Abstract
Time, cost, and quality are the three main challenges of the construction industry. This research chapter focuses on the different contractual obligations between the Public Works Department (PWD) standard form of contract and Persatuan Arkitek Malaysia (PAM)’s form of contract. Comparative studies of the cost-related clauses (the PAM and PWD Contract, With Quantities) have been carried out. The research aimed to investigate the cost-related issues faced by the construction parties by focusing on the applications and principles applied by the courts for disputes brought to courts by the suffering parties. This chapter deduces important lessons that must be fulfilled to avoid and minimise the cost-related disputes in the construction industry.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Supardi, A., Adnan, H., & Mohammad, M. F. (2011). Legal comparison between conditional and unconditional on performance bond in Malaysian construction contract. International Surveying Research Journal, 1(1), 45–55.
Rajoo, S., Davidson, W.S.W., & Singh, H. (2010). The pam 2006 standard form of building contract. Malaysia: LexisNexis.
Ndekugri, I. (1999). Performance bonds and guarantees: construction owners and professionals beware. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125, 428–436.
Tan, P. I., Low, K. S., Sum, P. M., & Chee, S. T. (2010). Handbook for pam 2006 contract (1st ed.). Malaysia: Pertubuhan Arkitek Malaysia.
Li, S. I., & Xie, D. F. (2012). Comparison of two ways of payment in construction contract. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 209–211, 1463–1466.
Supardi, A., Adnan, H., & Mohammad, M. F. (2010). Sub-contractors readiness on the Malaysian security of payment legislation in construction industry. In International Conference on Construction and Project Management, pp. 248–252.
Judi,S. S., & Abdul Rasyid, R. (2010). Contractor’s right of the action for late and non-payment by the employer. Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, 1(1), 65–95.
Ameer Ali, N. A. N. (2006). A construction industry payment and adjudication act: reducing payment-default and increasing dispute resolution efficiency in construction. Masters Builders, 3, 4–14.
Robinson, N., Lavers, A. P., Tan, G. K. H., & Chan, R. (1996). Construction law in Singapore and Malaysia (2nd ed.). Singapore: Butterworths Asia.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to acknowledge the support funding from the Research Management Institute (RMI), Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia under the Research Intensive Faculty (RIF) grant. Special thanks also go to the reviewers for their valuable comments on this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix—List of Cases
Appendix—List of Cases
-
Attorney General for the Falkland Islands v Gordon Forbes Construction (Falklands) Ltd. [2003] BLR 280
-
Bukit Cerakah Development Sdn. Bhd. v. L’Grande Development Sdn. Bhd. [2008] 2 AMR 597
-
Crittall Windows v T.J. Evers [1996] 54 Con LR 66
-
Cygal Bhd. v Bandar Subang Sdn. Bhd. [2004] 4 AMR 252 and Bakti Insani Sdn. Bhd. v Pembinaan BT Sdn. Bhd. & Anor OS D24 NCC 174-2011
-
Esal (Commodities) Ltd. & Reltor Ltd. v. Oriental Credit Ltd. & Wells Fargo Bank NA [1985] AC 546
-
Fasda Heights Sdn Bhd. v. Soon Ee Sing Construction Sdn Bhd [1999] 4 MLJ 199
-
Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Ltd. Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd. [1973] 71 LGR 162
-
Harrington & Co. Ltd. v Wooder [1914] AC 71
-
Hick v. Raymond & Reid [1983] AC 22
-
Kah Seng Construction Sdn. Bhd. v. Selsin Development Sdn. Bhd. [1997] 1 CLJ Supp 448
-
LEC Contractors Sdn. Bhd. v Castle Inn Sdn. Bhd. [2000] 3 AMR 2625
-
London Borough of Merton v. Stanley Hugh Leach [1985] 32 BLR 51
-
Lojan Properties Pte. Ltd. v. Tropicon Contractors Pte. Ltd.[1991] 2 MLJ 70
-
L’ Grande Development Sdn. Bhd. v. Bukit Cerakah Development Sdn. Bhd. [2007] 4 MLJ 518
-
Nafas Abadi Holdings Sdn. Bhd. v Putrajaya Holdings Sdn. Bhd. [2004] 1 LNS 127
-
Newacres Sdn. Bhd. v. Sri Alam Sdn. Bhd. [2000] 2 MLJ 353
-
Pembenaan Leow Tuck Chui & Sons Sdn. Bhd. v. Dr. Leela Medical Centre Sdn. Bhd. [1974] 2 MLJ 14
-
Rayack v. Lampeter Meat Co. Ltd. [1979] 12 BLR 30
-
Syarikat Panon Sdn. Bhd. v. Platinum Best Engineering Sdn. Bhd. [2011] 1 LNS 520
-
Thiam Electrical Construction Sdn. Bhd. v. Merino Odd Sdn. Bhd. [2009] 1 LNS 645
-
Tuck Sin Engineering & Construction Sdn. Bhd. v. Tee Hen Manufacturing (M) Sdn. Bhd. [2007] MJLU 416
-
Wates Construction (London) Ltd. v. Franthom Property Ltd. [1991] 53 BLR 23). Clause 30.6 (c)
-
Winstech Engineering (M) Sdn. Bhd. v. ESPL (M) Sdn. Bhd. [2011]1 LNS 811
-
Wright Ltd. v. P.H. & T (Holdings) Ltd. [1968] 13 BLR 26.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alwee, S.N.A.S., Hashim, H., Maisham, M., Mahat, N.A.A., Ahmad, N. (2016). Cost-Related Issues in Malaysian Construction Contracts. In: Abidin, S., Legino, R., Noor, H., Vermol, V., Anwar, R., Kamaruzaman, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium of Art and Design Education Research (i-CADER 2015). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0237-3_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0237-3_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0235-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0237-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)