Skip to main content

Phieval: Four-Phase Plagiarism Detection System in Private MOOCs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emerging Research in Computing, Information, Communication and Applications
  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

Massive open online courses or MOOCs have gained significant prominence as an e-learning platform. With large participation in MOOCs, an instructor is challenged with a gigantic task of assessing submissions for correctness and authenticity. For offering reputed and high-quality course completion certificates, a plagiarism detector is a must. In this paper we propose a four-phase plagiarism detection system that operates on large-scale submissions. This system exploits the dual but independent concepts of geodata and fast string-matching algorithms on top of big data platforms to solve this problem to a large extent. Given the context of these learning systems, and very high volume student participation, we are able to apply several optimizations in checking for plagiarism. This system is intended to benefit the course instructors by encouraging them to post advanced levels of courseware and more complicated assignments without bothering much about evaluation-related issues such as plagiarism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MOOCs and plagiarism: The plague of Online learning. http://www.gathereducation.com/blog/2012/plagiarism-and-moocs/

  2. The chronicle of higher education: http://chronicle.com/article/Dozens-of-Plagiarism-Incidents/133697/

  3. Haritha, N., Bhavani, M.: C code plagiarism detection. Int. J. Sci. Adv. Technol. 1(5) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chunhui, W., Zhiguo, L., Dongsheng, L.: Preventing and detecting plagiarism in programming course. Int. J. Secur. Appl. 7(5) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ajmal, O., Saad Missen, M.M., Hashmat, T., Moosa, M.: Eplag: a two layer source code plagiarism detection. In: IEEE conference paper (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Muddu, B., Asadullah, A., Bhat, V.: CPDP:A robust technique for plagiarism detection in source code. In: IEEE conference, paper (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rabin Karp Algorithm: http://www.cs.mun.ca/~kol/courses/6783-w12/scribe-rabin-karp.pdf

  8. Rabin Karp: http://www.sci.unich.it/~acciaro/Rabin_Karp.pdf

  9. Broanac, P., Budin, L., Jakobovi, D.: Parallelized rabin-karp method for exact string matching. In: IEEE Conference Paper (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. www.cs.rit.edu

  11. Orman, G.K., Labatut, V., Cherifi, H.: On accuracy of community structure discovery algorithms

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bae, S.H., Halperin, D., West, J., Rosvall, M., Howe, B.: Scalable flow-based community detection for large-scale network analysis

    Google Scholar 

  13. Žáková, K., Pištej, J., Bisták, P.: Online tool for student’s source code plagiarism detection. In: IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, Oct. 24–25 2013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, J., Cui, B., Xia, K.: A code comparison algorithm based on AST for plagiarism detection. In: 2013 Fourth International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technology

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kustanto, C., Liem, I.: Automatic source code plagiarism detection. In: 2009 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing

    Google Scholar 

  16. MD5 message digest Algorithm: www.cs.sjsu.edu/~stamp/CS265/projects/papersSpr03/MD5.ppt

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greeshma Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Greeshma Thomas, Ashwini Kumar, Kamal Bijlani, Aswathy, R. (2016). Phieval: Four-Phase Plagiarism Detection System in Private MOOCs. In: Shetty, N., Prasad, N., Nalini, N. (eds) Emerging Research in Computing, Information, Communication and Applications . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0287-8_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0287-8_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0287-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics