Advertisement

Not the “ASEAN Way”: The Southern Philippines Conflict and Its Internationalization

  • Stephen C. DruceEmail author
Chapter
  • 713 Downloads
Part of the Asia in Transition book series (AT, volume 3)

Abstract

The chapter discusses the long-running conflict in the Southern Philippines between the Bangsa Moro and the Philippine government. The conflict stands in contrast to other intrastate conflicts in ASEAN as it has long attracted the attention and involvement of the international community. The chapter traces the origins of the conflict, the rise of secessionist movements and the various peace processes to the present day that have attempted to find a peaceful resolution. In particular, it focuses on the role of external international actors in ameliorating incompatibilities between the two sides and their fundamental role in the various peace processes, such as mediation and the formulation of peace frameworks leading eventually to the 2014 Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (CAB).

Keywords

Bangsa Moro Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) Tripoli Agreement Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) Secession and autonomy Henry Dunant Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue (HD Centre) International Monitoring Team (IMT) International Contact Group (ICG) Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (CAB) 

References

  1. Ǻkebo, M. (2011). The role of external actors in managing peace processes in Asia: An overview of attempts in Aceh, Mindanao and Sri Lanka. In R. Amer & K. Zou (Eds.), Conflict management and dispute settlement in East Asia (pp. 83–106). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Aljunied, S. M. K., & Curaming, R. A. (2012). Mediating and consuming memories of violence: The Jabidah massacre in the Philippines. Critical Asian Studies, 44(2), 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacani, B.G. (2005). The Mindanao peace talks: Another opportunity to resolve the moro conflict in the Philippines. United States Institute for peace (USIP): Special reports (131). http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/sr131.pdf. Accessed April 06, 2015.
  4. Bancani, B.G. (2006, November 27). Peace with the moros of the Philippines: An independent assessment. Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. http://www.osloforum.org/sites/default/files/PeacewiththeMoros.pdf. Accessed April 05, 2015.
  5. Buendia, R. (2005). The State-moro armed conflict in the Philippines: Unresolved national question or question of governance? Asian Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 109–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. (2015). Philippines, Mindanao. http://www.hdcentre.org/en/our-work/peacemaking/philippines-mindanao, Accessed June 07, 2015.
  7. Che Man, W. K. (1990). Muslim separatism: The moros of Southern Philippines and the malays of Southern Thailand. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
  8. CNN Philippines (2015). Decommissioning is first step to real peace, not surrender—MILF. http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2015/06/16/MILF-on-its-decommissioning-First-step-to-real-peace-not-surrender.html. Accessed July 20, 2015.
  9. Ferrer, M. C. (2005). The moro and the Cordillera conflicts in the Philippines and the struggle for autonomy. In K. Snitwongse & W. S. Thompson (Eds.), Ethnic conflicts in Southeast Asia (pp. 109–150). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  10. GOVPH Official Gazette. (2012, October 15). Speech of president Aquino during the signing of the GPH-MILF framework agreement on the Bangsamoro. http://www.gov.ph/2012/10/15/speech-of-president-aquino-during-the-signing-of-the-gph-milf-framework-agreement-october-15-2012, Accessed June 07, 2015.
  11. Gopinath, A. (1991). International aspects of the Thai muslim and Philippine muslim issues: A comparative study. In K. M. de Silva & R. J. May (Eds.), Internationalization of ethnic conflict (pp. 125–147). London: International Centre for Ethnic Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Gowing, P. G. (1979). Muslim Filipinos-heritage and horizon. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Gross, M. L. (2007). A Muslim archipelago: Islam and politics in Southeast Asia. Washington, D.C.: National Defense Intelligence College.Google Scholar
  14. Herbolzheimer, K., & Leslie, E. (2013). Innovation in mediation support: The international contact group in Mindanao. London: Conciliation resources. http://www.c-r.org/sites/c-r.org/files/PracticePaper_MindanaoICG_ConciliationResources_0.pdf. Accessed April 08, 2015.
  15. International Crisis Group (2008). The Philippines: The collapse of peace in Mindanao. ICG Asia Briefing No. 83, October 23, 2008. Jakarta/Brussels.Google Scholar
  16. International Crisis Group (2012). The Philippines: Breakthrough in Mindanao. ICG Asia Report No. 240, December 05, 2012. Jakarta/Brussels.Google Scholar
  17. Majul, C. A. (1985). The contemporary muslim movement in the Philippines. Berkeley: Mizan Press.Google Scholar
  18. McKenna, T. M. (1998). Muslim rulers and rebels: Everyday politics and armed separatism in the Southern Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May, R. J. (1992). The wild west in the south: A recent political history of Mindanao. In M. Turner, R. J. May, & L. R. Turner (Eds.), Mindanao: Land of unfulfilled promise (pp. 125–146). Quezon City: New Da.Google Scholar
  20. Memorandum of Agreement. (2008). Memorandum of agreement on the ancestral domain aspect of the GRP-MILF tripoli agreement on peace of 2001. http://pcdspo.gov.ph/downloads/2012/10/MOA-%E2%80%93-Ancestral-Domain-August-5-2008.pdf. Accessed April 05, 2015.
  21. Miller, H. (Ed.). (1934). Treaties and other international acts of the United States of America (Vol. 4, documents 80–121; 1836–46). Washington: United States government printing office.Google Scholar
  22. Saleeby, N. (1908). The history of Sulu. Manila: Bureau of Printing.Google Scholar
  23. Saravanamuttu, J. (2011). Conflict management in the southern Philippines and its implications for regionalism. In R. Amer & K. Zou (Eds.), Conflict management and dispute settlement in East Asia (pp. 65–82). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. University for Peace and Conflict. (2009). Northern Ireland Peace encouragement to Philippines. http://www.monitor.upeace.org/archive.cfm?id_article=578. Accessed June 16, 2015.
  25. United States Institute of Peace. (n. d.). Strategic plan 2014–2019. http://www.usip.org/about-us/strategic-plan. Accessed June 25, 2015.
  26. United States Institute of Peace. (2008). Toward peace in the Southern Philippines: A summary and assessment of the USIP Philippine facilitation project, 2003–2007. http://www.usip.org/publications/toward-peace-in-the-southern-philippines, Accessed June 25, 2015.
  27. Vellema, S., Saturnino, M., Borras, J. R., Francisco, L. J. R., et al. (2011). The agrarian roots of contemporary violent conflict in Mindanao, Southern Philippines. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(3), 298–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, T. (2010). The MoA-AD debacle—An analysis of individuals’ voices, provincial propaganda and national disinterest. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(1), 121–144.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universiti Brunei DarussalamBandar Seri BegawanBrunei Darussalam

Personalised recommendations