Teaching Effectiveness Enhancement Project “TEEP”

  • Riadh Besbes
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)


The overall objective, to which the project will contribute, is to improve teaching and learning effectiveness within academic institutions by exploiting data mining methods on collected databases for educational knowledge extraction. These teaching and learning databases are accumulated from quantitative “measures” done through indoor classroom visits within academic institutions, online web access learners’ questionnaires answers, paper written statements’ analysis of academic exams in STEM education (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), and online elementary grades seizure from written traces of learners’ performances within STEM exams. Findings of these processes, elaborated by researcher’s team within beneficiary organization, are disseminated through diversified publication and are the subject of multiple professional meetings, especially, teachers training sessions. The project’s data mining strategy in educational context will support and develop teachers’ expertise, enhance and scaffold students’ learning, and improve and raise education system’s performance. This is a project that combines data mining analysis methods with educational and cognitive science findings. It attempts to unify these two paradigms generally distant from each other. New strategies of educational assessment, training, and innovating are designed and are able to enhance significantly the effectiveness of teaching and learning performances in academic institutions such as secondary schools. The use of these methods aims to identify and better understand the learner’s profiles, teaching practices’ characteristics, and context details in which teachers and learners act. These tools for decision support are exploited by the researcher, an educational inspector, and expert in educational assessment, to generate, make available, and process databases on teaching practices, learning performances, and learners’ profiles.


Teaching effectiveness Teachers’ practices Educational relevance Sustainability 



I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Professor Mohamed JEMNI, Director of ICT in The Arab League Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organization—ALECSO, who convincingly provided assistance that enhanced the quality of this work.


  1. Chen F.-S., Chang T.-C., & Liao H.-H. (2000). The application of the gray relation analysis on teacher appraisal. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (vol. 5, pp. 3366–3371).Google Scholar
  2. Chen C. M., Chen Y. Y., & Liu C. Y. (2007) Learning performance assessment approach using web-based learning portfolios for e-learning systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews 37(6).Google Scholar
  3. Clot, Y. (2004). Travail et sens du travail. In Falzon P. (Ed) Ergonomie (pp. 317–331). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  4. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and teacher education, 16, 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dejours C. (1993). Intelligence pratique et sagesse pratique, deux dimensions méconnues du travail réel. Education Permanente 116, 47.Google Scholar
  6. Dunham, M. H. (2002). Data mining: Introductory and advanced topics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Lafortune, L., & Allal, L. (2008). Jugement professionnel en évaluation,” collection éducation-Intervention (p. 22). Presses de l’université du Quebec.Google Scholar
  8. Leplat, J. (2001). L’analyse du travail en psychologie ergonomique. Toulouse: Octarès Editions.Google Scholar
  9. OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: “What makes a school successful?” resources, policies and practices (Volume IV).Google Scholar
  10. OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 Results: “What students know and can do—student performance in reading,” Mathematics and Science (Volume I).Google Scholar
  11. Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). The experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Laboratory of Technologies of Information and Communication and Electrical Engineering (LaTICE)TunisTunisia

Personalised recommendations