Advertisement

Note on the Framework for Disaster Impact Analysis with Environmental Consideration

  • Yasuhide OkuyamaEmail author
Chapter
  • 580 Downloads
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 24)

Abstract

Disaster, as the consequences of a natural hazard, poses a wide range of impacts in the human society and economy. Ever-increasing severity and intensity of natural hazards also threaten the environment where the human society and economy rely on the natural resources and the ecosystem where we live in. The current emphasis of disaster impact analysis has been on the socioeconomic aspects; however, the social and economic activities are certainly interlinked with and are influenced from the changes in the surrounding environment. In this chapter, the framework for extending disaster impact analysis to include the impacts on and from the natural environment is examined. The potential uses of the ECLAC methodology for the input data and of the environmentally extended social accounting matrix for the estimation methodology are reviewed and discussed, and the future directions are suggested.

Keywords

Disaster Impact analysis Environmental impact Social accounting matrix 

References

  1. Alarcón J, van Heemst J, de Jong N (2000) Extending the SAM with social and environmental indicators: an application to Bolivia. Econ Syst Res 12(4):473–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albala-Bertrand JM (2013) Disasters and the networked economy. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  3. de Haan M, Keuning SJ (1996) Taking the environment into account. Rev Income Wealth 42(2):131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duarte R, Flores M, Sanchez-Choliz J (2010) Environmental impacts of a regional economy: an application to the Argonese economy (Spain). Reg Sect Econ Stud 10(2):69–84Google Scholar
  5. Hallegatte S, Przyluski V (2010) The economics of natural disasters. CESifo Forum 2:14–24Google Scholar
  6. Keuning SJ (1993) An information system for environmental indicators in relation to the national accounts. In: de Vries WFM, den Bakker GP, Gircour MBG, Keuning SJ, Lenson A (eds) The value added of national accounting. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg, pp 287–305Google Scholar
  7. Keuning SJ (1994) The SAM and beyond: open, SESAME! Econ Syst Res 6(1):21–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morilla CR, Díaz-Salazar GL, Cardenete MA (2007) Economic and environmental efficiency using a social accounting matrix. Ecol Econ 60:774–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Okuyama Y (2007) Economic modeling for disaster impact analysis: past, present, and future. Econ Syst Res 19(2):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Okuyama Y (2015) The rise and fall of the Kobe economy from the 1995 earthquake. J Dis Res 10(4):635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Okuyama Y, Santos JR (2014) Disaster impact and input-output analysis. Econ Syst Res 26(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pal BD (2014) Identifying key sectors for green growth in India: an environmental social accounting matrix multiplier analysis, paper presented at the 22nd International Input-Output Conference, Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  13. Pyatt G, Roe AR (1977) Social accounting for development planning. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Pyatt G, Thorbecke E (1976) Planning techniques for a better future. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. Resosidarmo BP, Thorbecke E (1996) The impact of environmental policies on household incomes for different socio-economic classes: the case of air pollutants in Indonesia. Ecol Econ 17:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rose A (2004) Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. In: Okuyama Y, Chang SE (eds) Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Springer, New York, pp 13–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Siddiqi Y (2011) The economy and environment: an integrated approach for Canada. Paper presented at the 19th international input-output conference, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
  18. Srinivas H, Nakagawa Y (2008) Environmental implications of disaster preparedness: lessons learned from the Indian Ocean Tsunami. J Environ Manage 89:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stone JRN (1961) Input-output and national accounts. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Tran P, Shaw R (2007) Towards an integrated approach of disaster and environment management: a case study of Thus Thien Hue province, central Viet Nam. Environ Hazards 7:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tran P, Sonak S, Shaw R (2009) Disaster, environment and development: opportunities for integration in Asia-pacific region. In: Shaw R, Krishnamurthy RR (eds) Disaster management: global challenges and local solutions. University Press, HimayatnagarGoogle Scholar
  22. United Nations (2014) System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: central framework. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (UN ECLAC) (2003) Handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters. UN ECLAC, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN ISDR) (2002) Natural disasters and sustainable development: understanding the links between development, environment and natural disasters, background document for the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) No.5Google Scholar
  25. Wang Q, Gu G, Higano Y (2006) Toward integrated environmental management for challenges in water environmental protection of Lake Taihu basin in China. Environ Manag 37(5):579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. West CT, Lenze DG (1994) Modeling the regional impact of natural disaster and recovery: a general framework and an application to Hurricane Andrew. Int Reg Sci Rev 17:121–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. World Bank (2010) Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: the economics of effective prevention. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. World Bank (2012) Thai flood 2011: overview. The World Bank, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  29. Xie J (2000) An environmentally extended social accounting matrix: conceptual framework and application to environmental policy analysis in China. Environ Res Econ 16(4):391–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xie J, Saltzman S (2000) Environmental policy analysis: an environmental computable general-equilibrium approach for developing countries. J Policy Model 22(4):453–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KitakyushuKitakyushuJapan

Personalised recommendations