Skip to main content

The Transcultural Discourse of Affect in Philosophical Inquiry

An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 460 Accesses

Abstract

I came to the United States for the first time a little over ten years ago. I was 26 years old, had never lived outside of my country (Portugal) and, though I did speak English somewhat fluently, it was not my first language. Since the reason for my trip to the United States was to attend a Philosophy for Children seminar, I was almost immediately immersed in the practice, which ended up constituting my very first experience with the local cultural and linguistic context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Clough, P. (2008). (De) Coding the subject-in-affect. Subjectivity, 23(1), 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. O. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York, NY: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2013). Of grammatology. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, N. (2014). Body talk, body taunt – Corporeal dialogue within a community of philosophical inquiry. Analytical Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 35(1), 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, M. (2001). The perils of rationality: Nietzsche, peirce and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 33(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children. (n.d.). Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children (IAPC). Retrieved from Montclair State University Website: https://www.montclair.edu/cehs/academics/centers-and-institutes/iapc/

  • Kennedy, D. (2006). The well of being: Childhood, subjectivity, and education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. (2010). Philosophical dialogue with children: Essays on theory and practice. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D., & Vansieleghem, N. (2012). Philosophy for children in transition: Problems and prospects. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. (1981). Childhood: The recapitulation model. Thinking, 3–4(2), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, A. (2011). Aesthetics, affect, and educational politics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(10), 1088–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagia, D. (2009). The political life of sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires, M. (2014). Deterritorializing the child: Towards a theory of affect in educational philosophy and research. Montclair, NJ: Montclair State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2010). Semiotics education experience. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, A. (1997). The aesthetic dimension of the community of inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 17(1), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, B. (1930). Spinoza selections. New York, NY: The Scribner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2007). Philosophy: A school of freedom. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, K. (2006). From aesthetics to politics: Rancière, kant and deleuze. Contemporary Aesthetics, 4. Retrieved from http://www.contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=382

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pires, M. (2017). The Transcultural Discourse of Affect in Philosophical Inquiry. In: Lin, CC., Sequeira, L. (eds) Inclusion, Diversity, and Intercultural Dialogue in Young People’s Philosophical Inquiry. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-065-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-065-3_2

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-065-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics