Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teaching and Learning ((MTAL))

  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

This book describes episodes that are based on video data from an NSF funded classroom study of nine-year old children investigating fraction ideas under conditions that supported investigation, collaboration and argumentation. All of the sessions during the study were videotaped with two or three cameras and the video data, transcripts, and student work were analyzed and stored in an open-source Video Mosaic Repository, VMC (www.videomosaic.org). The chapters that follow are based on analyses of these video data and are accompanied by video narratives (VMCAnalytics), built with the VMC RUanalytic tool to support the descriptions of student reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alibert, D., & Thomas, M. (1991). Research on mathematical proof. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 215–230). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, A. S., Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1994). Children’s use of alternative structures. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 248–255). Lisboa, Portugal: University of Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils’ practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216–330). London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof. In L. I. Tatsien (Ed.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (Vol. III, pp. 907–920). Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgar, S. (2002). Through a teacher’s lens: Children’s constructions of division of fractions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlwanger, S. H. (1973). Benny’s conception of rules and answers in IPI mathematics. Journal of Children’s Mathematical Behavior, 1(2), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, K. (2016). Utilizing video analytics to examine the role of representations in problem solving across grade bands (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1996a). Young children invent methods of proof: The “Gang of Four”. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 431–444). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1996b). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 194–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, C. A., Martino, A., & Davis, R. B., (1994). Children’s different ways of thinking about fractions. In J. P. da Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 208–215). Lisboa, Portugal: University of Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (1988). Stimulating presentation of theorems followed by responsive proofs. For the Learning of Mathematics, 8(2), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning (Vols. 1 & 2). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recursion. In Wikipedia Encyclopedia. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recursion

  • Reynolds, S. L. (2005). A study of fourth-grade students’ explorations into comparing fractions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T. (2002a). Generic proofs in number theory. In S. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 157–184). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T. (2002b). Proofs in number theory: History and heresy (Vol. I, pp. 230–235). Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, University of Norwich, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeelk, S. (2010). An investigation of fourth grade students growing understanding of rational numbers (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1982). Problem-solving research and mathematical education. In F. K. Lester & J. Garofalo (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Issues in research (pp. 27–37). Philadelphia, PA: The Franklin Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2007). Overcoming students’ difficulties in learning how to understand and construct proofs (Report #2007-1). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518604.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., Eggen, M., & St. Andre, R. (2001). A transition to advanced mathematics (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steencken, E. (2001). Tracing the growth in understanding of fraction ideas: A fourth grade case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankelewitz, D. (2009). The development of mathematical reasoning in elementary school students’ exploration of fraction ideas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maher, C.A., Yankelewitz, D. (2017). The Experiment. In: Maher, C.A., Yankelewitz, D. (eds) Children’s Reasoning While Building Fraction Ideas. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-008-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-008-0_1

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-008-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics