Co-Creating Meaning Through Artful Inquiry

  • Lotte Darsø
Part of the Creative Education Book Series book series (CREA)


The purpose of this chapter is to point out the need for aesthetic and artful methods for reflection, learning and co-creation. The context is management education focused on developing innovation competency. The main arguments are that Artful Inquiry affords deeper layers of knowing which would otherwise remain tacit and non-conscious.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aakjær, M. K. (2013). Reconfiguring boundaries in social innovation. Aarhus, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, N. J. (2007). Organizational metaphysics. Global wisdom and the audacity of hope. In E. H. Kessler & J. R. Bailey (Eds.), Handbook of organizational and managerial wisdom (pp. 423–458). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, N. J. (2016, January 13). Want to be an outstanding leader? Keep a journal. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, P. B. (1995). Art is a way of knowing: A guide to self-knowledge and spiritual fulfillment through creativity. Boston, MA & London: Shambala.Google Scholar
  5. Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better Society. Bristol, GB: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boland, R., & Collopy, F. (Eds.). (2004). Managing as designing. San Francisco, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The world café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kohler Publishcers, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Capacchione, L. (1991). Recovery of your inner child: The highly acclaimed method for liberating your inner self. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (1999). Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Kohler Communications, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunliffe, A. L., & Jun, J. S. (2005). The need for reflexivity in public administration. Adminstration & Society, 37(2), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. San Diego, CA & London: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Darsø, L. (2001). Innovation in the making. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  14. Darsø, L. (2003). [Is there a Formula for Innovation?]. Børsen Ledelseshåndbøger: Innovations- og Forandringsledelse.Google Scholar
  15. Darsø, L. (2004). Artful creation: Learning-tales of arts-in-business. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  16. Darsø, L. (2011). Innovationspædagogik: Kunsten at fremelske innovationskompetence. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  17. Darsø, L. (2012). Innovation competency – an essential organizational asset. In S. Høyrup, C. Hasse, M. Bonnafous-Boucher, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation (pp. 108–126). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darsø, L. (2014). Setting the context for transformation towards authentic leadership and co-creation. In O. Gunnlaugson, C. Baron, & M. Cayer (Eds.), Perspectives on theory U: Insights from the Field (pp. 97–113). Hershey, PA: IGI Clobal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Darsø, L. (2016). Artful inquiry as a leadership skill. Paper presented at the The 8th Conference of Art of Management and Organization, IEDC, Bled, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  20. Drucker, P. F. (1999, January). Managing oneself. Harvard Business Review, Best of HBR 1999, 100–109.Google Scholar
  21. Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative inquiry: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Friis, S. A. K. (2016). The 6C model: The contribution of design to open, complex, problem solving. The International Journal of Design in Society, 10(3), 13–30.Google Scholar
  23. Irgens, E. J. (2014). Art, science and the challenge of management education. Scandinavian journal of Management.Google Scholar
  24. Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part II Design and Culture, 4(2), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kunze, K. (2011). Development of human causality: LAICS Master in Leadership and Innovation in Complex Systems. Copenhagen: University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
  26. Mintzberg, H. (2009). Managing. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  27. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Palus, C. J., & Horth, D. M. (2002). The leader’s edge: Six creative competencies for navigating complex challenges. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Pink, D. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York, NY: Riverhead Books, The Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  30. Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith Publisher Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges: The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: SOL Press.Google Scholar
  32. Schrage, M. (2000). Serious play. How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schumann, K. (2009). Communicate to innovate – Facilitating innovative processes in complex systems: sLAICS master in leadership and innovation in complex systems. Copenhagen: University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
  34. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sköldberg, U. J., Woodilla, J., & Berthoin Antal, A. (2016). Artistic interventions in organizations: Research, theory and practice (Vol. 4). London & New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  36. Strati, A. (2000). The aesthetic approach in organization studies. In S. Linstead & H. Höpfl (Eds.), The aesthetics of organization (pp. 13–34). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Sutherland, I. (2013). Arts-based methods in leadership development: Affording aesthetic workspaces, reflexivity and memories with momentum. Management Learning, 1–19. doi:100.1177/1350507612465063Google Scholar
  38. Vogt, E. E., Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2003). The art of powerful questions: Catalyzing insight, innovation, and action. Mill Valley, CA: Whole Systems Associates.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, F. (2012). Take two hours of pine forest and call me in the morning. Ourside Magazine. Retrieved from sss website

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lotte Darsø
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Learning, School of EducationAarhus UniversityDenmark

Personalised recommendations