Advertisement

Designing Learning for Co-Creation

Conceptual and Practical Considerations
  • Dorina Gnaur
  • Inger Marie Larsen-Nielsen
Chapter
  • 463 Downloads
Part of the Creative Education Book Series book series (CREA)

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the practical implications of the concept of co-creation in a professional context from an educational point of view. The question we are posing ourselves is: how can higher and further education (HE) educate for co-creation, that is, provide educational frameworks that respond to the societal demand for co-creation, particularly within the public welfare sector? More specifically, we focus on which organisational and individual requirements a HE learning design should take into account in order to support the diffusion of co-creation competences within the public welfare sector.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allentoft, N., & Pedersen O. K. (2015, December 21). Velfærdsdebatten er løbet af sporet, Den offentlige.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, T. K., & Reiermann, J. (2016, February). Sammen skal vi gentænke velfærden, Mandag Morgen.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen Åkerstrøm, N. (2012). To promise a promise: When contractors desire a life-long partnership. In N. Andersen Åkerstrøm & I. –J. Sand (Eds.), Hybrid forms of governance: Self-suspension of power.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen Åkerstrøm, N., & Pors Grønbæk, J. (2014). Playful membership: Embracing an unknown future. Management & Organizational History, 9(2), 166–183. doi: 10.1080/17449359.2014.891796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen Åkerstrøm, N., & Pors Grønbæk, J. (2014). Velfærdsledelse: Mellem styring & potentialitet. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.Google Scholar
  6. Argyris, C. (2000). Organisatorisk læring – single- & double-loop. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Tekster om læring. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitets forlag.Google Scholar
  7. Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for at better society. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity, community, culture and difference (pp. 207–221). London: Lawrence and Wishard.Google Scholar
  9. Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borum, F. (2013). Strategier for organisationsforandringer. København: Handelshøjskolens Forlag.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). Hvad er filosofi. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (2005). Demokrati & uddannelse. Århus: Klim.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (2009). Hvordan vi tænker. Århus: Klim.Google Scholar
  14. Elstrøm, P. E. (2002). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), Winther 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Esbersen Hygum, H., & Ibsen, I. (2016). Kommunernes samarbejde med civile aktører – forskelle & ligheder i forventninger, praksis, samarbejdspartnere & oplevet udbytte. KORA Det Nationale institut for Kommuners & Regioners Analyse & Forskning, 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, D. m.fl. Spredning af offentlig innovation: Hvad kan vi lære af forskningen? Center for offentlig innovation, COI, 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hulgård, E. (2016). Socialt entreprenørskab, innovation & samskabelse. In E. Hulgård, E. Nielsen, & M. Juul-Olsen (Eds.), Samskabelse & socialt entreprenørskab – en casebaseret grundbog til professionsuddannelserne. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  19. Klausen, K. K. (2001). Skulle det være noget særligt. København: Børsens Forlag.Google Scholar
  20. Lerborg, L. (2011). Styringsparadigmer i den offentlige sektor. København: Jurist- & Økonom forbundets Forlag.Google Scholar
  21. Luhmann, N. (1973). Trust and power: Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Great Britain: Pitman Press.Google Scholar
  22. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Majgaard, K. (2013). Offentlig styring – simpel, reflekteret & transformativ. København: Hans Reitzels forlag.Google Scholar
  24. Mead, H. G. (1934/2005). Sindet, selvet & samfundet. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  25. Nielsen Aagaard, K. (2014). Aktionsforskningens videnskabsteori: Forskning som forandring. In L. Fuglsang, P. Bitch Olsen, & K. Rasborg (Eds.), Videnskabsteori i samfundsvidenskaberne – påtværs af fagkulturer & paradigmer. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  26. Nielsen, K., & Nielsen, B. (2015). Aktionsforskning. In S. Brinkmann & L. Tanggaard (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder: En grundbog. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  27. Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing 18(2), summer 2004.Google Scholar
  29. Qvortrup, L. (2004). Det lærende samfund: Hyperkompleksitet & viden. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  30. Roger, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Runya, X. U., Qigui, S., & Wei, S. (2015). The third wave of public administration: The new public governance. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 11–21.Google Scholar
  32. Røvik, K. A. (2007/2014). Trender & translasjoner: Ideer som former det 21: Århundrets organisasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  33. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2011). Samarbejdsdreven innovation – i den offentlige sektor. København: Jurist- & Økonomiforbundets Forlag.Google Scholar
  34. Stacey, R. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Thyssen, O. (1997). Værdiledelse – om organisationer & etik. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  36. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Zitter, I., & Hoeve, A. (2012), Hybrid learning environments: Merging learning and work processes to facilitate knowledge integration and transitions. OECD Education Working Papers (81). OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorina Gnaur
    • 1
  • Inger Marie Larsen-Nielsen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityDenmark
  2. 2.School of Further and Continuous EducationVIA University CollegeDenmark

Personalised recommendations