Abstract
For girls coming of age in a sexualized and digitally-mediated culture, sexting is not uncommon. While self-sexualizing through technology tends to be framed as risk behavior, not all girls are affected in the same way. For some, creating sexualized content using digital media provides opportunities for sexual exploration. However, among feminist scholars, debates concerning girls’ sexual empowerment persist. Many argue that despite professed empowerment, girls’ participation in creating sexually-explicit material reinforces gender/sexual scripts borne out of a male gaze. Others contend that self-sexualization may be necessary for girls’ sexuality development in a world that magnifies concerns over female sexuality and circumscribes its expression. Missing from debates is consideration of girls’ embodied sexual experiences, including theorization of sexual pleasure as a holistic force that merges body, mind and culture. Using feminist new materialist and embodiment theory, this chapter unpacks dominant narratives shaping girls’ sexualities and presents an alternate conceptualization of sexuality as an emergent force that materializes through the interactivity of biology, psyche, and society. Applying an intersectional lens that reveals how “the girl” in this discourse operates as an unmarked (white, heteronormative) category, we argue for the need to focus on diversely-located experiences of sexual pleasure, including sexting and self-sexualizing generally, as stepping stones to sexual empowerment in a digitally-mediated, sexist climate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Albury, K., & Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s story. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 26(3), 463–473.
American Psychological Association. (2007). APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2010). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report-full.pdf
Angelides, S. (2012). The “second sexual revolution”, moral panic, and the evasion of teenage sexual subjectivity. Women’s History Review, 21(3), 831–847.
Bailey, R. (2011). Letting children be children: Report of an independent review of the commercialisation and sexualization of childhood. UK Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/15418/Bailey_Review.pdf
Battersby, C. (1998). The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. New York: Routledge.
Benotsch, E. G., Snipes, D. J., Martin, A. M., & Bull, S. S. (2013). Sexting, substance use, and sexual risk behavior in young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(3), 307–313.
Bey-Cheng, L. (2012). Recovering empowerment: De-personalizing and re-politicizing adolescent female sexuality. Sex Roles, 66, 713–717.
Bond, E. (2010). The mobile phone = bike shed? Children, sex and mobile phones. New Media and Society, 13(4), 587–604.
Egan, R. D. (2013). Becoming sexual: A critical appraisal of the sexualization of girls. Toronto: Wiley.
Egan, D., & Hawkes, G. (2009). The problem with protection: Or, why we need to move towards recognition and the sexual agency of children. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 23(3), 389–400.
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Feminists who flaunt it: Exploring the enjoyment of sexualization among young feminist women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(12), 2341–2349.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. London and New York: Routledge.
Ferguson, C. (2011). Sexting behaviors among young Hispanic women: Incidence and association with other high-risk sexual behaviors. Psychiatry Quarterly, 82, 239–243.
Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.
Frederickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
Gavey, N. (2012). Beyond “empowerment”? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66, 718–772.
Gill, R. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14, 69–80.
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.
Grosz, E. A. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Hiller, L., & Harrison, L. (2007). Building realities less limited than their own: Young people practicing same-sex attraction on the Internet. Sexualities, 10(1), 82–100.
Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2010). Theorizing sexuality. London: Open University Press.
Klettke, B., Hallford, D., & Mellor, D. (2014). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44–53.
Krieger, N. (2005). Embodiment: A conceptual glossary for epidemiology. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(5), 350–355.
Lamb, S. (2010). Porn as a pathway to empowerment? A response to Peterson’s Commentary. Sex Roles, 62, 314–317.
Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703–712.
Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2009). Toward an interdisciplinary dialogue on youth, sexualization, and health. Journal of Sex Research, 46(4), 271–273.
Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Marshall, A. (1996). From sexual denigration to self-respect: Resisting images of black female sexuality. In D. Jarrett-MacAualey (Ed.), Reconstructing womanhood, reconstructing feminism: Writings on black women (pp. 5–35). London: Routledge.
Papadopolous, L. (2010). Sexualization of young people review. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100418065544/http://homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/Sexualization-of-young-people2835.pdf?view=Binary
Pascoe, C. (2011). Resource and risk: Youth sexuality and new media use. Sex Research and Social Policy, 8, 5–17.
Peterson, Z. D. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? Amultidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307–313.
Peterson, Z., & Lamb, S. (2012). The political context for personal empowerment: Continuing the conversation. Sex Roles, 66, 758–763.
Pew Research Centre. (2010). Teens, adults and sexting: Data on sending and receiving sexually suggestive nude or nearly nude photos. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Presentations/2010/Oct/Teens-Adults-and-Sexting.aspx
Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2011). Schizoid subjectivities? Re-theorizing teen girls’ sexual cultures in an era of “sexualization”. Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 389–409.
Renold, E., & Ringrose, J. (2013). Feminisms re-figuring “sexualization”, sexuality and “the girl”. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 247–254.
Rice, C. (2014). Becoming women: The embodied self in image culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Strasburger, V. C., Jordan, A. B., & Donnerstein, E. (2012). Children, adolescents, and the media: Health effects. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 59(3), 533.
Temple, J. R., Paul, J. A., van den Berg, P., Le, V. D., McElhany, A., & Temple, B. W. (2012). Teen sexting and its association with sexual behaviors. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 166(9), 828–833.
Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.
Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 746–757.
Tsai, W. (2010). Assimilating the queers: Representations of lesbians, gay men, bisexual, and transgender people in mainstream advertising. Advertising and Society Review, 11(1). doi:10.1353/asr.0.0042
Valenti, J. (2009). The purity myth: How America’s obsession with virginity is hurting young women. New York City: Seal Press.
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. (2012). How often are tees arrested for sexting? Data from a national sample of police cases. Pediatrics, 129, 4–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rice, C., Watson, E. (2016). Girls and Sexting: The Missing Story of Sexual Subjectivity in a Sexualized and Digitally-Mediated World. In: Coffey, J., Budgeon, S., Cahill, H. (eds) Learning Bodies. Perspectives on Children and Young People, vol 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0306-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0306-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0304-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0306-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)