Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for the Identification of the Stages of Parkinson’s Disease

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence, Cyber Security and Computational Models

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 412))

Abstract

Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a degenerative disease of the central nervous system. This work performs a four-class classification using the motor assessments of subjects obtained from the Parkinson’s Progressive Markers Initiative (PPMI) database and a variety of techniques like Deep Neural Network (DNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Deep Belief Network (DBN) etc. The effect of using feature selection was also studied. Due to the skewness of the data, while evaluating the performance of the classifier, along with accuracy other metrics like precision, recall and F1-score were also used. The best classification performance was obtained when a feature selection technique based on Joint Mutual Information (JMI) was used for selecting the features that were then used as input to the classification algorithm like SVM. Such a combination of SVM and feature selection algorithm based on JMI yielded an average classification accuracy of 87.34 % and an F1-score of 0.84.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marek, K., Jennings, D., Lasch, S., Siderowf, A., Tanner, C., Simuni, T., et al.: The parkinson progression marker initiative (PPMI). Prog. Neurobiol. 95, 629–635 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babu, G.S., Suresh, S.: Parkinson’s disease prediction using gene expression-A projection based learning meta-cognitive neural classifier approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 1519–1529. Elsevier (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Das, R.: A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 1568–1572. Elsevier (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hazan, H., Hilu, D., Manevitz, L., Ramig, L.O., Sapir, S.: Early diagnosis of parkinson’s disease via machine learning on speech data. In: 2012 IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel (IEEEI), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mandal, I., Sairam, N.: Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis using robust inference system. Int. J. Med. Informatics 82, 359–377 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rustempasic, I., Can, M.: Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using fuzzy C-means clustering and pattern recognition. SouthEast Europe J. Soft Comput. 2, 42–49 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsanas, A., Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Spielman, J., Ramig L.O.: Novel speech signal processing algorithms for high-accuracy classification of Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59, 1264–1271 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Costin, H., Geman, O.: Parkinson’s disease prediction based on multistate markov models. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 8, 525–537 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daliri, M.R.: Chi-square distance kernel of the gaits for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 8, 66–70. Elsevier (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haller, S., Badoud, S., Nguyen, D., Garibotto, V., Lovblad, K.O., Burkhard, P.R.: Individual detection of patients with Parkinson disease using support vector machine analysis of diffusion tensor imaging data: initial results. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 33, 2123–2128 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martínez-Murcia, F.J., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Illán, I.A., Ortiz, A.: The Parkinson’s progression markers initiative.: automatic detection of parkinsonism using significance measures and component analysis in DaTSCAN imaging. Neurocomputing 126, 58–70. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prasanth, R., Roy, S.D., Mandal, P.K., Ghosh, S.: Automatic classification and prediction models for early Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from SPECT imaging. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 3333–3342. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Segovia, F., Górriz, J.M., Ramírez, J., Álvarez, I., Jiménez-Hoyuela, J.M., Ortega, S.J.: Improved Parkinsonism diagnosis using a partial least squares based approach. Med. Phys. 39, 4395–4403 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Armañanzas, R., Bielza, C., Chaudhuri, K.R., Martinez-Martin, P., Larrañaga, P.: Unveiling relevant non-motor Parkinson’s disease severity symptoms using a machine learning approach. Artif. Intell. Med. 58, 195–202. Elsevier (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Babu, G.S., Suresh, S., Mahanand, B.S.: A novel PBL-McRBFN-RFE approach for identification of critical brain regions responsible for Parkinson’s disease. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 478–488. Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gil, David, Johnson, Magnus: Diagnosing parkinson by using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Glob. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 9(4), 63–71 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoehn, M.M., Yahr, M.D.: Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17, 427–442 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleuret, F.: Fast binary feature selection with conditional mutual information. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 1531–1555 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, H.H., Moody, J.E.: Data visualization and feature selection: new algorithms for nongaussian data. In: NIPS, pp. 687–702 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, P.E., Bontempi, G.: On the use of variable complementarity for feature selection in cancer classification. In: EvoWorkshops 2006: EvoBIO, LNCS, pp. 91–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown, G., Pocock, A., Zhao, M.J., Luján, M.: Conditional likelihood maximisation: a unifying framework for information theoretic feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 27–66 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297. Springer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(27), 1–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vincent, P., Larochelle, H., Bengio, Y., Manzagol, P.A.: Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. In: ICML ’08 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1096–1103. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Palm, R.B.: Prediction as a candidate for learning deep hierarchical models of data. Master’s Thesis. Technical University of Denmark. IMM-M.Sc.-2012-31 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput. 18, 1527–1554 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

PPMI—a public-private partnership—is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners, including [list the full names of all of the PPMI funding partners found at http://www.ppmi-info.org/fundingpartners].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Karunya University, Coimbatore, India

    P. F. Deena & Kumudha Raimond

Authors
  1. P. F. Deena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kumudha Raimond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. F. Deena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Mathematics and Computational Sc, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Muthukrishnan Senthilkumar

  2. Applied Mathematics and Computational Sc, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Vijayalakshmi Ramasamy

  3. Applied Mathematics and Computational Sc, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Shina Sheen

  4. Applied Mathematics and Computational Sc, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    C. Veeramani

  5. Department of Mathematics, Ryerson University, TORONTO, Ontario, Canada

    Anthony Bonato

  6. Fac. Science&Technology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

    Lynn Batten

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deena, P.F., Raimond, K. (2016). Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for the Identification of the Stages of Parkinson’s Disease. In: Senthilkumar, M., Ramasamy, V., Sheen, S., Veeramani, C., Bonato, A., Batten, L. (eds) Computational Intelligence, Cyber Security and Computational Models. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 412. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0251-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0251-9_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0250-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0251-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation