Advertisement

Augmenting the Performance of Multi-patient Parameter Monitoring System in LKSVM

  • S. Premanand
  • S. Sugunavathy
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

To offer quality wellness care to patients, multi-parameter patient monitors (MPM) need a high accuracy for sensitivity, specificity, and overall classification. Nevertheless, it is likewise important to provide affordable healthcare by providing cheap MPMs using todays handheld computing and communication devices, and low complexity hardware. Support vector machine (SVM) is a vital classification process valuable for the improvement of MPMs for its high exactness and viability in foreseeing the status of patients. It is well known that non-linear kernel SVMs offer better performance, while the linear kernel SVM (LKSVM) are computationally very efficient. This makes the LKSVM particularly attractive for low cost implementations. In this paper, we demonstrate that mapping feature to a higher dimension using locality-constrained linear coding (LLC), added to that the framework by eluding the system reliant features using dimensionality reduction technique called principal component analysis (PCA) to make the framework durable, which improve the execution of MPMs using LKSVM. It was seen that the use of LLC-PCA has helped enhance the sensitivity by 3.27 % from the baseline system.

Keywords

Multi-parameter patient monitor Support vector machine Locality-constrained linear coding Principal component analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    National Patient Safety Association (2007) Safer care for acutely ill patients: learning from serious accidents. Tech Rep (NPSA)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clifton L, Clifton, DA, Watkinson PJ, Tarassenko L (2011) Identification of patient deterioration in vital-sign data using one-class support vector machines. In: Federated conference on computer science and information systems (Fed-CSIS) (Szczecin, Poland). IEEE, pp 125–131Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khalid S, Clifton DA, Clifton L, Tarassenko L (2012) A two-class approach to the detection of physiological deterioration in patient vital signs, with clinical label refinement. In: IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine, vol 16, no 6, pp 1231–1238Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J (2006) Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognitionGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jianchao Y, Yu K, Gong Y, Huang T (2009) Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse coding for image classification. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Miami, FL, USA, pp 1794–1801Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee H, Battle A, Raina R, Ng AY (2007) Efficient sparse coding algorithms. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 19, p 801Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kai Y, Zhang T, Gong Y (2009) Nonlinear learning using local coordinate coding. NIPS 9:1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang J, Yang J, Yu K, Lv F, Huang T, Gong Y (2010) Locality-constrained linear coding for image classification. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 3360–3367Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taniguchi K, Han XH, Iwamoto Y, Sasatani S, Chen YW (2012) Image super-resolution based on locality-constrained linear coding. In: 21st IEEE international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), pp 1948–1951Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang P, Wee CY, Niethammer M, Shen D, Yap PT (2013) Large deformation image classification using generalized locality-constrained linear coding. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI 2013), pp 292–299Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyvärinen L (1970) Principal component analysis, mathematical modeling for industrial processes. Springer, Berlin, pp 82–104Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moore B (1981) Principle component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability, and model reduction. In: Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions, pp 17–32, Feb 1981Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim KI (2002) Face recognition using kernel principle component analysis. IEEE Sig Process Lett 9(2):40–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soman KP, Loganathan R, Ajay V (2009) Machine learning with SVM and other kernel methods. Prentice Hall India Learning Private Ltd., New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholkopf B, Smola AJ (2001) Learningwith kernels—support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vapnik VN, Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PCH, Mark RG, Mietus JE, Moody GB, Peng CK, Stanley HE (2000) Physio Bank, Physio Toolkit and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101(23):215–220Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee J, Scott D, Villarroel M, Clifford G, Saeed M, Mark R (2011) Open-access MIMIC-II database for intensive care research. In: 33rd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, pp 8315–8318, Sept 2011Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang C-C, Lin C (2011) LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM T Intell Syst Technol 2(3):27:1–27:27Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarassenko L, Clifton DA, Pinsky MR, Hravnak MT, Woods JR, Watkinson PJ (2011) Centile-based early warning scores derived from statistical distributions of vital signs. Resuscitation 82(8):1013–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gray RM (1984) Vector quantization. IEEE ASSP Magazine, pp 4–29, Apr 1984Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linde Y, Buzo A, Gray RM (1980) An algorithm for vector quantizer design. In: IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp 702–710, Jan 1980Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringAmrita School of EngineeringEttimadai, CoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringDr. Mahalingam College of Engineering and TechnologyPollachiIndia

Personalised recommendations