An Economic Valuation of Coastal Ecosystems in Phang Nga Bay, Thailand

  • Udomsak SeenprachawongEmail author


Conserving mangroves and coral reefs has become an increasingly important topic of public debate in developing countries like Thailand. This is particularly important to the mangroves and coral reefs in areas such as Phang Nga Bay, a bay along the coast of the provinces of Phuket, Phang Nga, and Krabi, Thailand. This study estimated the economic value of the changes to the quality of the mangroves and coral reefs ecosystems in Phang Nga Bay by using a choice experiment to value the economic impacts of the changes to the quality of coastal ecosystems in Phang Nga Bay. The welfare estimate indicates a willingness to pay (WTP) of THB 1133 (USD 28) per year for improved diversity of flora and fauna. Local livelihood (e.g., income from fishery) and ecological function (e.g., flood protection benefits) are tied as the second most important attributes of Phang Nga Bay. The rare and endangered species attribute is held as the least important attribute of Phang Nga Bay. The aggregate benefits were computed by multiplying the number of people in the beneficiary groups with the welfare estimate of improving Phang Nga Bay ecosystem—THB 2263 (USD 57) per person—yielding THB 5784 million (USD 144.6 million) per year.


Economic valuation Coastal ecosystem Choice experiment Entrance fee Thailand 


  1. Aksornkoae S (1998) Mangroves: ecology and management. Kasetsart University Press, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunpapong S, Ausavajitanond S (1991) Saving what’s left of tourism development at Patong Beach, Phuket, Thailand. In: Coastal zone’91, 1685–1697. American Society of Civil Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Gustavson K (2000) Capturing coral reef benefit values- financing marine environment conservation in Montego Bay, Jamaica. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanemann M (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 66:332–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hensher DA, Johnson LW (1981) Applied discrete choice modeling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic, New York, pp 105–142Google Scholar
  7. Phillips, A. 2000. Financing protected areas. Financing protected areas task force of the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN, in collaboration with the Economics Unit of IUCN. IUCN – The World Conservation Union, Gland/Cambridge, UK. viii + 58ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Seenprachawong U (2001) An economic analysis of coral reefs in the Andaman sea of Thailand. EEPSEA research report No. 2001-RR7. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  9. UNEP/IUCN (1987) Directory of coral reefs of international importance, vol 2, Indian Ocean, Red Sea and Gulf. UNEP regional sea directories and bibliographies. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. Wong PP (1995) Coastal and marine tourism in the Asian and pacific region: experience and impacts in coastal and marine environmental management: proceedings of a workshop bangkok, Thailand. Asian Development Bank, BangkokGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Development EconomicsNational Institute of Development AdministrationBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations