Theatre as Co-Creative Space and as Inspiration for Higher Education

  • Tatiana Chemi
  • Pierangelo Pompa
Part of the Creative Education Book Series book series (CREA)


The director stands up on the left corner of the stage, facing the audience that is sitting in a semi-circle. The actors sit on chairs facing the audience, still sweating and catching their breath after a physically demanding performance. They are having a conversation with a group of scholars. Together we are trying to enquire into the concept of co-creation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barba, E. (1995). The paper canoe. London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barba, E. (2015). The moon rises from the ganges: My journey through Asian acting techniques. Holstebro & Malta: Icarus Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barba, E., & Savarese, N. (2011). A dictionary of theatre anthropology: The secret art of the performer. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. (1990). The idea of higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beach, K. (1999). Chapter 4: Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of research in education, 24(1), 101–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bråten, S. (Ed.). (2007). On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy. Amsterdam, NLD: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Chemi, T. (2016a). Distributed problem-solving: How artists’ participatory strategies can inspire creativity in higher education. In C. Zhou (Ed.), Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Chemi, T. (2016b, July 7–9). Transgressive or instrumental? A paradigm for the arts as learning and development. Full paper at 32nd EGOS colloquium, organizing in the shadow of power. Naples, Italy: University of Naples Federico II.Google Scholar
  9. Chemi, T., Jensen, J. B., & Hersted, L. (2015). Behind the scenes of artistic creativity: Processes of learning, creating and organising. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christoffersen, E. E. (2004). Introduction to peripeti and serendipity. Peripeti, 2, 5–15.Google Scholar
  11. Darsø, L. (2004), Artful creation: Learning-tales of arts-in-business. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  12. Decroux, E. (1963). Paroles sur le mime. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. London: Perigee (I 1934).Google Scholar
  14. Dissanayake, E. (1995). Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle, WA & London: University of Washington Press (I 1992).Google Scholar
  15. Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the art began. Seattle, WA & London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freud, S. (2003). Beyond the pleasure principle (Vol. 840). Penguin UK.Google Scholar
  18. Gosse, V., & Moser, R. (Eds.). (2004). World the sixties made: Politics and culture in recent America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hanke, M. (1990). Socratic pragmatics: Maieutic dialogues. Journal of pragmatics, 14(3), 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickman, L. A. (2007). Pragmatism as post-postmodernism: Lessons from John Dewey. Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Illeris, K. (2009). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theoristsin their own words. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford & New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lorenz, E. (1972). Predictability: Does the flap of a butterfly’s wing in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? American Association for the Advancement of Science, December 29, 1972.Google Scholar
  24. Marwick, A. (1994). Experimental theatre in the 1960s. History Today, 44(10), 34.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer-Dinkgräfe, D. (2005). Theatre and consciousness: Explanatory scope and future potential. Bristol, GB: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  26. Radbourne, J., Glow, H., & Johanson, K. (2014). Audience experience: A critical analysis of audiences in the performing arts. Bristol, GB: Intellect.Google Scholar
  27. Sawyer, K. (2007). Group genius: The power of creative collaboration. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Scharmer, C. O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Schechner, R. (2002). Performance studies: An introduction. London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Schino, M. (2009). Alchemists of the stage: Theatre laboratories in Europe. Poland: Icarus.Google Scholar
  31. Stanislavski, C. (1989). An actor prepares. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  32. Turner, V. W. (1982). From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play. Paj Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Van den Hout, J. J., Davies, C., & Walgrave, B. (2016). The application of team flow theory. In L. Harmat, F. Ørsted Andersen, F. Ullén, J. Wright, & G. Sadlo (Eds.), Flow experience: Empirical research and applications. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Chemi
    • 1
  • Pierangelo Pompa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.Altamira Studio TeaterDenmark

Personalised recommendations