Skip to main content

Top-down and/or Bottom-up Causality: The Notion of Relatedness in the Human Brain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (V)

Part of the book series: Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics ((ICCN))

Abstract

There is an unsettled debate in neuroscience on the question of neural processes underlying impressions of causality. Some favor perceptual (bottom-up), others cognitive/inferential (top-down) approaches. We here try to disentangle and apply new definitions to the functional categories “cognition” and “perception,” based on anatomically distinct neural processing systems in the human brain. Especially, the perceptual domain is not well defined, because it spans across “sensory”/morphological domains (non-lateralized) to “higher perceptual” domains (crossing of hemispheres in the visual cortex and correspondingly in the visual domain). Top-down influences very likely occur at different stages of neural information processing. Corresponding mental functions (sensing, perceiving, interpreting) might be integrated into one type of event during meaningful (meta-)cognition with extreme ends of the information dimension (0/1, causal/noncausal, or even/odd). We suggest that top-down “causation” and bottom-up “agency” are complimentary processes interacting across functional modalities and thereby forming one “unit” of explicit conscious experience/one “momentum” (Michotte in The perception of causality. Basic Books, Oxford, 1963 [1]; Kant in Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1781 [2]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Michotte, A.: The Perception of Causality. Basic Books, Oxford (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kant, I.: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781). In: von Weischedel, W. (ed.), Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schlottmann, A., Shanks, D.R.: Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 44, 321–342 (1992)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Badler, J.B., Lefevre, P., Missal, M.: Divergence between oculomotor and perceptual causality. J. Vis. 3, 1–15 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Badler, J.B., Lefevre, P., Missal, M.: Causality attribution biases oculomotor responses. J. Neurosci. 31, 517–525 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blakemore, S.J., et al.: The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 13, 837–844 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams, R.A., Shipp, S., Friston, K.J.: Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. Brain Struct Funct 218, 611–643 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Roser, M.E., et al.: Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology, 591–602 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fonlupt, P.: Perception and judgement of physical causality involve different brain structures. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 17, 248–254 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gobbini, M.I., et al.: Distinct neural systems involved in agency and animacy detection. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23(8), 1911–1920 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Young, M.E., Rogers, E.T., Beckmann, J.S.: Causal impressions: predicting when, not just whether. Mem Cogn 33, 320–331 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Straube, B., Chatterjee, A.: Space and time in perceptual causality. Front Hum Neurosci 4, 28 (2010)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wende, K.C., Straube, B., Stratmann, M., Sommer, J., Kircher, T., Nagels, A.: Neural correlates of continuous causal word generation. Neuroimage 62, 1399–1407 (2012)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. White, P.A.: The causal asymmetry. Psychol. Rev. 113, 132–147 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choi, H., Scholl, B.J.: Measuring causal perception: connections to representational momentum? Acta Psychol. 123, 91–111 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sartenaer, O.: Neither metaphysical dichotomy nor pure identity. Clarifying the emergentist creed. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 44(365), 373 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Acheson, D.J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J.R., Postle, B.R.: A common neural substrate for language production and verbal working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 1358–1367 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Crow, T.J.: Schizophrenia as the price that Homo sapiens pays for language: a resolution of the central paradox in the origin of the species. Brain Res. Rev. 4, 118–129 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crow, T.J.: The ʻbig bang’ theory of the origin of psychosis and the faculty of language. Schizophr. Res. 102, 31–52 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fletcher, P.C., Frith, C.D.: Perceiving is believing: a Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 48–58 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams, R.A., Perrinet, L.U., Friston, K.: Smooth pursuit and visual occlusion: active inference and oculomotor control in schizophrenia. PLoS One, United States, p. e47502 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sterzer, P., Kleinschmidt, A.: A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(1), 323–328 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Piaget, J.: The Child’s Conception of Physical Causality. Harcourt, Brace, New York (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Freeman, W.J.: Consciousness, intentionality, and causality. J. Conscious. Stud. 6, 143–172 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Freeman, W.J.: Mass Action in the Nervous System. Academic press, New York (1975). san 28

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wende, K.C., Nagels, A., Blos, J., Stratmann, M., Chatterjee, A., Kircher, T., Straube, B.: Differences and communalities in the judgment of causality in a physical and social context: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 51, 2572–2580 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jansen, A., Foel, A., Van Randenborgh, J., Konrad, C., Rotte, M., Forster, A.F., Deppe, M., Knecht, S.: Crossed cerebro-cerebellar language dominance. Hum. Brain Mapp. 24, 165–172 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Singer, T., Critchley, H.D., Preuschoff, K.: A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 334–340 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Craig, A.D.: How do you feel–now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 59–70 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. MacDonald, J.F., Jackson, M.F., Beazely, M.A.: Hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and signal amplification of NMDA receptors. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 18(1–2), 71–84 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Trehub, A.: Space, self, and the theater of consciousness. Conscious. Cogn, 310–330 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Blos, J., et al.: Neural correlates of causality judgment in physical and social context-the reversed effects of space and time. Neuroimage, 882–893 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Binder, J.R., Desai, R.H., Graves, W.W., Conant, L.L.: Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb. Cortex, United States, 2767–2796 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Friston, K., Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T., Moutoussis, M., Behrens, T., Dolan, R.J.: The anatomy of choice: dopamine and decision-making. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130481 (2014). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0481

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim C. Wende .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wende, K.C., Jansen, A. (2016). Top-down and/or Bottom-up Causality: The Notion of Relatedness in the Human Brain. In: Wang, R., Pan, X. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (V). Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0207-6_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics