Abstract
The assessment of soil total carbon (TC) across large land areas is critical to derive global and regional soil carbon budgets and better understand the interactions between carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. But the cost and time involved in measurements of TC with standard laboratory methods are impractical. Research has suggested that visible/near-infrared (VNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy can provide robust and accurate estimations for TC. The applicability, transfer, and scalability of VNIR-derived soil models are still poorly understood. The objectives of this study in Florida, USA, were to (i) compare two methods to predict soil TC using five fields (local scale) and a pooled (regional scale) VNIR spectral dataset, (ii) assess the model’s transferability among fields, and (iii) evaluate the up- and downscaling behavior of TC prediction models. A total of 560 TC-spectral sets were modeled by partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine (SVM). The transferability and up- and downscaling of models were limited by the following factors: (i) the spectral data domain, (ii) soil attribute domain, (iii) methods that describe the internal model structure of VNIR-TC relationships, and (iv) environmental domain space of attributes that control soil carbon dynamics. All soil logTC models showed excellent performance based on both methods (PLSR and SVM) with R 2 > 0.86, bias < 0.01 %, root-mean-square prediction error (RMSE) = 0.09 %, residual predication deviation (RPD) > 2.70 %, and ratio of prediction error to inter-quartile range (RPIQ) > 4.54. PLSR performed substantially better than SVM to scale and transfer models. Upscaled soil TC models performed somewhat better in terms of model fit (R 2), RPD, and RPIQ, whereas downscaled models showed less bias and smaller RMSE based on PLSR. But no universal trend was found indicating which of the four investigated factors (i–iv) had the most impact that constraints transferability and scalability. The findings from this study have implications for the development of ‘universal’ spectral-based soil models aiming to predict soil properties for a diverse set of different soils formed in different environmental conditions covering a wide range of geographic settings, at its extreme the whole globe. Those ‘universal’ spectral libraries are based on the premise that soil predictions (e.g., soil TC) can be made anyplace because they are built using soil spectral datasets that characterize exhaustively the attribute feature space. This assertion is limited by the fact that a large number of interacting factors of soils, spectra, and environmental properties are needed to represent the exhaustive sample population which has not materialized yet. Given the many factors that can impinge on empirically derived soil spectral prediction models, as demonstrated by this study, more focus on the applicability and scaling of them is needed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bellon-Maurel V, Fernandez-Ahumada E, Palagos B, Roger JM, McBratney AB (2010) Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy. TrAC Trend. Anal. Chem. 29(9): 1073-1081.
Blöschl G., Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review. Hydrol. Process. 9(3-4): 251-290.
Brown DJ, Bricklemyer RS, Miller PR (2005) Validation requirements for diffuse reflectance soil characterization models with a case study of VNIR soil C prediction in Montana. Geoderma 129 (3-4): 251-267.
Clark RN (1999) Spectroscopy of rocks and minerals, and principles of spectroscopy. p. 3-58. In Rencz, A.N. (ed.), Manual of remote sensing, Vol. 3, remote sensing for the earth science. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
Davies AMC, Fearn T (2006). Back to basics: calibration statistics. Spectrosc. Eur. 18: 31-32.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, FFWCC (2003) Florida vegetation and land cover data derived from Landsat ETM + imagery. Available at: http://myfwc.com/research/gis/data-maps/terrestrial/fl-vegetation-land-cover/.
Galvao LS, Vitorello I (1998) Role of organic matter in obliterating the effects of iron on spectral reflectance and colour of Brazilian tropical soils. Int. J. Remote Sens. 19(10): 1969-1979.
Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4): 857-871.
Grunwald S, Thompson JA, Boettinger JL (2011) Digital soil mapping and modeling at continental scales: finding solutions for global issues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75(4): 1201-1213.
Hernández N, Kiralj R, Ferreira MMC, Talavera I (2009) Critical comparative analysis, validation and interpretation of Support Vector Machine and Partial Least Square Regression models in a QSAR study on HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 98(1): 65-77.
Hook PB, Burke IC (2000) Biogeochemistry in a shortgrass landscape: control by topography, soil texture, and microclimate. Ecology 81(10): 2686-2703.
John B, Yamashita T, Ludwig B, Flessa H (2005) Storage of organic carbon in aggregate and density fractions of silty soils under different types of land use. Geoderma 128(1-2): 63-79.
Lagacherie P, Baret F, Feret JB, Madeira Netto J, Robbez-Masson JM (2008) Estimation of soil clay and calcium carbonate using laboratory, field and airborne hyperspectral measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 112(3): 825-835.
Lark RM (2011) Spatially nested sampling schemes for spatial variance components: Scope for their optimization. Comput. Geosci. 37(10): 1633-1641.
Mallavan BP, Minasny B, McBratney AB (2010) Homosoil, a methodology for quantitative extrapolation of soil information across the globe. p. 137–150. In Boettinger, D.J.L., Howell, D.W., Moore, A.C., Hartemink, P.D.A.E., Kienast-Brown, S. (eds.), Digital soil mapping. Progress in soil science. Springer, The Netherlands.
Martens H, Næs T (1989) Multivariate calibration. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons.
McBratney AB (1998) Some considerations on methods for spatially aggregating and disaggregating soil information. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 50(1): 51-62.
McDowell ML, Bruland GL, Deenik JL, Grunwald S (2012a) Effects of subsetting by carbon content, soil order, and spectral classification on prediction of soil total carbon with diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012. Available at http://www.hindawi.com/journals/aess/2012/294121/abs/.
McDowell ML, Bruland GL, Deenik JL, Grunwald S, Knox NM (2012b) Soil total carbon analysis in Hawaiian soils with visible, near-infrared and mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 189-190(0): 312-320.
Minasny B, McBratney AB (2008) Regression rules as a tool for predicting soil properties from infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 94(1): 72-79.
Minasny B, Tranter G, McBratney AB, Brough DM, Murphy BW (2009) Regional transferability of mid-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopic prediction for soil chemical properties. Geoderma 153(1-2): 155-162.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA (2009). Soil survey geographic database (SSURGO). Available at: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/.
Nocita M, Kooistra L, Bachmann M, Müller A, Powell M, Weel S (2011) Predictions of soil surface and topsoil organic carbon content through the use of laboratory and field spectroscopy in the Albany Thicket Biome of Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Geoderma 167-168(0): 295-302.
Sarkhot DV, Grunwald S., Ge Y, Morgan CLM (2011) Comparison and detection of total and available soil carbon fractions using visible/near infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 164(1-2): 22-32.
Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36(8): 1627-1639.
Thissen U, Pepers M, Üstün B, Melssen WJ, Buydens LMC (2004) Comparing Support Vector Machines to Partial Least Square Regression for spectral regression applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 73(2): 169-179.
United States Geological Survey, USGS (1999) National Elevation Dataset (NED). Available at: http://ned.usgs.gov/.
Vapnik V (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory. Second. Springer, New York, USA.
Vasques GM, Grunwald S, Harris WG (2010) Spectroscopic models of soil organic carbon in Florida, USA. J. Environ. Qual. 39(3): 923-934.
Vasques GM, Grunwald S, Myers DB (2012a) Influence of the spatial extent and resolution of input data on soil carbon models in Florida, USA. J. Geohys. Res.: Biogeosci. 117(G4): 1-12.
Vasques GM, Grunwald S, Myers DB (2012b) Associations between soil carbon and ecological landscape variables at escalating spatial scales in Florida, USA. Landscape Ecol. 27(3): 355-367.
Vasques GM, Grunwald S, Sickman JO (2008) Comparison of multivariate methods for inferential modeling of soil carbon using visible/near-infrared spectra. Geoderma 146(1-2): 14-25.
Vasques GM, Grunwald S, Sickman JO (2009) Modeling of soil organic carbon fractions using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73(1): 176-184.
Viscarra Rossel RA, Walvoort DJJ, McBratney AB, Janik LJ, Skjemstad JO (2006) Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma 131(1-2): 59-75.
Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
Williams P (1987) Variables affecting near-infrared reflectance spectroscopic analysis. p. 143–167. In Near-infrared technology in the agricultural and food industries. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (Eds) (2006) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology: methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Xiong X (2013) Geo-spatial Modeling of soil organic carbon and its uncertainty. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Yimer F, Ledin S. Abdelkadir A (2006) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks as affected by topographic aspect and vegetation in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia. Geoderma 135: 335-344.
Acknowledgements
We thank the technical staff members of the Environmental Pedology Laboratory, Soil and Water Science Department for assistance with the soil carbon analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yu, C., Grunwald, S., Xiong, X. (2016). Transferability and Scaling of VNIR Prediction Models for Soil Total Carbon in Florida. In: Zhang, GL., Brus, D., Liu, F., Song, XD., Lagacherie, P. (eds) Digital Soil Mapping Across Paradigms, Scales and Boundaries. Springer Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0415-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0415-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0414-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0415-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)