Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Community Vulnerability to Natural Disasters in Korea by Using GIS and Machine Learning Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 25))

Abstract

Despite similar natural hazard magnitudes, the economic losses and fatalities due to natural disasters are usually unevenly distributed among nations, regions, communities, and individuals. Socially, economically, and environmentally vulnerable communities are more likely to suffer disproportionately from disasters. Identifying vulnerability factors to disasters is critical information for disaster managers and planners to make disaster-related policy and strategies for mitigating the negative impacts of disasters. This study constructs an index of disaster vulnerability of local communities in Korea. Twelve indicators including social, economic, and natural environment and built environment aspects are selected to assess 230 local communities’ vulnerability to disasters. Economic losses from disasters from 2001 to 2010 in Korea are analyzed using GIS. Moreover, this study examines the relationships between the constructed vulnerability indicators and economic damage from natural disasters. Machine learning techniques including Cubist and Random Forest are applied to examine what vulnerability indicators are statistically associated with disaster damage in Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ArmaČ™, I., and A. GavriČ™. 2013. Social vulnerability assessment using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SEVI model) and the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI model) – A case study for Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13(6): 1481–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biass, S., C. Frischknecht, and C. Bonadonna. 2013. A fast GIS-based risk assessment for tephra fallout: The example of Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. Natural Hazards 65(1): 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C., and S.L. Cutter. 2008. Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area, California. Natural Hazards Review 9(3): 136–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S.E., J.Z. Yip, S.L.V.Z. de Jong, R. Chaster, and A. Lowcock. 2015. Using vulnerability indicators to develop resilience networks: A similarity approach. Natural Hazards 78(3): 1827–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S.L., and C. Finch. 2008. Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(7): 2301–2306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, S.L., B.J. Boruff, and W.L. Shirley. 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84(2): 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DĂ­az-Uriarte, R., and S.A. De Andres. 2006. Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1): 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrich, C.T., and S.L. Cutter. 2011. Social vulnerability to climate-sensitive hazards in the southern United States. Weather, Climate and Society 3(3): 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esnard, A.M., A. Sapat, and D. Mitsova. 2011. An index of relative displacement risk to hurricanes. Natural Hazards 59(2): 833–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, D., and M. Lichter. 2014. Social and economic vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise and extreme flooding. Natural Hazards 71(1): 463–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fengqing, J., Z. Cheng, M. Guijin, H. Ruji, and M. Qingxia. 2005. Magnification of flood disasters and its relation to regional precipitation and local human activities since the 1980s in Xinjiang, Northwestern China. Natural Hazards 36(3): 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flax, L.K., R.W. Jackson, and D.N. Stein. 2002. Community vulnerability assessment tool methodology. Natural Hazards Review 3(4): 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., H. Yuan, W. Qi, and S. Liu. 2014. Assessing the social and economic vulnerability of urban areas to disasters: A case study in Beijing, China. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development 2(1): 42–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grömping, U. 2009. Variable importance assessment in regression: Linear regression versus random forest. American Statistician 63(4): 308–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis with readings. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L.C. 1992. Regression with graphics: A second course in applied statistics. Belmont: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, J., J.R. Jensen, M. Coleman, and E. Nelson. 2009. Hyperspectral remote sensing analysis of short rotation woody crops grown with controlled nutrient and irrigation treatments. Geocarto International 24(4): 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im, J., Z. Lu, J. Rhee, and L.J. Quackenbush. 2012. Impervious surface quantification using a synthesis of artificial immune networks and decision/regression trees from multi-sensor data. Remote Sensing of Environment 117: 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.O., S.B. Seo, and O.J. Jang. 2012. Flood risk assessment using regional regression analysis. Natural Hazards 63(2): 1203–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.H., J. Im, H.K. Ha, J.K. Choi, and S. Ha. 2014. Machine learning approaches to coastal water quality monitoring using GOCI satellite data. GIScience & Remote Sensing 51(2): 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korean Statistical Information Service. 2011. http://kosis.kr/. Accessed 22 Aug 2015.

  • Kuhlicke, C., A. Scolobig, S. Tapsell, A. SteinfĂĽhrer, and B. De Marchi. 2011. Contextualizing social vulnerability: Findings from case studies across Europe. Natural Hazards 58(2): 789–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., J. Im, L.J. Quackenbush, and T. Liu. 2014. Forest biomass and carbon stock quantification using airborne lidar data: A case study over Huntington wildlife forest in the Adirondack Park. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 7(7): 3143–3156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, A., and M. Wiener. 2002. Classification and regression by randomForest. R news 2(3): 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N.K., M. Peterson, and S.B. Kleiser. 1999. Marketing research: A state-of-the-art review and directions of the twenty-first century. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27(2): 160–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, V.N., D.S. e Silva, and P. Cabral. 2012. Social vulnerability assessment to seismic risk using multicriteria analysis: The case study of Vila Franca do Campo (SĂŁo Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal). Natural Hazards 62(2): 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEntire, D. 2012. Understanding and reducing vulnerability: From the approach of liabilities and capabilities. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 21(2): 206–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny, B., and A.B. McBratney. 2008. Regression rules as a tool for predicting soil properties from infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 94(1): 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C.A., T. Slack, and J. Singelmann. 2008. Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment 29(6): 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. 2011. The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, K., C. Atzberger, T.B. Hank, and W. Mauser. 2012. Derivation of biophysical variables from earth observation data: Validation and statistical measures. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 6(1): 063557–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, R.C. 2006. Small business in the face of crisis: Identifying barriers to recovery from a natural disaster. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 14(1): 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, L., and M. Pelling. 2006. Disaster risk, climate change and international development: Scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 30(1): 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J., and Z.G. Xia. 2008. Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: Model design and evaluation. The Science of the Total Environment 407(1): 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uitto, J.I. 1998. The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities: A theoretical framework. Applied Geography 18(1): 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S., J. Im, and J.E. Wagner. 2012. Variable selection for hedonic model using machine learning approaches: A case study in Onondaga County, NY. Landscape and Urban Planning 107(3): 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, D.K. 2012. Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: A comparative study. Natural Hazards 63(2): 823–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, D., and C. Wu. 2006. Incorporating remote sensing information in modeling house values. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 72(2): 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahran, S., S.D. Brody, W.G. Peacock, A. Vedlitz, and H. Grover. 2008. Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: A model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters 32(4): 537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., N. Li, W. Wu, and J. Wu. 2014. Assessment of provincial social vulnerability to natural disasters in China. Natural Hazards 71(3): 2165–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban Planning and Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

    Dong Keun Yoon

  2. School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea

    Seunghoo Jeong

Authors
  1. Dong Keun Yoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seunghoo Jeong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Keun Yoon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development and Research Institute of Agricultural and Life Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Euijune Kim

  2. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteology, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)

    Brian H. S. Kim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yoon, D.K., Jeong, S. (2016). Assessment of Community Vulnerability to Natural Disasters in Korea by Using GIS and Machine Learning Techniques. In: Kim, E., Kim, B. (eds) Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0298-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0300-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation