Advertisement

Directions for Future Research

  • Shoko Konishi
  • Emi Tamaki
  • Jun Yoshinaga
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Population Studies book series (BRIEFSPOPULAT)

Abstract

In the earlier chapters of this book, we have shown, with limited evidence, that both the duration of lactational infecundability and time to pregnancy (TTP) may be longer among Japanese couples than among Western couples. Longer TTP can be linked to the relatively low coital frequency and prolonged duration of lactation found in couples and mothers in Japan, as well as to other factors such as long work hours, underweight, and overweight. The relatively longer TTP may be linked to the frequent use of ART among couples in Japan. Efficient use of ART, in terms of who should utilize these technologies and at what time, should be investigated in future studies to better meet couples’ needs. We confirm the widely held notions that many Japanese couples continue to rely on unreliable contraception and that induced abortion is common among both married and unmarried women. Conceptions that end in artificial abortions could have a significant impact on fertility trends in Japan if social and other circumstances allowed some of those conceptions to result in live births. It is also important to investigate the biological and sociocultural factors—e.g., exposure to chemical substances, body size, educational level, and working conditions—that may explain variations in TTP and other proximate determinants of fertility. In addition, a model-based approach would enable us to estimate the level of change in each sociocultural factor that would lead to changes in fertility through the modification of proximate determinants. We believe that the accumulation of such data will help us to understand why low levels of fertility persist in Japan.

Keywords

Underweight Overweight Chemical exposure Infertility treatment Lactational amenorrhea Time to pregnancy (TTP) Japan 

References

  1. 1.
    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2016. Summary report of the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2013 (Heisei 25nen kokumin kenkoeiyo chosa no gaiyo). Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huffman, Sandra L., Kathleen Ford, Hubert A. Allen Jr., and Peter Streble. 1987. Nutrition and fertility in Bangladesh: Breastfeeding and post partum amenorrhoea. Population Studies 41: 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peng, Y.K., V. Hight-Laukaran, A.E. Peterson, and R. Pérez-Escamilla. 1998. Maternal nutritional status is inversely associated with lactational amenorrhea in Sub-Saharan Africa: Results from demographic and health surveys II and III. Journal of Nutrition 128: 1672–1680.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konishi, Shoko, Soyoko Sakata, Mari S. Oba, and Kathleen A. O’Connor. Age and time to pregnancy for the first child among couples in Japan. The Journal of Population Studies (in press).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    John, A.Meredith, Jane A. Menken, and A.K.M. Alauddin Chowdhury. 1987. The effects of breastfeeding and nutrition on fecundability in rural Bangladesh: A hazards-model analysis. Population Studies 41: 433–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Homan, G.F., M. Davies, and R. Norman. 2007. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: A review. Human Reproduction Update 13: 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konkel, Lindsey. 2017. Mother’s milk and the environment: Might chemical exposures impair lactation? Environmental Health Perspectives 125: A17–A23.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Monga, Manoj, Bogdan Alexandrescu, Seth E. Katz, Murray Stein, and Theodore Ganiats. 2004. Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment, and sexual function. Urology 63: 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidt, Lone, Bjørn Holstein, Ulla Christensen, and Jacky Boivin. 2005. Does infertility cause marital benefit? An epidemiological study of 2250 women and men in fertility treatment. Patient Education and Counseling 59: 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leiblum, S.R., A. Aviv, and R. Hamer. 1998. Life after infertility treatment: a long-term investigation of marital and sexual function. Human Reproduction 13: 3569–3574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dyer, S., G.M. Chambers, J. de Mouzon, K.G. Nygren, F. Zegers-Hochschild, R. Mansour, O. Ishihara, M. Banker, and G.D. Adamson. 2016. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010. Human Reproduction 31: 1588–1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coale, A., and J. Trussell. 1996. The development and use of demographic models. Population studies 50: 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wood, James W., Patricia L. Johnson, and Kenneth L. Campbell. 1985. Demographic and endocrinological aspects of low natural fertility in highland New Guinea. Journal of Biosocial Science 17: 59–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shoko Konishi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Emi Tamaki
    • 2
  • Jun Yoshinaga
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Human Ecology, School of International Health, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of International Social SciencesGakushuin UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Life SciencesToyo UniversityGunmaJapan
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations