Advertisement

Bringing Media Literacy Education into the School Curriculum: A Trilevel Adoption of Innovation Model

  • Alice Y. L. LeeEmail author
  • Chi-Kim Cheung
  • Meily Cheung
Chapter

Abstract

This study views media literacy education as an educational innovation and examines what factors affect the adoption of media education in secondary schools in Hong Kong. Diffusion of innovations and the sociology of consumer behavior constitute the theoretical foundation of this study. Findings indicate that although teachers are important agents in the adoption of a media literacy education initiative, they are also under school resource constraints and affected by the social climate of education reform. This study further develops the theory of diffusion of innovations by adding the societal factor into the traditional model. It proposes a holistic innovation adoption model in which individual, organizational, and societal factors all contribute to the adoption of media literacy education in Hong Kong schools.

Keywords

Secondary schools Hong Kong Innovation model Diffusion model 

References

  1. Bussey, J. M., Formody, T. J., & Vanleeuwen, D. (2000). Some factors predicting the adoption of technology education in New Mexico public schools. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calderhead, J., & Gates, P. (Eds.). (1993). Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, D. W. (2000a). Vision, task, and hope: The Hong Kong education reform movement in the 21st century. Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, D. W. (2000b). Learning and teaching through the multiple-intelligences perspective: Implications for curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 187–201.Google Scholar
  5. Cheung, C. K. (2004). Media education in Hong Kong schools: Possibilities and challenges. Educational Studies, 30(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheung, C. K. (2009a). Education reform as an agent of change: The development of media education in Hong Kong during the last decade. Comunicar, 32(16), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheung, C. K. (2009b). Integration media education into liberal studies: A positive response to curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Curriculum Journal, 20(4), 437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung, C. K. (2009c). Media education across four Asian societies: Issues and themes. International Review of Education, 55, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole, A. L., & Knowles, J. G. (2000). Researching teaching: Exploring teacher development through reflexive inquiry. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Curriculum Development Council. (2000). Learning to learn: the way forward in curriculum development. Hong Kong: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  11. Curriculum Development Council. (2005). Proposed new senior secondary curriculum and assessment framework. Hong Kong: Education and Manpower Bureau.Google Scholar
  12. Curriculum Development Council. (2007). Liberal studies: Curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Education and Manpower Bureau.Google Scholar
  13. Dooley, K. E. (1999). Towards a holistic model for the diffusion of educational technologies: An integrative review of educational innovation studies. Education Technology & Society, 2(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  14. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  15. Education Commission. (2000). Review of education system: reform proposals. Hong Kong: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  16. Fullan, M. (1991). The curriculum change. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 279–280). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Groves, M., & Zemel, P. (2000). Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: Development and application of a new framework. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 51–85.Google Scholar
  18. Heng, L. W., & Khim, T. S. (2004). Reflective practice in Malaysian teacher education: Assumptions, practices, and challenges. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
  19. Hong Kong Association of Media Education. (2005). A response to the reform proposal on secondary education. Brief submitted to the Education and Manpower Bureau, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, A. Y. L. (2002). Media education movement in Hong Kong: A networking model. Mass Communication Research, 71, 107–131.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, A. Y. L. (2003a). Media education and civic consciousness. In P. S. N. Lee (Ed.), New perspectives on Hong Kong media (pp. 231–250). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, A. Y. L. (2003b). The media education network in Hong Kong and the key trends of world communication. In B. Duncan & K. Tyner (Eds.), Visions/Revisions: Moving forward with media education (pp. 149–158). Madison: National Telemedia Council.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, A. Y. L. (2007). Media education, critical citizenship and public sphere: The ideal and practice of media education in Hong Kong. The Chinese Journal of Communication and Society, 1(3), 134–155Google Scholar
  24. Lee, A. Y. L., & Mok, E. (2005). Media education and the nurturing of young active learners in a knowledge society. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, the Instructional & Developmental Communication Division, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Mclaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mcquail, D., & Windahl, S. (1993). Communication models: For the study of mass communication. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  27. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. (1993). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and theory. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  28. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. (1971). Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Surry, D. W., & Farguhar, J. D. (1997). Diffusion theory and instructional technology. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 2(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
  33. Yates, B. L. (2004). Applying diffusion theory: Adoption of media literacy programs in schools. Studies in Media & Information Literacy Education, 4(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yiu, M. T. (2001, December). Media education and education reform. A speech delivered at the seminar of bringing media into the classroom, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  35. Wallendorf, M., & Zaltman, G. (Eds.). (1984). Readings in consumer behavior: Individuals, groups and organization. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Zaltman, G., & Wallendorf, M. (1983). Consumer behavior: Basic findings and management implications. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice Y. L. Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chi-Kim Cheung
    • 2
  • Meily Cheung
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Journalism, School of CommunicationHong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  3. 3.School of CommunicationHang Seng Management CollegeHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations