Advertisement

Co-Creating Knowledge

Students and Teachers together in a Field of Emergence
  • Ann-Merete Iversen
  • Anni Stavnskær Pedersen
Chapter
  • 481 Downloads
Part of the Creative Education Book Series book series (CREA)

Abstract

The modern school, at its best, is a satisfying extension of the unreality of societal perception. As we enter the conclusion of an industrializing age, I recognize that, within its walls, lectures are concerned with an abstract dream of future usefulness, while life is happening between classes. Half of the time, and half asleep, teachers and students keep each other caught in a fiction of relevance: Relevance of knowledge to our lives, relevance of the relationships to each other, and relevance to the questions of our time and to the society in which we live.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, N. J., & Hansen, H. (2012). Daring to care: Scholarship that supports of our convictions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(2), 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. (2002). How to kill creativity. The Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76–87. Harvard Business School Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Northvale, NJ: Chandler Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Belling, L. (2010). Fortællinger fra U’et: Dansk psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  6. Bens, I. (2006). Facilitating to lead!: Leadership strategies for a networked world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Besselink, T. (2014). Learning choreography. In J. W. Moravec (Ed.), Knowmad society. San Bernardino, CA: Education Futures.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities- of- practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The world cafe: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Darsø, L. (2004). Artful creation: Learning-tales of arts-in business. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  11. Darsø, L. (2011). Innovationspædagogik: Kunsten at fremelske innovationskompetence. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  12. Degnegaard, R. (2014). Co-creation, prevailing streams and future design trajectories. CoDesign, 10(2), 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drucker, P. (1999). Managing oneself. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1–60.Google Scholar
  14. Ghais, S. (2005). Extreme facilitation: Guiding groups through controversy and complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Hassan, Z. (2014). The social labs revolution: A new approach to solving our most complex challenges.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Iversen, A., Stavnskær, A., Krogh, L., & Aarup Jensen, A. (2015). Learning, leading and letting go of control: Learner-led approaches in education. Sage Open, 5(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahane, A. (2012). Transformative scenario planning: Working together to change the future. San Francisco, CA. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Madsen, J. (2016, May 6). Jeg lærte mere af en måned på højskole end to år på universitetet. Politiken. Retrieved from: http://politiken.dk/debat/art5637856/Jeg-l%C3%A6rte-mere-af-en-m%C3%A5nedp%C3%A5-h%C3%B8jskole-end-af-to-%C3%A5r-p%C3%A5-universitetetGoogle Scholar
  20. McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and continuing Education, 74, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moravec, J. W. (2008). Towards society 3.0: A new paradigm for 21st century education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  23. Moravec, J. W. (Ed.). (2014). Knowmad society. San Bernardino, CA: Education Futures.Google Scholar
  24. Mowles, C., Stacey, R., & Griffin, D. (2008). What contribution can insights from the complexity sciences make to the theory and practice of development management? Journal of International Development, 20(6), 804–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ravn, I. (2007). The learning conferences. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(3), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers, C. (1983) Freedom to learn. Oledo: Bell & Howell Company.Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, E. B., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scharmer, O. C. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges: The social technology of presencing. Published for SOL (The Society for Organizational Learning), San Francisco,CA & London: Berrett-Koehler McGraw-Hill distributor.Google Scholar
  29. Scharmer, O. C., & Käufer, K. (2000). Universities as the birthplace for the entrepreneuring human beings: MIT sloan school of management. Retrieved from http://www.ottoscharmer.com/sites/default/files/2000_Uni21us.pdfGoogle Scholar
  30. Scharmer, O. C., & Kaüfer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to eco-system economies. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, P. (2002). Changing conversations in organizations: A complexity approach to change. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shaw, P. (2005). Conversational inquiry as an approach to organisation development. Journal of Innovative Management, 19–22. Retrieved from http://www.dacapo.as/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Pshaw_Conversational_Inquiry_as_an_Approach_to_Organisation_Development21.pdf
  33. Stacey, R. D. (2003). Learning as an activity of interdependent people. The learning organization, 10(6), 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stacey, R. D. (2007). Strategic management and organisational dynamics: The challenge of complexity to ways of thinking about organisations. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  35. Stavnskær, A. (2014). Human (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Laics Master, CBS (Copenhagen Business School), Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, T. A., & Purdy, J. M. (2009). When a good idea isn’t enough: Curricular innovation as a political process. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(2), 188–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann-Merete Iversen
    • 1
  • Anni Stavnskær Pedersen
    • 2
  1. 1.University College NordjyllandDenmark
  2. 2.University College NordjyllandDenmark

Personalised recommendations