelines for reforming assessment in higher education systems. At the same time, numerous national initiatives have addressed demands to assure the quality of graduates by focusing on the specification of program-level learning outcome standards that apply to all graduates in a discipline, regardless of their place of study. The OECD’s Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) project is a logical international extension of these initiatives. However, assuring the quality of graduate learning outcomes through appropriate assessment regimes presents a major challenge to most higher education systems. Much work remains to be done in developing appropriate approaches to assessment and implementing these approaches in complex educational systems where effecting changes to established practices is extremely challenging.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2000). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
Assessment Standards Knowledge Exchange. (2009). Assessment standards: A manifesto for change. Retrieved from http://www.brookes.ac.uk/aske/documents/ManifestoLeafletNew.pdf
Australian Learning and Teaching Council. (2010). Learning and teaching academic standards statement for accounting. Strawberry Hills, Australia: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian qualifications framework (2nd ed.). Adelaide, Australia: Australian Qualifications Framework Council.
Biggs, J. B., & Tang, K. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
Boud, D. (2009). How can practice reshape assessment? In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Assessment-2020_propositions_final.pdf
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.
Carless, D., Joughin, G., Lui, F., & Associates. (2006). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Mok, M. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: Principles and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 395–398.
Dooley, K. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1(1), 69–97.
Ewell, P. T. (2013). The Lumina Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP): Implications for assessment. Champaign, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. Retrieved from http://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/documents/EwellDQPop1.pdf
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004–2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Hattie, J. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Henry, R., Marshall, S., & Ramburuth, P. (Eds.). (2013). Improving assessment in higher education: A whole-of-institution approach. Sydney, Australia: UNSW Press.
Higher Education Standards Panel. (2013). Draft standards for learning outcomes (Coursework) 2013. Retrieved from http://www.hestandards.gov.au/sites/default/files/HESDraftStandardsforLearningOutcomes%28Coursework%29-March2013.pdf
Hong Kong Polytechnic University. (2012, June). Learning outcomes for PolyU graduates at undergraduate degree level: Policy and guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.polyu.edu.hk/obe/institutional_policies/Learning_Outcomes_for_PolyU_Graduates_at_Undergraduate_Degree_Level.pdf
Hughes, C., & Barrie, S. (2010). Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 325–334.
Institute for Teaching and Learning, The University of Sydney. (2012a). Assessing and assuring graduate learning outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/aaglo/
Institute for Teaching and Learning, The University of Sydney. (2012b). AAGLO summary 7: Characteristics of tasks effective in the assessment of GLOs. Retrieved from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/aaglo/pdf/AAGLO%20Summary%207%20Assessment%20tasks_Final.pdf
Institute for Teaching and Learning, The University of Sydney. (2012c). AAGLO summary 9: Whole-of-program approaches to assessment planning. Retrieved from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/aaglo/pdf/AAGLO%20Summary%209%20Whole%20of%20Prog_Final.pdf
Joughin, G. (2009). Introduction: Refocusing assessment. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 1–11). London: Springer.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.
Lumina Foundation for Education. (2011). The degree qualifications profile. Retrieved from http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/The_Degree_Qualifications_Profile.pdf
Macdonald, R., & Joughin, G. (2009). Changing assessment in higher education: A model in support of institution-wide improvement. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 193–213). London: Springer.
Ng, C. (2016). Crafting an intrinsically motivating course environment for language learning: A Japanese pedagogical innovation. In C. Ng, B. Fox, & M. Nakano (Eds.), Reforming learning and teaching in Asia-Pacific universities (pp. 275–296). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
OECD. (2013). AHELO reports and documents. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/ahelodocuments.htm
Poon, A. Y. K. (2016). A global challenge: Overseas immersion as an effective means to enhancing English proficiency? In C. Ng, B. Fox, & M. Nakano (Eds.), Reforming learning and teaching in Asia-Pacific universities (pp. 249–273). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Price, M., Carroll, J., O’Donovan, B., & Rust, C. (2011). If I was going there I wouldn’t start from here: A critical commentary on current assessment practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 479–492.
Price, M., O’Donovan, B., Rust, C., & Carroll, J. (2008). Assessment standards: A manifesto for change. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2(3). Retrieved from http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/assessment_standards_a_manifesto_for_change
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 5(35), 535–550.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2008). Subject benchmark statement: Social work. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Social-work.pdf
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2014). UK quality code for higher education part A: Setting and maintaining academic standards: The frameworks for higher education qualifications of UK degree-awarding bodies. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/qualifications-frameworks.pdf
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (n.d.). The UK quality code for higher education subject benchmark statements. Retrieved from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/assuring-standards-and-quality/the-quality-code/subject-benchmark-statements
Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/home.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Joughin, G., Hughes, C. (2016). Reforming Assessment to Promote Learning: Critical Issues from a Global Perspective. In: Ng, Ch., Fox, R., Nakano, M. (eds) Reforming Learning and Teaching in Asia-Pacific Universities. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 33. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0431-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0431-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0429-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0431-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)