Skip to main content

The US National Ocean Policy: Priorities, Benefits, and Limitations in the Insular Pacific

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

We all share the ocean as a commons—the actions of any nation in the region directly impact the productivity and resource potential of every other nation. This is true with fisheries, with other marine natural resources, and even with security and maritime sovereignty. While the notion of ecosystem-based management within America is a noble goal, we must not forget the principal species of interest in the region, for commercial, recreational, and subsistence fisheries are highly migratory. Truly changing the paradigm with respect to fisheries, and ocean resource management as a whole, requires a collective effort of all parties. One nation can make a difference in how they interact with the environment, but the full Pacific community must work together to tackle our shared problems if we all expect to continue extracting benefit from the ocean for generations to come.

The new National Ocean Policy is a big step forward for the United States in how it manages and preserves its resources. Achieving that benefits proposed in the Policy will require careful consideration and collaboration between federal agencies, engagement of all maritime stakeholder communities on the adopting of new marine spatial plans, and sustained and suitable funding from the US Congress to advance critical initiatives, actions, and regulatory changes. If successfully implemented, the Policy has the potential to radically change the interactions of many nations with our collective ocean commons, something that provides direct domestic benefit to all coastal states, and indirect benefit to the world as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Commission on Ocean Policy. (2004). An ocean blueprint for the 21st century. Final report of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 20(3), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, H., Lenihan, H., Bourque, B., Bradbury, R., Cooke, R., Kay, M., Kidwell, S., Kirby, M., Peterson, C., & Jackson, J. (2006). Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science, 312(5781), 1806–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J., & Sutley, N. (2010). Proposed U.S. policy for ocean, coast, and Great Lakes stewardship. Science, 328(5985), 1485–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, A., Woodruff, R., & Hales, S. (2006). Climate change and human health: Present and future risks. The Lancet, 367(9513), 859–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Ocean Economics Program. (2014). State of the U.S. ocean and coastal economies.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2013). National coastal population report: Population trends from 1970 to 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2009, June 12). Memorandum from the President of the United States for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. “National Policy for the Oceans, our Coasts, and the Great Lakes.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2010). Executive Order 13547—Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes, 3 C.F.R 43021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Oceans Commission. (2003). America’s living oceans: Charting a course for sea change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (2009). Changing U.S. ocean policy can set a new direction for marine resource management. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton Commission. (1969). Our nation and the sea: A plan for national action; report. In Commission on marine science, engineering, and resources. Washington, DC: The Stratton Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, C., Morais, S., Ramos, S., Delerue-Matos, C., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P. (2011). Mercury, cadmium, lead, and arsenic levels in three pelagic fish species from the Atlantic Ocean: Intra- and inter-specific variability and human health risks for consumption. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49(4), 923–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). (2010). Final recommendations of the interagency policy taskforce.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris E. Ostrander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ostrander, C.E. (2016). The US National Ocean Policy: Priorities, Benefits, and Limitations in the Insular Pacific. In: Ishihara, M., Hoshino, E., Fujita, Y. (eds) Self-determinable Development of Small Islands. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0132-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics