Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Fairer Chance for All: Revising the Australian Student Equity Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Student Equity in Australian Higher Education

Abstract

In 1990, the Australian Government published A Fair Chance for All, the first national framework for student equity in higher education. A Fair Chance for All declared that all Australians should have the opportunity to participate successfully in higher education, and that this objective could be met by ‘changing the balance of the student population to reflect more closely the composition of society as a whole’ (Department of Education Employment and Training, A fair chance for all: national and institutional planning for equity in higher education. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1990, p. 2). The Framework identified six under-represented groups for policy priority: people from low socioeconomic backgrounds; Indigenous Australians; people from regional and remote areas; people with disabilities; people from non-English speaking backgrounds; and women in non-traditional areas. Ambitious participation targets were established for each group, and national and institutional strategies were outlined to help reach these targets. Twenty-five years on, the architecture of the Framework remains in place. The original objectives, strategies and categories have shaped how access to higher education is understood, funded and managed through the most significant period of growth in higher education in Australia’s history. Targeted strategies and a rapid increase in student numbers have opened the doors of university to more Australians than ever before. Yet despite progress across some of the six categories and broad systemic growth, the student population still does not reflect the composition of society (Koshy, Student equity performance in Australian higher education. National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education, Perth, 2014). Inequality is persistent, and progress in widening participation has been slow. This chapter argues the need for comprehensive reform of student equity policy to drive systemic and cultural change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, I. (2015). Indigenous Australians and Higher Education: The contemporary policy agenda. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2012a). Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2012. Retrieved July 31, 2014, from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2014C00829

  • Australian Government. (2012b). Higher Education Support Act 2003 – Other grants guidelines (education) 2012. Retrieved July 31, 2014, from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012L00281/Html/Text#_Toc314566228

  • Australian Government. (2014a). Higher education statistics 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2014, from http://highereducationstatistics.education.gov.au/

  • Australian Government. (2014b). Public universities. Retrieved August 1, 2014, from https://education.gov.au/public-universities

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2014). Towards a performance measurement framework for equity in higher education. Cat. no. IHW 129. Canberra: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • AVCC/ACDP. (1988). Report of the AVCC/ACDP working party on performance indicators. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C., & Hepple, B. (2000). Substantive equality. Cambridge Law Journal, 59(3), 562–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, L., Larkin, S., Griew, R., & Kelly, P. (2012). Review of Higher Education Access and Outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: Final report. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2015). Ivory towers and glass ceilings: Women in non-traditional fields. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & May, R. (2015). Ladders of opportunity: Postgraduate equity, professions and the academic workforce. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Moshe, D., & Bertone, S., & Grossman, M. (2008). Refugee access and participation in tertiary education and training. Melbourne: Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon, E. M., & Malcom, L. (Eds.). (2012). Confronting equity issues on campus: Implementing the Equity Scorecard in theory and practice. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexley, E. (2015). Further and higher? Institutional diversity and stratification. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexley, E., Daroesman, S., Arkoudis, S., & James, R. (2012). University student finances in 2012: A study of the financial circumstances of domestic and international students in Australia’s universities. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education/University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, M. (2015). Disability and Australian higher education: Policy drivers for increasing participation. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield, L., Higgins, D., Osborn, A., Panozzo, S., & Richardson, N. (2005). Out-of-home care in Australia: messages from research. A report to the Community Services Ministers Advisory Council commissioned by the Australian Government Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, C., & Harvey, A. (2015). Far from the studying crowd? Regional and remote students in higher education. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). Mid-year economic and fiscal outlook 2015-16 December. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.budget.gov.au/2015-16/content/myefo/download/MYEFO_2015-16_Final.pdf. Viewed 6 Jan 2016.

  • CREATE Foundation. (2006). Report card on education 2006. Sydney: CREATE Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, G., Marginson, S., Norton, A., & Wells, J. (Eds.). (2013). The Dawkins revolution: 25 years on. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. S. (1987). Higher education: A policy discussion paper (‘Green paper’). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. S. (1988). Higher education: A policy statement (‘White paper’). Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training (DET). (2015). 2014 appendix 2 – Equity tables. Retrieved July 31, 2015, from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/35979

  • Department of Education Employment and Training (DEET). (1990). A Fair Chance for All: National and institutional planning for equity in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2010). The future of the research workforce: Estimating demand for PhDs in Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(2), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. (2008). Unravelling emotional, behavioural and educational outcomes in a longitudinal study of children in foster-care. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1283–1301. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T. (2014). Women leaders in higher education: Shattering the myths. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, T., & Wilkinson, J. (2010). Travelling towards a mirage? Gender, equity and higher education. Brisbane: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Parker, S. (2013). Widening participation in Australian higher education. London: Higher Education Funding Council of England/The Office for Fair Access.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. (2008). An equality act for a fairer Victoria, equal opportunity act review final report. Melbourne: Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonski, D. (2011). Review of funding for schooling. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group of Eight Australia. (2014). Backgrounder: Private higher education providers in Australia. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from https://go8.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/publications/backgrounder_-_private_higher_education_providers_in_australia_final.pdf

  • Gruenfeld, D. H., Thomas-Hunt, M., & Kim, P. (1998). Cognitive flexibility, communication strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to majority and minority status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, J. (2014, June 11). Fee hikes unlikely to deter poorer students. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/

  • Hare, J. (2015, July 15). Equity and diversity integral to new university rankings. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au

  • Harvey, A. (2014). Early and delayed offers to under-represented university students. Australian Journal of Education, 58(2), 167–181. doi:10.1177/0004944114523367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., & Andrewartha, L. (2013). Dr Who? Equity and diversity among university postgraduate and higher degree cohorts. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(2), 112–123. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2013.775921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., Andrewartha, L., & Burnheim, C. (2015a). Out of reach? University for people from low socio-economic status backgrounds. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., Andrewartha, L., & McNamara, P. (2015b). A forgotten cohort? Including people from out-of-home care in Australian higher education policy. Australian Journal of Education, 59(2), 182–195. doi:10.1177/0004944115587529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A., McNamara, P., Andrewartha, L., & Luckman, M. (2015c). Out of care, into university: Raising higher education access and achievement of care leavers. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE)/Curtin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heagney, M. (2010). Beyond Bradley: equity for postgraduates. Paper presented at the AAIR Conference, Geelong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoving, E. (2015, March 20). Higher HECS fees keep poor students out of universities. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from http://www.solidarity.net.au/mag/current/issue-76-mar/higher-hecs-fees-keep-poor-students-out-of-universities

  • James, R., Baldwin, G., Coates, H., Krause, K.-L., & McInnis, C. (2004). Analysis of equity groups in higher education 1991−2002. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education/The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Natalier, K., Mendes, P., Liddiard, M., Thoresen, S., Hollows, A., & Bailey, N. (2010). Pathways from out-of-home care. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D., & Norton, A. (2014). Review of the demand driven funding system: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koshy, P. (2014). Student equity performance in Australian higher education. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, C. (2015). First Peoples: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participation in higher education. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linke, R. (1991). Performance indicators in higher education: Report of a trial evaluation. Study Commissioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2015). Higher education and inequality in Anglo-American societies. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (1994). Equity and general performance indicators in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L. (2015). Framing the framework: The origins of A Fair Chance for All. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestan, K. (2015). Access, achievement and outcomes among students from non-English speaking backgrounds. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestan, K., & Harvey, A. (2014). The higher education continuum: Access, achievement and outcomes among students from non-English speaking backgrounds. Higher Education Review, 46(2), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, S. (2014). Degrees of inequality: How the politics of higher education sabotaged the American dream. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milem, J. F., Chang, M. J., & Lising, A. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: A research-based perspective (Making Excellence Inclusive initiative). Washington, DC : Association American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Employment Education and Training (NBEET). (1996). Equality, diversity and excellence: Advancing the national higher education equity framework. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R., Coates, H., & Kelly, P. (2015). From Equity to excellence: Reforming Australia’s national framework to create new forms of success. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2012). Graduate Winners: Assessing the public and private benefits of higher education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2013a). Keep the caps off! Student access and choice in higher education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2013b). Mapping Australian higher education. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2014a). Mapping Australian higher education, 2014-15. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2014b, July 28). Language background should be dropped as a higher ed equity category [Blog post]. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://andrewnorton.net.au/feed/

  • Norton, A. (2015a). The ATAR debate: Students need to be able to finish uni, not just start it. The Conversation. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://theconversation.com/the-atar-debate-students-need-to-be-able-to-finish-uni-not-just-start-it-36478

  • Norton, A. (2015b). Equity and markets. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, T. (2014). More students in higher ed, but it’s no more representative. The Conversation. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://theconversation.com/more-students-in-higher-ed-but-its-no-more-representative-29582

  • Sellar, S., & Gale, T. (2015). Framing student equity in higher education: National and global policy contexts of A Fair Chance for All. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Bradshaw, T., Burnett, K., Docherty, D., Purcell, W., & Worthington, S. (2010). One step beyond: Making the most of postgraduate education. London: Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, S. H., & Liddiard, M. (2011). Failure of care in State care: In-case abuse and postcare homelessness. Children Australia, 36(1), 4–11. doi:10.1375/jcas.36.1.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tones, M., Fraser, J., Elder, R., & White, K. (2009). Supporting mature-aged students from a low socioeconomic background. High Education, 58(4), 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M. (2012). Are we making the grade? The education of children and young people in out-of-home care. Ashfield: Department of Family and Community Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, P. (2009). Social class and access to postgraduate education in the UK: A sociological analysis. (PhD thesis). The University of Manchester. http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~pbjw1/Paul%20Wakeling,%20PhD%20thesis%202009,%20Social%20class%20and%20access%20to%20postgraduate%20education%20in%20the%20UK.pdf

  • Watson, L., & Pope, B. (2000). Equity in Australian education and training: An examination of access and outcomes data across the sectors. Canberra: Vocational Education and Training Research Association Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. A., Berger, J. B., & McClendon, S. A. (2005). Toward a model of inclusive excellence and change in postsecondary institutions. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziguras, C. (2015). And Fairness for All? Equity and the international student cohort. In A. Harvey, C. Burnheim, & M. Brett (Eds.), Student equity in Australian higher education: Twenty-five years of A Fair Chance for All. Singapore: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Access and Achievement Research Unit, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Andrew Harvey

  2. Office of the Vice-Provost (Education Programs), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Catherine Burnheim

  3. Planning and Governance, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Matthew Brett

Authors
  1. Andrew Harvey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catherine Burnheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Brett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Harvey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Andrew Harvey

  2. Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Catherine Burnheim

  3. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Matthew Brett

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harvey, A., Burnheim, C., Brett, M. (2016). Towards a Fairer Chance for All: Revising the Australian Student Equity Framework. In: Harvey, A., Burnheim, C., Brett, M. (eds) Student Equity in Australian Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0315-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0315-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0313-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0315-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation