Promotion Policies for Sustainable Energy Technologies: Case Studies in Japan

  • Susumu UchidaEmail author
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 24)


Sustainable energy technologies continue to be in the nascent stage for the most part. These characteristics should be considered when drafting promotion policies for such technologies. Using a socioeconomic model, this chapter simulates the effects of specific promotion policies for two particular sustainable energy technologies in Japan. An estimated input coefficient is used in the socioeconomic model analyzing thermal recovery from biomass, as actual market data are not available. The flows of energy and waste are also considered in the model. Restrictions on total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and subsidies for the thermal recovery industry funded by the emission tax were revealed to be effective toward promoting the industry. If actual market data, including those on pricing and products, are available for a certain time period (as they are for the residential photovoltaic market), a more detailed analysis is possible. In such cases, the socioeconomic and environmental simulation model may be combined with the growth model, which focuses on the cycle of cost decline created by the learning effect and environmental evaluation by consumers. The results of these simulations reveal the effectiveness of specific promotion policies, namely, a combination of GHG emission tax and subsidy, for sustainable energy industries.


Renewable energy Sustainable energy Model simulation Environmental evaluation Learning effect Emission tax 



This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25550045.


  1. Andress FJ (1954) The learning curve as a production tool. Harv Bus Rev 32:87Google Scholar
  2. Burniaux JM, Nicoletti G, Oliveira Martins J (1992) GREEN: a global model for quantifying the costs of policies to curb CO2 emissions. OECD Econ Stud 19:49–92Google Scholar
  3. Loulou R, Goldstein G, Noble K (2004) Documentation for the MARKAL family of models, Energy Technology Systems Analysis ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  4. Nansai K, Moriguchi Y, Tohno S (2002) Embodied energy and emission intensity data for Japan using input-output tables: inventory data for LCA. National Institute for Environmental Studies, TsukubaGoogle Scholar
  5. Uchida S, Higano Y (2006) An evaluation of the policy promoting energy recovery from wastes. Stud Reg Sci 36(1):21–35 (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Uchida S, Higano Y (2008) Diffusion model of renewable energies considering the learning effect and environmental value. J Jpn Soc Energy Res 29(3):15–21Google Scholar
  7. Uchida S, Higano Y (2010a) Evaluation of subsidy for residential photovoltaic by the learning and environmental evaluation model. Stud Appl Econ 3:46–58Google Scholar
  8. Uchida S, Higano Y (2010b) Comprehensive evaluation of a promotion policy for residential photovoltaic considering the cycle of learning and environmental evaluation. Stud Reg Sci 40(2):277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Uchida S, Mizunoya T, Higano Y (2008) A dynamic evaluation of policies to promote the use of the potential energy in wastes. Stud Reg Sci 38(2):339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ibaraki UniversityInashiki-gunJapan

Personalised recommendations