Skip to main content

Polyurethane Foams in Soil Stabilization: A Compressibility Effect

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
InCIEC 2015

Abstract

The use of polyurethane foam is so-called as a low cost technique in soil stabilization. The workable characteristic of polyurethane foam suits the construction needs which increase the strength performance while reducing the compression index. The research permits a reliable prediction of compressibility effects of stabilized soils in which the polyurethane foam contents are the variables. The unstabilized soils are taken from the current residential projects and the physical properties are investigated. The research is performed by an experimental work in accordance with BS 5930. The compressibility effects of stabilized (with the addition of polyurethane foams) and unstabilized soils are presented by the percentage of compression and swelling indices. These indices reduce between 40–50 % and the void ratio is also reduced between 30–50 % with the addition of polyurethane foams. The research also presents the physical and engineering properties of the stabilized and unstabilized soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Craig, R. F. (1992). Soil Mechanics. 6th Edition. Spon Press. London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Das. B. M, (2003),” Principle of Geotechnical Engineering, London, 7th Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Archibald, J.F., (2003), Effectiveness of Conventional Support Systems and Polymer Spray-on Liners for Reducing Hazards Associated with Rockbursting. Presented at the Mining Health and Safety Conference 2003, Sudbury, Ontario, April, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson et al. (1986), “The mechanics of Soil, An Introduction to Critical State soil Mechanics”, Mc Graw- Hill Book Company Limited, p 239.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noto, S. (1991). Peat Engineering Handbook. Civil engineering Research Institute Hokkaido development Agency, Prime Minister’s Office, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kazemian. S, and Huat, B.B.K, 2009, A Review of Stabilization of Soft Soil by Injection of Chemical Grouting. Australian J, Basic Application, Sci, 4(12):p5862–5868.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terzaghi, K & Peck. R.B, (1969). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. New York, 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Son, New York, 1967, 729 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karol R. H. (1990), Chemical Grouting, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 2nd edition, 465 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vinson, T. S., and Mitchell, J. K. (1970), “Foamed Plastic Chemical Systems for Lunar Soil Stabilization Applications,” Lunar Surface Engineering Properties Experiment Definition, Final Report presented to NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, V o l. I of IV, Jan. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eason, B. Noble, and I.N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955. (references)

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. I.S. Jacobs and C.P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G.T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds. New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Edil, T.B. (2003). “Recent advances in geotechnical characterization and construction over peat and organic soils” Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Advances in Soft Soil Engineering and Technology. (Eds). Malaysia: Putrajaya, pp: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gopalakrishnana, S and Sujathaa. R. (2011). “Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences “Ageing studies of cardanol based polyurethanes. Volume 2 Issue 3 Page No. 1069

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, G.H., Zhang, R.D, 2005.” Evaluation of soil water retention curve with the pore– solid fractal model”. Geoderma 127, 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sidek et al., “Environmental And Sustainable Technology Using Polyurethane Foam,” 2014. A. Conference and C. Engineering, “Annual Conference on Civil Engineering and Engineering (March 14–16 Phuket, Thailand) A1403-436,” pp. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Whitlow, (2001), “Basic Soil Mechanics”, Fourth Edition by Pearson Education South Asia Pte. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell, J.K, Fundamentals of Soil Behaviour, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1993, ch. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kazemian, S. and Huat, B.B.K, 2010 “Assessment of Stabilization Methods for Soft Soils by Admixtures,” 2010 International Conference on Scientific & Social Science Research (CSSR 2010), Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brady, N., Weil, R.R., (2002). The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 960 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ball, B.C. (2000). Soil Compatibility In Relation To Physical and Organic Properties at 156 sites in UK. Soil Tillage Res. 57, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bowles, J. E. (1979). Physical and geotechnical Properties of Soils. Mc Graw Hill. United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Skempton, A. W. (1954) “Notes on the Compressibility of Clay”, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, Vol.100, No 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Progrout Injection Sdn Bhd in providing the materials and technical data for this research. The authors would like to give an endless gratitude to UiTM Shah Alam (Faculty of Civil Engineering) for the support given in completing this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Sidek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sidek, N., Mohamed, K., Mohd Jais, I.B., Abu Bakar, I.A. (2016). Polyurethane Foams in Soil Stabilization: A Compressibility Effect. In: Yusoff, M., Hamid, N., Arshad, M., Arshad, A., Ridzuan, A., Awang, H. (eds) InCIEC 2015. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0155-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0155-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0154-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0155-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics