Skip to main content

A Metacognitive Approach to Financial Literacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Financial Literacy

Abstract

An emerging body of literature in the study of financial literacy highlights that information plays a little role in many financial decisions. Being informed about financial topics does not seem the key aspect to make efficient choices. Recent studies indicated that what is really crucial in order to prompt adequate attitudes towards financial issues is the way human mind processes information. Deliberation, intuition, and heuristics are three different modes of thinking which can be activated when individuals reason about financial issues. None of them is absolutely better than the others since they are qualitatively different types of information processing. Rather, the effectiveness of a financial decision depends on the individual ability to select the specific mode of thinking which best suits the situation at hand. Metacognition might be considered as a way to help people promoting their ability to identify the relevant strategies to be applied in a specific situation and to self-regulate their own behaviour in order to flexibly manage the three thinking systems and make effective financial decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldi, P. L., Iannello, P., Riva, S., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Socially biased decisions are associated to individual differences in cognitive reflection. Studia Psychologica, 55, 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In G. Constantinides, R. Stulz, & M. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (pp. 1053–1128). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., & Garrett, D. M. (2003). The effects of financial education in the workplace: Evidence from a survey of households. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1487–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., Garrett, D. M., & Maki, D. M. (2001). Education and saving: The long-term effects of high school financial curriculum mandates. Journal of Public Economics, 80, 435–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berti, A. E., & Bombi, S. (1988). The child’s construction of economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., & Sturdevant, T. (1987). Teaching thinking and problem solving. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 162–181). New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpena, F., Cole, S., Shapiro, J., & Zia, B. (2011). Unpacking the causal chain of financial literacy. Working Paper N.5798, World Bank Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, B., Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2010). Metacognitive knowledge of decision-making: An explorative study. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognitive research (pp. 445–472). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., & Haberman, H. R. (2007). Teen financial knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior: A gendered view. Financial Counseling and Planning, 18, 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danes, S. M., Hudelstone-Casas, C., & Boyce, L. (1999). Financial planning curriculum for teen: Impact evaluation. Financial Counseling and Planning, 10, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Meza, D., Irlenbusch, B., Reyniers, D. (2008). Financial capability: A behavioural economics perspective. London, UK: The Financial Services Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dismore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement pan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 815–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Thinking twice. Two minds in one brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings. The intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D. T. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 167–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2005). Blick. The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, K., Ingham, J., & Matasar, R. (2005). Strong palliative, but not a panacea: Results of an experiment teaching students about financial literacy. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 35, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannello, P. (2010). Mindreading processes in strategic decision making. When intuition makes a difference. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller e.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2008). Reciprocity in financial decision-making: Intuitive and analytical mind-reading strategies. International Review of Economics, 55, 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannello, P., Perucca, V., Riva, S., Antonietti, A., & Pravettoni, G. (2015). What do physicians believe about the way decisions are made? A pilot study on metacognitive knowledge in the medical context. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 11, 691–706, doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i4.979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrenzi, P., & Cervellin, R. (2011). I principi dell’educazione finanziaria non sono solo finanziari. In E. Castrovilli (Ed.), Educazione finanziaria a scuola (pp. 111–118). Milano: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusardi, A. (2008). Household saving behavior: The role of financial literacy, information, and financial education programs. NBER Working Paper 1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. (2007). Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Business Economics, 42, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. (2008). Planning and financial literacy. How do women fare? American Economic Review, 98, 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, A. C., Chang, Y., & Scherpf, E. (2006). Translating financial education into behavior change for low-income populations. Financial Counseling and Planning Journal, 17, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macchi, L., Over, D., & Viale, R. (Eds.) (2012). Dual process theories of human thought: The debate. Mind and Society, 11 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, L., & Klein, L. S. (2007). Motivation and financial literacy. Financial Services Review, 16, 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrobuoni, G. (2011). The role of information for retirement behavior: Evidence based on the social security statement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 913–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). Improving financial literacy: Analysis of issues and policies. OECD Centre: Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, B. W., & Neter, E. (1995). The effect of motivation on judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, T.-C. M., Bartholomae, S., Fox, J. J., & Cravener, G. (2007). The impact of personal finance education delivered in high school and college courses. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roa García, M. J. (2013). Financial education and behavioral finance: New insights into the role of information in financial decisions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In J. Metcalfe, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278–298). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H. (2002). Behavioral decision making, forecasting, game theory, and role-play. International Journal of Forecasting, 18, 375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varcoe, K. P., Martin, A., Devitto, Z., & Go, C. (2005). Using a financial education curriculum for teens. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 16, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, F. E. (1990). Varieties of intuitive experience. In W. H. Agor (Ed.), Intuition in organizations (pp. 40–61). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walstad, W. B., Rebeck, K., & MacDonald, R. A. (2010). The effects of financial education on the financial knowledge of high school students. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44, 336–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., & Zia, B. (2012). Financial literacy around the world. An overview of the evidence with practical suggestions for the way forward. The World Bank, Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Team.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Antonietti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Antonietti, A., Borsetto, A., Iannello, P. (2016). A Metacognitive Approach to Financial Literacy. In: Aprea, C., et al. International Handbook of Financial Literacy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0358-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0360-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics