Skip to main content

Effects of the Project Investments and Valuation of the Water Quality Improvement of the River Taehwa in Ulsan, Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 548 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives ((NFRSASIPER,volume 25))

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of the project investments on the river water quality improvement and also provides contingent valuation estimates of household’s willingness to pay (WTP) to continue public investment to the river water quality improvement and maintenance. The estimation results using the OLS regression models with correction of autocorrelation show that the household soil pipe connection project with investment of 26.7 billion KRW has reduced 1.68 ppm in BOD and that the project dredging sediments at the river bottom with investment of 16 billion KRW has resulted in the decrease of 1.12 ppm in BOD at the downstream of the River Taehwa. Using a contingent valuation method with multiple choices in consideration of respondent’s uncertainty, the estimation results of four logit models show that truncated mean household’s WTP is estimated from 1224.7 KRW to 2747 KRW for the respective four models. The present values of total social benefits in the Ulsan Metropolitan City are estimated from 196 billion KRW to 441 billion KRW for the respective four models, when applying the 3 % discount rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberini, A., K. Boyle, and M. Welsh. 2003. Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, R.J., E. Solow, E. Leamer, P. Portney, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–4614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrens, R.P., H.K. Smith, A.K. Bohara, and C.L. Silva. 2002. Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: Fair share, time contribution, and response uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 144–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, T.A. 1988. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15: 355–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R.T., W.M. Hanemann, R.J. Kopp, J.A. Krosnick, R.C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P.A. Ruud, and V.R. Smith. 1994. Prospect interim lost use value due to DDT and PCB contamination in the Southern California bight. A Report of National Resource Damage Assessment, Inc. and Industrial Economics, Inc. to US NOAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J.I., S.H. Yoo, and S.J. Kwak. 2005. An empirical investigation of contingent valuation method with preference uncertainty. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 14(1): 75–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J.-I., S.-H. Yoo, and S.-J. Kwak. 2007. An investigation of preference uncertainty in the contingent valuation study. Applied Economics Letters 14: 691–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W.M. 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.H. 2007. Social benefits of improved water quality at the Taehwa river based on citizen’s willingness-to pay. Journal of Environmental Policy 6(1): 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.H. 2009. The effects of the project investment for water quality improvement in the river Taehwa. Korea Spatial Planning Review 62: 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krinsky, I., and A.I. Robb. 1986. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 68: 713–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krinsky, I., and A.I. Robb. 1990. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities: Correction. Review of Economics and Statistics 72: 189–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.-Z., and L. Mattsson. 1995. Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: An improved structural model for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28: 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J., and E. Ekstrand. 1998. Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: The case of Mexican Spotted Owl. Ecological Economics 27: 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConell, K.E. 1990. Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18: 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ready, R.C., J.C. Whitehead, and G.C. Bloomquist. 1995. Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. 1997. Treatment of “don’t-know” responses in contingent valuation surveys: A random valuation model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, M.P., and G.L. Poe. 1998. Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38: 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J., G. Blomquist, R. Ready, and J. Huang. 1998. Construct validity of dichotomous choice contingent valuation questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 11: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, D., G. Cassidy, D. Amaral, E. McClelland, H. Wang, and C. Poulos. 1994. The economic value of improving the environmental quality of Galveston Bay. The Calveston Bay national estuary program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S.H. 2007. Using one and one-half bounded dichotomous choice model to measure the economic benefit.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Hong Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, J.H. (2016). Effects of the Project Investments and Valuation of the Water Quality Improvement of the River Taehwa in Ulsan, Korea. In: Kim, E., Kim, B. (eds) Quantitative Regional Economic and Environmental Analysis for Sustainability in Korea. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, vol 25. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0300-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0298-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0300-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics