Skip to main content

Groups and Boundaries in Higher Education

Partnership in Curriculum Development

  • Chapter
Collaboration, Communities and Competition
  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that co-operation between teachers, students and other groups is important for quality in education. According to Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG, 2015), quality in higher education (HE) is basically a result of interaction between teachers, students and the institutional learning environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barth, F. (Ed). (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2003). Participant objectivation. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(2), 281–294. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.00150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspersen, J., & Frølich, N. (2017). Higher education learning outcomes – Transforming higher education? European Journal of Education, 52(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degn, L. (2013). Making sense of management: A study of department head’s sensemaking processes in a changing environment. In J. E. Karlsen & R. O. M. Pritchard (Eds.), Resilient universities. Confronting changes in a challenging world (pp. 191–212). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, R. (1984). Rhetoric in sociology. London: McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Egeland, C., & Bergene, A. C. (2012). Tidsbruk, arbeidstid og tidskonflikt i den norske universitets- og høgskolesektoren [Work time and conflict of time use in Norwegian HEIs]. Oslo: AFI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ESG. (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area (ESG). Approved by the Ministerial Conference, May 2015. Retrieved from https://revisionesg.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/revised_esg_2015_adopted.pdf

  • Fanghanel, J. (2012). Being an academic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. (2000). Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 853–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gard, E., & Wadel, C. C. (2012). «Det er ikkje dansen i seg sjøl som er problemet, men alt han føre med seg.» Diskusjon av undervisning i lys av kvalifikasjonsrammeverket [“It’s not just the dance”. Discussions on education in view of the NQF]. In T. L. Hoel, B. Hanssen, & D. Husebø (Eds.). Utdanningskvalitet og undervisningskvalitet under press? Spenninger i høyere utdanning [Education quality and teaching quality under pressure]. Trondheim: Tapir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handal, G. (2015). Kritiske venner [Critical friends]. In H. I. Strømsø, K. Hofgaard Lycke, & P. Lauvås (Eds.), Når læring er det viktigste [When teaching is the most important]. Oslo: Cappelen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen, B., Husebø, D. & Moen, V. (2012). Å forelese er en ensom affære [Teaching is a lonely affair]. In T. L. Hoel, B. Hanssen, & D. Husebø (Eds.). Utdanningskvalitet og undervisningskvalitet under press? Spenninger i høyere utdanning [Education quality and teaching quality under pressure]. Trondheim: Tapir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2007). Writing and using learning outcomes. A practical guide. Cork: University College Cork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meld. St. (2016–2017). (2017). Kultur for kvalitet i høyere utdanning [Culture for quality in higher education]. White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/aee30e4b7d3241d5bd89db69fe38f7ba/no/pdfs/stm201620170016000dddpdfs.pdf

  • Ministry of Education. (2015). Høringforslag til revidert forskrift for kvalitetssikting av høyere utdanning og fagskoleutdanning [Proposal for revised regulations for quality assurance in higher education]. Oslo: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/6d1c42c3b00344f0a57ce006191a56d0/horingsnotat-forslag-til-endringer-i-forskrift-omkvalitetssikring-og-kvalitetsutvikling-i-hoyere-utdanning-og-fagskoleutdanning.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Mørk, B.E., Hoholm, T., Ellingsen, G., Edwin, B., & Aanestad, M. (2010). Challenging expertise: On power relations within and across communities of practice in medical innovation. Management Learning, 41, 575. doi:10.1177/1350507610374552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOKUT. (2016). Høring – forslag til ny forskrift om tilsyn med utdanningskvaliteten i høyere utdanning [Proposal for new regulations for regulations for quality in studies in higher education]. Oslo: NOKUT. Retrieved from http://www.nokut.no/Documents/NOKUT/Artikkelbibliotek/Norsk_utdanning/H%C3%B8ringer/H%C3%B8ringsbrev_forslag_til_ny_studietilsynsforskrift.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • NTNU & The Arctic University of Norway. (2016). Innsats for kvalitet [Efforts for quality]. Trondheim/Tromsø: NTNU & The Arctic University of Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • NQF. (2011). The Norwegian qualifications framework for life long learning. Retrieved from http://www.nokut.no/Documents/NOKUT/Artikkelbibliotek/Norsk_utdanning/NKR/20140606_Norwegian_Qualifications_Framework.pdf

  • Pettersen, R. C. (2005). Kvalitetslæring i høgere utdanning. Innføring i problem- og praksisbasert didaktikk [Quality learning in higher education: Introduction to problem based didactics]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, D. (2009). Book reviews “Communities of practice: Critical perspectives”, by Jason Hughes, Nick Jewson and Lorna Unwin (Eds.), Abingdon and New York, Routledge, 2007. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 199–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prøitz, T. S. (2015). Læringsutbytte [Learning outcome]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19, 1907–1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørskår, A. K. (2015). Kartlegging av læringsutbyttebeskrivelser. Sluttrapport [Survey of learning outcomes descriptions. End report]. Oslo: NOKUT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practice in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UHR. (2015). National guidelines for basic pedagogical competencies for teaching in higher education.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Bergen. (2016). Etablering av meriteringsordning: Excellent Teaching Practitioner (ETP). Paper for the board of the Faculty of mathematics and natural science. Bergen: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Stavanger. (2016). Revisjon av kvalitetssystemet ved Universitetet i Stavanger [Revision of the quality system at the University of Stavanger]. Paper for the board of the University of Stavanger, US 60/16. Stavanger: University of Stavanger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadel, C. C., & Gard, E. (2016). Ny i undervisning i høyere utdanning – Hvordan universitetslærere har erfart å bli tatt imot og fulgt opp som nyansatte [New in teaching in higher education – How university teachers have experienced reception and follow up as new employees]. Uniped, 3. Retrieved from https://www.idunn.no/uniped/2016/03/ny_i_undervisning_i_hoeyere_utdanning_-_hvordan_universitets

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2008). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gard, E.J., Wadel, C.C. (2017). Groups and Boundaries in Higher Education. In: Dent, S., Lane, L., Strike, T. (eds) Collaboration, Communities and Competition. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-122-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-122-3_7

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-122-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics