Skip to main content

Preliminary Data Analysis and Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Governance and Citizenship in Asia ((GOCIA))

Abstract

This chapter provides the preliminary data analysis and interpretation of the findings. First, the chapter outlines the sampling results covering data collection procedures, demographic data of the companies and demographic data of the respondents. It then proceeds with screening the data to detect errors, missing data and outliers. Next, the discussion focuses on refining of measures to assess the reliability and validity of the scales. The analysis involves Cronbach’s alpha, variance extracted measure and construct reliability to confirm the reliability of the scales. To test the goodness of measures, the study draws on content validity, convergent validity and discriminant validity. Then, results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis are discussed. This is followed by the assessment of conformity with structural equation modelling (SEM) assumptions to check if the data satisfied the assumptions of sample size; normality, linearity and homoscedasticity; and multicollinearity. Finally, the chapter delineates the assessment of the measurement model to establish convergent and discriminant validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amick, D. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1975). Introductory multivariate analysis. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychology Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Edwards, J. R. (1998). A general approach to construct validation in organisational research: Application to the measurement of work values. Organisational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982). Representing and testing organisational theories. A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(3), 459–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: New developments and techniques. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business research method. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., & Small, N. J. H. (1978). Testing multivariate normality. Biometrika, 65(2), 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 1(2), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organisational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 626–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. O. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wan, H.L. (2016). Preliminary Data Analysis and Interpretation. In: Organisational Justice and Citizenship Behaviour in Malaysia. Governance and Citizenship in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0030-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics