Skip to main content

Beyond Compliance

Supporting the Transition of English Language Learners with Special Needs

  • Chapter
Transitioning Children with Disabilities

Part of the book series: Studies in Inclusive Education ((STUIE))

  • 496 Accesses

Abstract

English Language Learners are the fastest growing population of students in U.S. public schools. Currently, there are 5 million students who receive second language support services and it is estimated that 1 in 4 students in public schools will have English as their second language by 2025 (United States Department of Education, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barrera, M., & Liu, K. K. (2006). Involving parents of english language learners with disabilities through instructional dialogues. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 19(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., & Liu, K. K. (2010). Challenges of general outcomes measurement in the RTI progress monitoring of linguistically diverse exceptional learners. Theory into Practice, 49(4), 273–280. doi:10.1080/00405841.2010.510713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, C. S., & Reyes, E. I. (1996). Conversations with a Latina teacher about education for language-minority students with special needs. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottiani, J. H., Bradshaw, C. P., Rosenberg, M. S., Hershfeldt, P. A., Pell, K. L., & Debnam, K. J. (2012). Applying double check to response to intervention: Culturally responsive practices for students with learning disabilities. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 9(1), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, B., Valent, A., & Danielson, L. (2013). Improving college and career readiness for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: College and Career Readiness and Success Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 98 F. Supp. 797 (D. Kan. 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, E., Haas, E., & Ferriere, K. (2015). Identifying and supporting English learner students with learning disabilities: Key issues in the literature and state practice (REL 2015–086). Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (2009). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosnoe, R. (2009). Family-school connections and the transitions of low-income youths and English language learners from middle school to high school. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 1061–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism Toronto, 19, 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMatthews, D. E., Edwards, D. B., & Nelson, T. E. (2014). Identification problems: US special education eligibility for English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 27–34. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Valenzuela, J. S., & Niccolai, S. L. (2004). Language development in culturally and linguistically diverse students with special education needs. In L. Baca & H. Cervantes (Eds.), The bilingual special education interface (4th ed., pp. 125–161). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 (EEOA), 20 U.S.C. section 1703(f) (Supp. 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, S., & Jones-Vo, S. (2010). Differentiating instruction and assessment for English language learners: A guide for K/12 teachers. Philadelphia, PA; Caslon Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, C. R., Chiang, B., Van Haren, B., Jorgensen, J., Halberg, S., & Boreson, L. (2008). Culturally responsive practices in schools: A checklist to address disproportionality in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(5), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. B., & Ortiz, A. A. (2008). A framework for culturally and linguistically responsive design of response-to-intervention models. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11(1), 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, S. B., & Ortiz, A. A. (2013). Intersectionality as a framework for transformative research in special education. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 13(2), 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, M., Katz, A., & Ernst-Slavit, G. (2009). Paper to practice: Using the TESOL English language proficiency standards in PreK-12 classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, G. (2014). Transition of culturally and linguistically diverse youth with disabilities: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40(3), 239–245. doi:10.3233/JVR-140689

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, A. S. (1985). Transition: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 51(6), 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez Finch, M. E. (2012). Special considerations with response to intervention and instruction for students with diverse backgrounds. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 285–296. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.21597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. J., & Patton, J. R. (2005). Differentiating curriculum and instruction for English-language learners with special needs. Intervention in School & Clinic, 40(4), 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, J. J., Klingner, J. K., Baca, L. M., & Patton, J. M. (2008). Methods for teaching culturally and linguistically diverse exceptional learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, T. L. (2014). Learners of mathematics: High school students’ perspectives of culturally relevant mathematics pedagogy. Journal of African American Studies, 18(3), 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingner, J. K., & Edwards, P. A. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., & Barletta, L. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, P. D. (1996). Taxonomy for transition programming. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liasidou, A. (2013). Bilingual and special educational needs in inclusive classrooms: Some critical and pedagogical considerations. Support for Learning, 28(1), 11–16. doi:10.1111/1467-9604.12010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P. T., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Determining English language learners’ response to intervention: Questions and some answers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May 25th Memorandum. 35 Fed Register 11595 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maye, D., & Day, B. (2012). Teacher identities: The fingerprint of culturally relevant pedagogy for students at risk. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 78(2), 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzotti, V. L., Rowe, D. A., Cameto, R., Test, D. W., & Morningstar, M. E. (2013). Identifying and promoting transition evidence-based practices and predictors of success: A position paper of the division on career development and transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36(3), 140–151. doi:10.1177/2165143413503365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzotti, V. L., Test, D. W., & Mustian, A. L. (2014). Secondary transition evidence-based practices and predictors: Implications for policymakers. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25(1), 5–18. doi:10.1177/1044207312460888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer v. Nebraska. 262 U.S. 390, 43 S. Ct. 625, 67 L. Ed. 1042 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morningstar, M., & Mazzotti, V. (2014). Teacher preparation to deliver evidence-based transition planning and services to youth with disabilities (Document No. IC-1). Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. Retrieved from http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/

  • National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI-A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center on Educational Outcomes. (2011). Understanding subgroups in common state assessments: Special education students and ELLs (NCEO Brief. Number 4). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., & Wei, X. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, L. A., Madaus, J. W., & Javitz, H. S. (2016). Effect of transition planning on postsecondary support receipt by students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 497–514. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014402915615884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). (2001). Public Law 107-110, 115 Statute 1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orelus, P. W., & Hills, M. D. (2010). Rethinking literacy development of bilingual students with special needs: Challenges, struggles and growth. International Journal of Special Education, 25(2), 136–147. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014402915615884

    Google Scholar 

  • Orosco, M. J., & Klingner, J. (2010). One school’s implementation of RTI with english language learners: “Referring into RTI”. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 269–288. Retrieved frpm http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355474

  • Orosco, M. J., & O’Connor, R. (2014). Culturally responsive instruction for English language learners with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(6), 515–531. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219413476553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, A. A., & Yates, J. R. (2001). A framework for serving English language learners with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 14(2), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paneque, O. M., & Rodriguez, D. (2009). Language use by bilingual special educators of English language learners with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 24(3), 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Magee, J., Martinez, A., Willner, L., & Paul, J. (2016). English language learners with disabilities: A call for additional research and policy guidance. Washington, DC: CCSSO

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, S. V., Rao, S., & Protacio, M. S. (2015). Converging recommendations for culturally responsive literacy practices: Students with learning disabilities, English language learners, and socioculturally diverse learners. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(3), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, S. (2015). Unaccompanied child migrants in U.S. communities, immigration court and schools. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Plyer v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 102 S. Ct. 2382, 72 L. Ed. 2d 786 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. N., Hauerwas, L. B., & Brown, R. D. (2014). State policy and guidance for identifying learning disabilities in culturally and linguistically diverse students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(3), 172–185. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0731948713507261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shifrer, D., Muller, C., & Callahan, R. (2011). Disproportionality and learning disabilities: Parsing apart race, socioeconomic status, and language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 246–257. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219410374236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, S. D. (2016, May 11). Teaching English learners: What does the research tell us? Education Week, pp. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, J. (2016). Funding on equitable education for English learners in the United States. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. L. (2011). Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Exceptional Children, 77(3), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, A. A., Murray, A., & Kim, H. (2014). Postsecondary transition and English learners with disabilities: Data from the second national longitudinal transition study (WCER Working Paper No. 2014-4). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, A., Murray, A., & Kim, H. (2016). English learners with disabilities in high school: Population characteristics, transition programs, and postschool outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 37(3), 146–158. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932515626797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education. (2013). The biennial report to congress on the implementation of the title III state formulas grant program, school years 2008–10. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utley, C. A., Obiakor, F. E., & Bakken, J. P. (2011). Culturally responsive practices for culturally and linguistically diverse students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 9(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, T. (2004). Teaching English language learners: The how-to handbook. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanzek, J., Swanson, E., Vaughn, S., Roberts, G., & Fall, A. M. (2016). English learner and non-English learner students with disabilities: Content acquisition and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 428–442. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0014402915619419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westminster School Dist. of Orange County v. Mendez, 161 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetlin, A., Beltran, D., Salcido, P., Gonzalez, T., & Reyes, T. (2011). Building a pathway of optimal support for English language learners in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34(1), 59–70. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888406410380423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, L. W. (2008). Teaching bilingual students with special needs: A teacher training issue. Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(2), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mcdaniel, K.M. (2017). Beyond Compliance. In: Ellis, A.L. (eds) Transitioning Children with Disabilities. Studies in Inclusive Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-134-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-134-6_4

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-134-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics