Advertisement

How Can Cross-Sector Partnerships Be Made to Work Successfully? Lessons from the Mersey Basin Campaign (1985–2010)

  • Peter BateyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 24)

Abstract

Experience suggests that cross-sector partnerships can turn out to be a big disappointment: a cozy talking shop with plenty of warm words but not a lot of action to show for it. The Mersey Basin Campaign, however, was a major exception. As a government-sponsored 25-year initiative to clean up the rivers, canals, and estuary of the Mersey River Basin in North West England, the Campaign was a pioneer in public-private-voluntary partnership working and, in the period it was active (1985–2010), made great progress in improving water quality, promoting waterside regeneration, and engaging stakeholders, in a region with a history of severe industrial dereliction and pollution. In this paper, by a former leader of the Campaign, a number of themes are explored: Why was a Campaign needed? What did it try to achieve? How did it do this? What particularly factors led to successful partnership working?

Keywords

Partnership working River Mersey River basin management 

References

  1. Batey PWJ (2009) Comment: there may be no more Mersey basin campaign after 2010, but part of its legacy should be the innovative geographical notion on which it was founded. SourceNW 20:26Google Scholar
  2. Department of the Environment (DoE) (1983) Letter from Michael Heseltine and Government Consultation PaperGoogle Scholar
  3. EKOS Consulting (2006) Evaluation of the Mersey basin campaign; report to the government office north west. EKOS Consulting, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Elworthy S, Holder J (1997) Environmental protection: text and materials. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Gregory CE (2012) Enabling sustainable river futures: exploring institutional interventions. PhD thesis, University of Auckland. Available at: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/19480
  6. Handley JF, Wood R, Kidd SJ (1997) Building a healthier economy through a cleaner environment: mid-term report. Mersey Basin Campaign, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones PD (2000) The Mersey Estuary: back from the dead? Solving a 150-year old problem. J Chart Inst Water Environ Manag 14:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones PD (2006) Water quality and fisheries in the Mersey Estuary, England: a historical perspective. Mar Pollut Bull 53:144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kidd SJ, Shaw D (2000) The Mersey Basin and its River Valley Initiatives: an appropriate model for the management of rivers? Local Environ 5:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim JS, Batey PWJ (2001) A collaborative partnership approach to integrated waterside revitalization: the Mersey Basin Campaign, North West England. Int J Public Priv Partnerships 3:145–150Google Scholar
  11. Menzies W (2008) The river that changed the world. In: Scheibenbogen S (ed) River journeys. International Riverfoundation, Brisbane, pp 12–15Google Scholar
  12. Menzies W (2010) Partnership: no one said it would be easy. Town Plan Rev 81(4):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mersey Basin Campaign (1986) Mersey Basin Campaign: new life for the North West, unpublished documentGoogle Scholar
  14. Mersey Basin Campaign (1995) First Periodic Report: changing for the better. Mersey Basin Campaign, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  15. Newson MD (2009) Land, water and development, 3rd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Petts G, Heathcote J, Martin D (eds) (2002) Urban rivers: our inheritance and future. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Watson N (2005) The management of British rivers. In: Owen S, Pooley C, Folkard A, Park C, Clark G, Watson N (eds) Rivers and the British landscape. Carnegie, Lancaster, pp 169–194Google Scholar
  18. Wood R, Handley JF, Kidd SJ (1999) Sustainable development and institutional design: the example of the Mersey Basin Campaign. J Environ Plan Manag 43:341–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and PlanningUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations