Skip to main content

Designing Learning for Co-Creation

Conceptual and Practical Considerations

  • Chapter
  • 744 Accesses

Part of the book series: Creative Education Book Series ((CREA))

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the practical implications of the concept of co-creation in a professional context from an educational point of view. The question we are posing ourselves is: how can higher and further education (HE) educate for co-creation, that is, provide educational frameworks that respond to the societal demand for co-creation, particularly within the public welfare sector? More specifically, we focus on which organisational and individual requirements a HE learning design should take into account in order to support the diffusion of co-creation competences within the public welfare sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allentoft, N., & Pedersen O. K. (2015, December 21). Velfærdsdebatten er løbet af sporet, Den offentlige.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. K., & Reiermann, J. (2016, February). Sammen skal vi gentænke velfærden, Mandag Morgen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen Åkerstrøm, N. (2012). To promise a promise: When contractors desire a life-long partnership. In N. Andersen Åkerstrøm & I. –J. Sand (Eds.), Hybrid forms of governance: Self-suspension of power.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen Åkerstrøm, N., & Pors Grønbæk, J. (2014). Playful membership: Embracing an unknown future. Management & Organizational History, 9(2), 166–183. doi:10.1080/17449359.2014.891796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen Åkerstrøm, N., & Pors Grønbæk, J. (2014). Velfærdsledelse: Mellem styring & potentialitet. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (2000). Organisatorisk læring – single- & double-loop. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Tekster om læring. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitets forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for at better society. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity, community, culture and difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence and Wishard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borum, F. (2013). Strategier for organisationsforandringer. København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). Hvad er filosofi. København: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2005). Demokrati & uddannelse. Århus: Klim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2009). Hvordan vi tænker. Århus: Klim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elstrøm, P. E. (2002). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), Winther 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbersen Hygum, H., & Ibsen, I. (2016). Kommunernes samarbejde med civile aktører – forskelle & ligheder i forventninger, praksis, samarbejdspartnere & oplevet udbytte. KORA Det Nationale institut for Kommuners & Regioners Analyse & Forskning, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. m.fl. Spredning af offentlig innovation: Hvad kan vi lære af forskningen? Center for offentlig innovation, COI, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hulgård, E. (2016). Socialt entreprenørskab, innovation & samskabelse. In E. Hulgård, E. Nielsen, & M. Juul-Olsen (Eds.), Samskabelse & socialt entreprenørskab – en casebaseret grundbog til professionsuddannelserne. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausen, K. K. (2001). Skulle det være noget særligt. København: Børsens Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerborg, L. (2011). Styringsparadigmer i den offentlige sektor. København: Jurist- & Økonom forbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1973). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Great Britain: Pitman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majgaard, K. (2013). Offentlig styring – simpel, reflekteret & transformativ. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, H. G. (1934/2005). Sindet, selvet & samfundet. København: Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen Aagaard, K. (2014). Aktionsforskningens videnskabsteori: Forskning som forandring. In L. Fuglsang, P. Bitch Olsen, & K. Rasborg (Eds.), Videnskabsteori i samfundsvidenskaberne – påtværs af fagkulturer & paradigmer. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., & Nielsen, B. (2015). Aktionsforskning. In S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing 18(2), summer 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, L. (2004). Det lærende samfund: Hyperkompleksitet & viden. København: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runya, X. U., Qigui, S., & Wei, S. (2015). The third wave of public administration: The new public governance. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røvik, K. A. (2007/2014). Trender & translasjoner: Ideer som former det 21: Århundrets organisasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2011). Samarbejdsdreven innovation – i den offentlige sektor. København: Jurist- & Økonomiforbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyssen, O. (1997). Værdiledelse – om organisationer & etik. København: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitter, I., & Hoeve, A. (2012), Hybrid learning environments: Merging learning and work processes to facilitate knowledge integration and transitions. OECD Education Working Papers (81). OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gnaur, D., Larsen-Nielsen, I.M. (2017). Designing Learning for Co-Creation. In: Chemi, T., Krogh, L. (eds) Co-Creation in Higher Education. Creative Education Book Series. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-119-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-119-3_13

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-119-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics