Skip to main content

Pedagogical Reasoning in Teacher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Teacher Education

Abstract

The foundations on which teaching is constructed hint at ways of thinking and knowing that shape pedagogy and illustrate why simplistic notions of teaching as telling and learning as listening do not suffice (Loughran, Curric Inq 43(1):118–141, 2013). As a consequence, teaching is perhaps best understood as being problematic because it exists in what Schön (The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action.Basic Books, New York, 1983) described as the swampy lowlands where important but messy problems exist that cannot be simply resolved or technically managed. Teachers work with uncertainty in an ‘indeterminate zone of practice’ (Schön DA, Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1987) in which professional knowledge develops in response to, and is informed by, the context. In exploring the uncertainty inherent in navigating the swampy lowlands of practice, pedagogical reasoning – the scaffolding that supports the sophisticated business of professional practice –comes into sharp focus. Understanding pedagogical reasoning, how it develops and the manner in which it influences practice is important. Making that clear for others, especially students of teaching, is a challenge that should not be eschewed in teacher education programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Throughout the literature, educational reform is a term often associated with times in which political imperatives lead to questioning about the ‘quality’ and/or ‘standards’ of teaching and teacher education. In such times, it is typical for teaching/teacher education to be viewed as a technical skill to be mastered so that the correct content can be delivered in the best way to maximize outcomes. In recent times, international testing has led to an increased focus on teacher education as the ‘cause’ of many issues with schooling and student success (or otherwise). Calls for ‘reform’ thus abound and are conveniently distanced from, or ignorant of, arguments about the shortcomings of education as a system by scholars such as Sarason (1990, 1996).

References

  • Aubusson, P., & Schuck, S. (2006). Researching and learning from our practices. In P. Aubusson & S. Schuck (Eds.), Teacher learning and development: The mirror maze (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R. (1990). Individual and group reflection as a basis for teacher development. In P. Hughes (Ed.), Teachers’ professional development. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1992). The significance of teachers’ frames for teaching. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 9–32). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2(2), 131–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2001, September). Making the private public: Using the WWW as a window into one teacher educator’s thinking about her practice. Paper presented at the International Study Association of Teachers and Teaching Conference, Faro, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2004). Making the private public: Giving preservice teachers access to their teacher educators’ thinking via an electronic journal. Didaktisk Tidskrift: För practiker och forskare (Nordic Journal of Teaching and Learning: For practitioners and researchers), 14(1), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in teaching about teaching: Understanding practice as a teacher educator. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C. W. (1994). Think-aloud methods in chemistry education: Understanding student thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(3), 184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. M. (2009). Learning to think like a teacher educator: Making the substantive and syntactic structures of teaching explicit through self-study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, S. M. (2011). Inside teacher education: Challenging prior views of teaching and learning. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, C. A., Salinas, A., Mahotiere, M., Lee, O., & Secada, W. G. (2013). Leveraging cultural resources through teacher pedagogical reasoning: Elementary grade teachers analyze second language learners’ science problem solving. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 32, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1993). The contribution of research on teacher thinking to the professional development of teachers. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. M. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: Understanding professional development (pp. 11–18). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, I., & Lindblad, S. (1991). On teachers’ practical reasoning and professional knowledge: Considering conceptions of context in teachers’ thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(5/6), 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chak, A. (2006). Reflecting on the self: An experience in a preschool. Reflective Practice, 7(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. (1995). Still learning to teach. In T. Russell & F. A. J. Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers (pp. 25–31). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(4), 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1995). Professional development in practicum settings: Reflective practice under scrutiny. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clift, R., Houston, W., & Pugach, M. (Eds.). (1990). Encouraging reflective practice in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Seely Brown, J., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Keast, S. (2008). Linking the goals of teacher education with the challenges of teaching preservice teachers. Paper presented at the the seventh international conference on self-study of teacher education practices pathways to change in teacher education: Dialogue, diversity and self-study, Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Keast, S. (2009). Beyond belief: Developing science teacher education. Issues [P], 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. J., Meijer, P. C., & Broeckmans, J. (Eds.). (2013). From teacher thinking to teachers and teaching: The evolution of a research community. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, A., & Berry, A. (2007). Teaching prospective teachers about learning to think like a teacher: Articulating our principles of practice. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education (pp. 31–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. L. (2007). Understanding pedagogical reasoning in history teaching through the case of cultivating historical empathy. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(4), 592–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Building a profession of teaching: Teacher educators as change agents. In M. Ben-Peretz, S. Kleeman, R. Reichenberg, & S. Shimoni (Eds.), Teacher educators as members of an evolving profession (pp. 87–102). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In C. A. McMurry (Ed.), The relation of theory to practice in the education of teachers (Third yearbook of the national society for the scientific study of education, part 1, pp. 9–30). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. B. (1996). Pedagogical reasoning: Understanding teacher decision making in a cognitive apprenticeship setting. Literacy, Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 37–49). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibboney, R. (1990). The killing field of reform. Uunpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeke, J. L. (2008). A preliminary investigation of prospective teachers’ reasoning about case studies with expert commentary. Teacher Education and Special Education, 31(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmett, P. P., & MacKinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 385–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, K., Hamilton, M. L., Pinnegar, S., & Placier, M. (1995). Becoming teachers of teachers: The paths of four beginners. In T. Russell & F. A. J. Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education (pp. 35–55). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G. F. (2000). Using a reflective framework to study teaching-learning relationships. Reflective Practice, 1(2), 165–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G. F. (2007). Using slowmation to engage preservice elementary teachers in understanding science content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, G., Loughran, J., & Nielsen, W. (2011). Slowmation: Preservice elementary teachers presenting science knowledge through creating multimodal digital animations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 985–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative science reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, M. C., & Scharmann, L. C. (2007). Using analogies to improve the teaching performance of preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, S., & Cooper, R. (2010, July). Teaching about learning to teach science to learn about teaching teachers. Paper presented at the 2nd World Congress of the International Council of Associations of Science Education, Estonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, S., & Cooper, R. (2012). Articulating our values to develop our pedagogy of teacher education. In S. Bullock & T. Russell (Eds.), Self-studies of science teacher education practices (Self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, pp. 65–84). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, S., Cooper, R., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Hoban, G. (2008, July). Slowmation as pedagogical tool for improving science learning. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), annual conference, Brisbane, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, S., Cooper, R., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Hoban, G. (2010). Slowmation as a pedagogical scaffold for improving science teaching and learning. Brunei International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., Loughran, J., & Lunenberg, M. (2005). Teaching teachers-studies into the expertise of teacher educators: An introduction to this theme issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (1995). Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J., with, Kessels, J., Koster, B., Langerwarf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Malhwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosnick, C. (2007). Still the same yet different: Enduring values and commitments in my work as a teacher and teacher educator. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education: Values, relationships and practices (pp. 16–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2000). On the nature of teaching and teacher education: Difficult practices that look easy. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 228–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (1991, April). Case studies of two teachers in a reflective teacher education program: “How do you know?”. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (1995). Practicing what I preach: Modelling reflective practice to student teachers. Research in Science Education, 25(4), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J. (2013). Pedagogy: Making sense of the complex relationship between teaching and learning. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 118–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J., & Berry, A. (2005). Modelling by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. J., & Berry, A. (2006). Looking into practice: Cases of science teaching and learning. Clayton, Australia: Monash Print Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, A. M. (1989, April). Reflection in a science teaching practicum. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, I. J. (2002). Learning from teacher research for teacher research. In J. J. Loughran, I. J. Mitchell, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Learning from teacher research (pp. 249–266). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J., & Marland, P. (1989). Research on teacher thinking: The next phase. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(2), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1994). The authority of experience in learning to teach: Messages from a physics method class. Journal of Teacher Education, 4(2), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C. B. (2002). Can self-study challenge the belief that telling, showing and guided practice constitute adequate teacher education? In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 130–142). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, C. (1997). Learning to teach prospective teachers to teach mathematics: Struggles of a beginning teacher educator. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 95–116). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, P. (2009). From lesson plan to new comprehension: Exploring student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning in learning about teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northfield, J. R., & Gunstone, R. F. (1997). Teacher education as a process of developing teacher knowledge. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 48–56). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Primary pre-service teachers’ pedagogical reasoning skills. Research in Science Education, 22(1), 323–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1995). Developing preservice teachers’ pedagogical reasoning ability. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning to teach primary science through problem-based learning. Science Education, 82(2), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. R. (1992). The influence of prior experiences on pedagogical constructs of traditional and nontraditional preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(3), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., Salmon, M. H., & Zeitz, C. M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richert, A. (1992). The content of student teachers’ reflections with different structures for facilitating the reflective process. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching: From classroom to reflection (pp. 171–191). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risko, V. J., Vukelich, C., & Roskos, K. (2009). Detailing reflection instruction: The efficacy of a guided instructional procedure on prospective teachers’ pedagogical reasoning. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. K. (2007). Forging a pedagogy of teacher education: The challenges of moving from classroom teacher to teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 3(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaen, C. L., & Wilson, S. M. (1995). Making teacher education problematic: Using cases to prepare teacher educators. Teaching Education, 7(1), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (1999). The challenge of change in teaching and teacher education. In J. R. Baird (Ed.), Reflecting, teaching, learning: Perspectives on educational improvement (pp. 219–238). Cheltenham, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. (2007). Self-study and the power of seeing teacher education as a discipline (Intercollege research authority, year book no. 14, pp. 31–39). Jerusalem, Israel: MOFET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Loughran, J. J. (2007). Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education: Values, relationships and practices. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., & Munby, H. (1991). Reframing: The role of experience in developing teachers’ professional knowledge. In D. A. Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice (pp. 164–187). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it is too late? San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1965). Conditions of knowledge: An introduction to epistemology and education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (Ed.). (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2002). Disturbing practice: Reading teacher education as text. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2011). Learning from teacher thinking. In J. Loughran, K. Smith, & A. Berry (Eds.), Scientific literacy under the microscope: A whole school approach to science teaching and learning (pp. 25–36). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, W. J. (1992). Teachers’ work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 267–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoiber, K. C. (1991). The effect of technical and reflective preservice instruction on pedagogical reasoning and problem solving. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tom, A. R., & Valli, L. (1990). Professional knowledge for teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 372–392). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M. E. (2002). Pedagogical reasoning: Issues and solutions for the teaching and learning of ICT in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 7(3), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, R. (1994). Using Shulman’s model of pedagogical reasoning and action in a preservice program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Teacher Education Association, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. http://search.proquest.com/docview/62738772?accountid=12528

  • Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (Eds.). (1984). Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, P., & Bird, T. (2010). Using embedded assessments to promote pedagogical reasoning among secondary teaching candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(2), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangori, L., Forbes, C. T., & Biggers, M. (2013). Fostering student sense making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers’ use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 989–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (1994). Research on teacher thinking and different views of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and actions: Research on teachers’ thinking and practice (pp. 9–28). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M. (1995). Reflections of a teacher educator working for social change. In T. Russell & F. A. J. Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers (pp. 11–24). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teacher and Teacher Education, 21, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Loughran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loughran, J., Keast, S., Cooper, R. (2016). Pedagogical Reasoning in Teacher Education. In: Loughran, J., Hamilton, M. (eds) International Handbook of Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0364-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0366-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics