Facilitating Reflective Learning and Co-Creative Teaching by Portfolios in Problem-Based Learning (PBL)

  • Chunfang Zhou
  • Ole Ravn
  • Xiangyun Du
Part of the Creative Education Book Series book series (CREA)


Propelled by advances in global communication and information technologies, the nature of interactions among individuals and their environments has been changing rapidly, driving an ongoing metamorphosis of value creation in business, economy, and society. Individuals are attempting to push through previously impervious institutional boundaries to express their various demands and expectations and they are active stakeholders, who want to be more intensively engaged in value creation than ever before.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Artze, A. F., Armour-Thomas, E., Curcio, F. R., & Gurl, T. J. (2007). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: A guide for observations and self-assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problem-based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35, 884–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ghaye, T. (2010). Teaching and learning through reflective practice: A practical guide for positive action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Gordon, J. (2003). Assessing students’ personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Medical Education, 37, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Illeris, K. (2007). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Klwnowski, V. (2004). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Kolb, D., & Fry, R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group practices. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Lonka, K., Slotte, V., Halttunen, M., Kurki, T., Tiitinen, A., Vaara, L., & Paavonen, J. (2001). Portfolios as a learning tool in obstetrics and gynaecology undergraduate training. Medical Education, 35, 1125–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Michelson, E., & Mandell, A. (2004). Portfolio development and the assessment of prior learning: Perspectives, models, and practices. Virginia, VA: Sterling.Google Scholar
  12. Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ng, C. K. C. (2010). Portfolios: An affordable and effective means to pursue lifelong learning. In P. C. Margaret (Ed.), Handbook of lifelong learning developments (pp. 347–360). USA: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Pitts, J. (2010). Portfolios, personal development and reflective practice. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice (pp. 99–110). London: Willey- Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poikela, S., Vuoskoski, P., & Kärnä, M. (2009). Developing creative learning environments. In O. S. Tan (Ed.), Problem-based learning and creativity (pp. 67–85). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pvt Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Porath, M., & Jordan, E. (2009). Problem-based learning communities: Using the social environment to support creativity. In O. S. Tan (Ed.), Problem-based learning and creativity (pp. 51–66). Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pvt Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The co-creation paradigm. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Splid, C. M., & Qvist, P. (2013). The aalborg model and management by objectives and resources: A theoretical frame. In L. Krogh & A. A. Jensen (Eds.), Visions, challenges, and strategies: PBL principles and methodologies in a danish and global perspectives (pp. 87–102). Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Weber, M. (1922). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. In. M. Weber (Ed.), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (Vol. 1, pp. 17–206). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  20. Weddle, D. O., Himburg, S. P., Collins, N., & Lewis, R. (2002). The professional development portfolio process: Setting goals for credentialing. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(10), 1439–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhou, C., Otrel-Cass, K., & Børsen, T. (2015). Integrating ethics into engineering education. In S. S. Sethy (Ed.), Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 159–173). USA: IGI global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunfang Zhou
    • 1
  • Ole Ravn
    • 2
  • Xiangyun Du
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Learning and Philosophy, and Department of PlanningAalborg UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityDenmark

Personalised recommendations