Abstract
This chapter, using data from Session 3 of the intervention, focuses on the students’ initial reasoning when comparing fractions. The investigation begins with a context about sharing candy bars presented as a real-life dilemma by Researcher Carolyn Maher. The discussion posed the question of equity when sharing different-sized candy bars.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Davis, R. B. (1984). Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to mathematics education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Davis, R. B. (1990). Discovery learning and constructivism. In R. Davis, C. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (Chapter 7, pp. 93–106, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. Monograph No. 4). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kieren, T. E., & Pirie, S. E. (1991). Recursion and the mathematical experience. In I. P. Steffe (Ed.), Epistemological foundations of mathematical experience (pp. 78–101). New York, NY: Springer.
Lamon, S. J. (1996). The development of unitizing: Its role in children’s partitioning strategies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 170–193.
Ling, L. M., & Runesson, U. (2007). Teachers’ learning from learning studies: An example of teaching and learning fractions in primary four. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 157–161). Seoul, Korea: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994a). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? In P. Cobb (Ed.), Learning mathematics: Constructivist and interventionist theories of mathematical development (pp. 61–86). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994b). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 165–190.
Pirie, S., & Martin, L. (2003). The role of collecting in the growth of mathematical understanding. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(2), 127–146.
Steencken, E. (2001). Tracing the growth in understanding of fraction ideas: A fourth grade case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Steencken, E. P., & Maher, C. A. (2003). Tracing fourth graders’ learning of fractions: Early episodes from a year-long teaching experiment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(2), 113–132.
Yankelewitz, D. (2009). The development of mathematical reasoning in elementary school students’ exploration of fraction ideas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Yoshida, K. (2004, July 14–18). Understanding how the concept of fractions develops: A Vygotskian perspective (Vol. 4, pp. 473–480). Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ness, C.K.V., Alston, A.S. (2017). Establishing the Importance of the Unit. In: Maher, C.A., Yankelewitz, D. (eds) Children’s Reasoning While Building Fraction Ideas. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-008-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-008-0_7
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-008-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)