Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teaching and Learning ((MTAL))

  • 400 Accesses

Abstract

The 17 chapters in this volume have presented the integrated findings from examinations of one group of 4th grade students in a suburban/rural school district in New Jersey, as they explored ideas about fractions over a four-month period at the beginning of the academic year. Cuisenaire rods were the primary tools they used for building models to represent their emerging ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Using a translation model for curriculum development and classroom instruction. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2010). Promoting student reasoning through careful task design: A comparison of three studies. International Journal for Studies in Mathematics Education, 3(Transcript line 1), 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994a). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? In P. Cobb (Ed.), Learning mathematics: Constructivist and interventionist theories of mathematical development (pp. 61–86). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994b). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterize it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. (2011). Teaching mathematics: Using research informed strategies. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelewitz, D. (2009). The development of mathematical reasoning in elementary school students’ exploration of fraction ideas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelewitz, Y., Mueller, M., & Maher, C. A. (2010). A task that elicits reasoning: A dual analysis. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maher, C.A., Alston, A.S., Yankelewitz, D. (2017). Epilogue. In: Maher, C.A., Yankelewitz, D. (eds) Children’s Reasoning While Building Fraction Ideas. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-008-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-008-0_19

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-008-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics