Abstract
The downfall of giant corporations revealed coalitions of the crime by key players in the organizations, most importantly including accounting professionals who have access to finance and control. The remedy for such coalitions is crucial in order to suppress corporate crime from threatening the global economy. For such reasons, there rise the needs to look at corporate crime in the perspective of the accounts professionals who play some of the most important role in the prevention measures. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the level of tolerance toward corporate crime behaviors in the perception of accounting professionals in Malaysia. Questionnaire was used in this study to seek MIA members’ feedback about 15 given corporate crime scenarios which cover various types of corporate crime. The results indicate that accounting professionals in Malaysia show the lowest tolerance level toward fraud attempts while giving relatively the highest tolerance level toward promoting buddy situations in corporate crime. Furthermore, the result shows that there is a significant difference in scores for those who have formal religious and groups who do not have formal religious education. The results also indicate lower likelihood to corporate crime tolerance for those who have formal religious education in relation to those without formal religious education, thus suggesting for formal religious educational background as an important indication to lower the propensity for corporate crime behaviors in the future.
Identify applicable sponsor/s here. If no sponsors, delete this text box (sponsors)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agrawal, Chadha S (2005) Corporate governance and accounting scandals. J Law Econ 48:371–406
Baucus M, Near JP (1991) Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? An event history analysis. Acad Manag J 34:9–36
Clinard M, Quinney R (1973) Criminal behaviour systems: a typology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Creswell JW (2002) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative approaches to research. Merrill/Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River
Fenwick M (2006) The mouse race before the rat race. Master thesis, University of Leeds
George D, Mallery P (2001) SSPS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, (10.0 update 3rd ed). Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights
Knouse SB, Giacalone RA (1992) Ethical decision-making in business: behavioral issues and concern. J Bus Ethics 11:369
KPMG Malaysia (2009) The KPMG Malaysia fraud survey report. KPMG. Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from www.kpmg.com/MY/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/2010/KPMG-Malaysia-Fraud-Survey-Report-2009.pdf. 27 Jan 2013
Pallant J (2005) SPSS survival manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (version 12). Allen and Unwin, Australia
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009) The global economic crime survey. PriceWaterHouseCoopers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/economic-crime-survey/pdf/global-economic-crime-survey-2009.pdf. 23 Jan 2013
Puah C-H, Voon S-L, Entebang H (2008) Factors stimulating corporate crime in Malaysia. MPRA. Retrieved on September 24, 2010 from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10679/MPRA
Salkind NJ (2003) Exploring research, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Sekaran U (2005) Research methods for business: a skill-building approach, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
Shover N, Wright JP (2001) Crimes of privilege: readings in white-collar crime. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sidhu AS (2006) Crime levels and trends in the next decade. J Kuala Lumpur R Malays Police Coll 5:1–13
Simon D (2002) Elite deviance. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
Sutherland EH (1949) White collar crime. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
Szwajkowski E (1985) Organizational illegality: theoretical integration and illustrative application. Acad Manag J 10:558–567
The Federal Law Group (2011) Corporate crimes. Retrieved January 8, 2011, from http://www.federallawgroup.com/PracticeAreas/corporate_crimes.asp
Vitell SJ, Hidalgo ER (2006) The impact of corporate ethical values and enforcement of ethical codes on the perceived importance of ethics in business: a comparison of U.S. and Spanish managers. J Bus Ethics 64(1):31–43
Voon ML, Voon SL, Puah CH (2008) An empirical analysis of the determinants of corporate crime in Malaysia. Int Appl Econ Manag Lett 1(1):13–17
Weisburd D, Wheeler S, Waring E, Bode N (1991) Crimes of the middle classes: white-collar offenders in the federal courts. Yale University Press, New Haven
Wood JA, Longenecker JG, McKinney JA, Moore CW (1988) Ethical attitudes of students and business professionals: a study of moral reasoning. J Bus Ethics 7(4):249–257
Zahra S, Priem R, Rasheed A (2007) Understanding the causes and effects of top management fraud. Organ Dyn 36(2):122–139
Acknowledgment
The research was financially supported by the Accounting Research Institute (ARI) and Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abdullah, W.N., Said, R., Saad, S.M., Omar, N. (2016). Corporate Crime Tolerance of Accounting Professionals in Malaysia. In: Mohd Sidek, N., Ali, S., Ismail, M. (eds) Proceedings of the ASEAN Entrepreneurship Conference 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0036-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0036-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0034-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0036-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)