Abstract
Decision making competence is a central objective of economic education in general and financial education in particular. Children and young people should be enabled to make the most rational decisions possible, in economic life situations (Retzmann et al. 2010; CEE 2013). This particularly relates to financial decision making situations, because these are often characterized by a high level of complexity, and the consequences of wrong decisions have direct material effects. The field of behavioural economics deals with the systematic research of irrational decisions within the economic sciences. Over the past few years, however, the emergence of behavioural economics and behavioural finance has supplemented the rational choice paradigm with psychological aspects, and also, in part, called it into question. The chapter, as outlined here, shall highlight whether and to what extent new theoretical approaches of behavioural finance are changing the conceptual understanding and the subject area of financial literacy. Initially, rational decision making competence will be described in more detail as an objective of financial education, the relationship of rational choice and behavioural economics will be clarified and the basic findings on behavioural finance for decision making will be presented. On the basis of this, relevant anomalies, biases and heuristics for the example of financial investing will be revealed, and implications for the education process will be sketched out. The typical three phases in the process of decision making serve as systematization here: Information perception, information processing and evaluation and decision making. The exemplary analysis shows that knowledge about typical anomalies, biases and heuristics on an individual level can have an effect on the quality of financial decisions.
The original version of this chapter was revised. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_44
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_44
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Altman, M. (2012). Implications of behavioral economics for financial literacy and public policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2012), 677–690.
Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory. Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
CEE—Council for Economic Education. (2010). Voluntary national content standards in economics (2nd ed.). New York.
CEE—Council for Economic Education. (2013). National standards for financial literacy. New York.
Daxhammer, R. J., & Facsar, M. (2012). Behavioral finance. Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Finanzmarktforschung im Lichte begrenzt rationaler Marktteilnehmer. Constance: UVK.
de Mello Ferreira, V. R. (2011). Can economic psychology and behavioural economics help improve financial education? In: OECD (Ed.), Improving financial education efficiency: OECD-Bank of Italy symposium on financial literacy (pp. 103–120). USA: OECD Publishing.
de Meza, D., et al. (2008). Financial capability: A behavioural economics perspective. London: FSA, Consumer Research No. 69.
DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 315–372.
Durham, Y., McKinnon, T., & Schulman, C. (2007). Classroom experiments: Not just fun and games. Economic Inquiry, 45(1), 162–178.
Earl, P. E. (2005). Behavioral Economics and the Economics of Regulation. Briefing paper prepared for the New Zealand Ministry of Economic Development.
Fama, E. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Holt, C. A. (1999). Teaching economics with classroom experiments. Southern Economic Journal, 65(3), 603–610.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Kirchgässner, G. (2008). Homo Oeconomicus. The economic model of behaviour and its applications in economics and other social sciences. New York: Springer.
Landsburg, S. E. (1995). The armchair economist. New York: Economics & Everyday Life.
Loerwald, D., & Retzmann, T. (2010). Misselling as a new topic of financial education? A didactic analysis of investment advice after the financial crisis. Journal of Social Science Education, 9(1), 49–58.
Madura, J., et al. (2014). Personal financial literacy (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River.
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
OECD, I. N. F. E. (2011). Measuring financial literacy: Core questionnaire in measuring financial literacy: Questionnaire and guidance notes for conducting an internationally comparable survey of financial literacy. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, sciences, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ottone, S. (2006). Fairness: A survey. Working Paper No. 64, 01/2006. Dipartimento di Politiche Pubbliche e Scelte Collettive. Alessandria.
Retzmann, T., et al. (2010). Educational standards for economic education at all types of general-education schools in Germany. Final Report to the Gemeinschaftsausschuss der Deutschen Gewerblichen Wirtschaft (Working Group “Economic Education”). Essen, Lahr, Kiel.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 69–118.
Thaler, R., & Shefrin, H. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392–406.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics und Biases. Science, New Series, 85(4157), 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, New Series, 211(4481), 453–457.
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). The theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vosniadou, S., & Mason, L. (2012). Conceptual change induced by instruction: A complex interplay of multiple factors. In: R. Karen & Harris et al. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (Vol. 2, pp. 221–246).
Yoong, J. (2011). Can behavioral economics be used to make financial education more effective? In: OECD (Ed.), Improving financial education efficiency: OECD-Bank of Italy symposium on financial literacy (pp. 65–101). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loerwald, D., Stemmann, A. (2016). Behavioral Finance and Financial Literacy: Educational Implications of Biases in Financial Decision Making. In: Aprea, C., et al. International Handbook of Financial Literacy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0358-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0360-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)