Skip to main content

Hazard Source Characterization and Propagation II: Fragment s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk Analysis and Management: Engineering Resilience
  • 1928 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter presents a hazard propagation model for solid objects. A basic approach to describe the fragment and debris launch and distribution in case of explosive events is given, which is often only based on experimental data. It offers the opportunity to (geo-) locate three-dimensional threat trajectories in space. A little similar approaches are of interest when tracing the dispersion of solid agents or fluids. The assumptions of the presented approach are given. In particular, it is not valid for the near field. The chapter shows how a sufficient hazard source description relates to the hazard propagation modeling: the former should contain sufficient information for the later. However, it is not show in detail how the fragment launch conditions are obtained experimentally, by analytical-empirical models or by computational continuum-mechanical simulation. The modeling and visualization of hazards requires the use of natural coordinate systems: the coordinate system for the hazard source, coordinate systems for objects in the surroundings of the hazard source, for the visualization of earth’s surface and for modeling the forces on earth’s surface that influence the hazard propagation. The chapter presents a minimum of such coordinate systems and how they are transformed to each other. For describing the physics of the propagation, geometry properties of the objects propagating and the properties of the medium they are propagating through are necessary to determine the physical forces acting on the propagating objects. The given definitions of various hazard densities of explosions are an example of quantifying parameters for representing the time-dependent 3D hazard field on a surface of interest. It is carefully distinguished between the representation of the hazard potential and its interpretation in terms of potential damage. The chapter also illustrates that computational simulation and its visualization are a powerful tool to model the propagation of hazards, in particular also allowing to take account of the scenario geometry, e.g. of barriers close to the hazard source or close to objects at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aschmoneit, T. (2011). EMI Bericht E 20/11. Fraunhofer EMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bill, B. (2010). Grundlagen der Geo-Informations systeme. Wichmann: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörr, A., Rübarsch, D., Gürke, G., & Michael, K. (2003). Fraunhofer EMI Bericht E 10/03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elert, G. (2013). Aerodynamic Drag. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from http://physics.info/drag/

  • Häring, I., Schönherr, M., & Richter, C. (2009). Quantitative hazard and risk analysis for fragments of high explosive shells in air. Reliability and System Safety Engineering, 94(9), 1461–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salhab, R. G. (2012). Integral expressions for trajectory-based fragment density computations of explosions. Freiburg im Breisgau: Diplom, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salhab, R. G., Häring, I. & Radtke, F. K. F. (2011a). Formalization of a quantitative risk analysis methodology for static explosive events. In G. G. S. Bérenguer & G. Soares (Eds.), ESREL 2011 Annual Conference (pp. 1311–1320). Troyes, France: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salhab, R. G., Häring, I. & Radtke, F. K. F. (2011b). Fragment launching conditions for risk analysis of explosion and impact scenarios. In G. G. S. Bérenguer & G. Soares (Eds.), ESREL 2011 Annual Conference (pp. 1579–1587). Troyes, France: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slepian, Z. (2012). The average projected area theorem—Generalization to higher dimensions. arXiv:1109.0595v4 [math.DG].

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical test center WTD 91. (2012). Meppen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical test center WTD 52. (2013). Oberjettenberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical test center WTD 91. (2014). Meppen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • USA Department of Defense. (1999). Department of Defense World Geodetic System (WGS), National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. (2000). Schrittweitenanpassung. Retrieved August 20, 2013, from http://www.stellarcom.org/aw/Physik/cp/node39.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo Häring .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Häring, I. (2015). Hazard Source Characterization and Propagation II: Fragment s. In: Risk Analysis and Management: Engineering Resilience. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0015-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0015-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0013-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0015-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics