Using the Taxonomy for Transition Programming 2.0 to Guide Transition Education

  • Paula Kohler
  • June Gothberg
  • Jennifer Coyle
Part of the Studies in Inclusive Education book series (STUIE)


It’s been two decades since Kohler’s seminal work was conducted to link transition research to everyday practices. Her Taxonomy for Transition Programming has provided the framework to delivering scientifically-based education and services for transition-age youth with disabilities across the United States and countries around the world (Kohler, 1996).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. DePaoli, J. L., Horning Fox, J., Ingram, E. S., Maushard, M., Bridgeland, J. M., & Balfanz, R. (2015). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises, the Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Education, America’s Promise Alliance, and the Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
  2. Finn, J. E., & Kohler, P. D. (2009, May). A compliance evaluation of the transition outcomes project. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research.Google Scholar
  4. Gamache, P., Westerland, D., Granucci, E. A., & Clark, H. B. (2006). Effects of peer mentors on work-related performance of adolescents with behavioral and/or learning disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halpern, A. S. (1985). Transition: A look at the foundations. Exceptional Children, 5, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halpern, E. S. (1993). Auditing natural inquiries: Some preliminary applications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Hardman, M., Drew, C., & Winston-Egan, M. (2002). Employment preparation. In M. Hardman, C. Drew, & M. Winston-Egan (Eds.), Human exceptionality: Society, school, and family (pp. 141–165). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Hasazi, S. B., Gordon, L. R., & Roe, C. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 61, 472–487.Google Scholar
  9. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, PL 101–476, 20 U.S.C. §; 1400-1485 (1990).Google Scholar
  10. Individuals with Disabilities Act Amendments of 1997, PL 105–17, 20 U.S.C. §; 1400 et seq. (1997).Google Scholar
  11. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. PL 108–446, 20 U.S.C. §; 1400 et seq. (2004).Google Scholar
  12. Kena, G., Hussar, W., McFarland, J., de Brey, C., Musu-Gillette, L., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Wilkinson, F. S., Diliberti, M., Barmer, A., Bullock, M. F., & Dunlop, V. E. (2016). The condition of education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Kohler, P. D. (1993). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 16, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohler, P. D. (1996). Taxonomy for transition programming: Linking research and practice. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  15. Kohler, P. D., & Fields, S. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. Journal of Special Education, 37, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohler, P., & Greene, G. (2004). Strategies for integrating transition-related competencies into teacher education. The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 27(2), 146–162.Google Scholar
  17. Kohler, P. D., & Rusch, F. R. (1995). School to work transition: Identification of employment related outcome and activity indicators. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kohler, P. D., DeStefano, L., Wermuth, T. R., Grayson, T. E., & McGinty, S. (1994). An analysis of exemplary transition programs: How and why are they selected? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kohler, P. D., Gothberg, J. E., Fowler, C., & Coyle, J. (2016). Taxonomy for transition programming 2.0: A model for planning, organizing, and evaluating transition education, services, and programs. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University. Retrieved from www.transitionta.orgGoogle Scholar
  20. Kortering, A., & Edgar, E. (1988). Vocational rehabilitation and special education: A need for cooperation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 178–184.Google Scholar
  21. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016, October 11). Retrieved from
  22. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Cameto, R., Knokey, A. M., & Shaver, D. (2010). Comparisons across time of the outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study (NLTS) and the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2010–3008). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  23. Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., Wei, X., Cameto, R., Contreras, E., Ferguson, K., Greene, S., & Schwarting, M. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  24. Oertle, K. M., & Seader, K. J. (2015). Research and practical considerations for rehabilitation transition collaboration. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 81(2), 3–18.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, M. T., & Heron, T. E. (1993). When the best is not good enough: An examination of best practice. The Journal of Special Education, 26, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rouleau, M. T. (2012). Transition planning: Best practices to increase post-secondary success in adolescents with disabilities (Masters Thesis). Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI.Google Scholar
  27. Rusch, F. R., Kohler, P. D., & Hughes, C. (1992). An analysis of OSERS-sponsored secondary special education and transitional services research. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 15, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Test, D. W., Aspel, N. P., & Everson, J. M. (2006). Transition methods for youth with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H., Richter, S. M., White, J., Mazzotti, V., Walker, A. R., Kohler, P., & Kortering, L. (2009, August). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. Retrieved from Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Education. (2015, December 15). U.S. high school graduation rate hits new record high: Achievement gap continues to narrow for underserved students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from
  31. Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005). After high school: A first look at the post-school experiences of youth with disabilities: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  32. Wehman, P., Kregel, J., & Barcus, J. M. (1985). From school to work: A vocational transition model for handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 52, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wehman, P., Kregel, J., & Seyfarth, J. (1985). Transition from school to work for individuals with severe handicaps: A follow-up study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 132–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Will, M. (1984). OSERS programming for the transition of youth with disabilities: Bridges from school to working life. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Office of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Williams-Bost, L., & Riccomini, P. J. (2006). Effective instruction: An inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paula Kohler
    • 1
  • June Gothberg
    • 2
  • Jennifer Coyle
    • 3
  1. 1.Florida Center for Students with Unique AbilitiesUniversity of Central FloridaUSA
  2. 2.Office of the Vice President for ResearchWestern Michigan UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Office of the Vice President for ResearchWestern Michigan UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations