Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Future-Oriented Reform of Craft Education

The Cases of Finland and Latvia

  • Chapter
Reforming Teaching and Teacher Education

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to describe craft education from three perspectives: current craft education, the challenges craft education will face in the future, and descriptions of two future-oriented pedagogical models with some examples that may reform craft education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahonen, S. (2003). Yhteinen koulu tasa-arvoa vai tasapäisyyttä? Koulutuksellinen tasa-arvo Suomessa Snellmanista tähän päivään [The common school as equality or uniformity. Educational equality in Finland from Snellman to this day]. Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Amanis, I. (1992, November 19). Par mājturības mācību priekšmeta problēmām [On the problems of handicraft and home economics subjects]. Izglītība, 43, p. 7. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. New York, NY: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anspaks, J. (2004). Mākslas pedagoģija: Mākslas pedagoģijas teorijas un prakses pamatu veidotāji [Art pedagogic. The theories of art pedagogic and the creators of the basis of practice] (Pt. 1). Riga, Latvia: RaKa. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anttila, P. (1993). Käsityön ja muotoilun teoreettiset perusteet [The theoretical basis of craft and craft design]. Helsinki, Finland: WSOY. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. A. (1926). History of Manual and Industrial Education up to 1870. Peoria, IL: The Manual Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. de Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwhistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). New York, NY: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2011). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey, P. (2000). “Theories of technology as extension of human faculties.” In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology Research in Philosophy and Technology (Vol.19, pp. 59–78). London, UK: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cīrulis, K. (1879a, October 24). Mājrūpniecības svars vispārīgi un it īpaši audzināšanas ziņā [The importance of home industry, particularly in education]. Baltijas Zemkopis, 43, pp. 339–341. (In Latvian) Cīrulis, K. (1879b, October 31). Mājrūpniecības svars vispārīgi un it īpaši audzināšanas ziņā [The importance of home industry, particularly in education]. Baltijas Zemkopis, 44, pp. 346–347. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cīrulis, K. (1887a, July 28). Rokdarbs kā vispārīgi attīstošs mācības priekšmets [Craft as the subject of general development]. Dienas Lapa, 168, pp. 1–2. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cīrulis, K. (1887b, July 29). Rokdarbs kā vispārīgi attīstošs mācības priekšmets [Craft as the subject of general development]. Dienas Lapa, 169, pp. 1–2. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cīrulis, K. (1887c, July 30). Rokdarbs kā vispārīgi attīstošs mācības priekšmets [Craft as the subject of general development]. Dienas Lapa, 170, pp. 1–2. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cygnaeus, U. (1910a). Ehdotuksia Suomen kansakoulutoimesta [Suggestions for Finnish elementary school action]. In G. Lönnbeck (Ed.), Uno Cygnaeuksen kirjoitukset Suomen kansakoulun perustamisesta ja järjestämisestä [Uno Cygnaeus’ writings on the establishment and organization of Finnish elementary school] (pp. 173–344). Helsinki, Finland: Kansanvalistusseura. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cygnaeus, U. (1910b). Vastine tarkastuskomitean lausuntoon ja ehdotuksiin [The reply to the opinion and proposals of auditing committee]. In G. Lönnbeck (Ed.), Uno Cygnaeuksen kirjoitukset Suomen kansakoulun perustamisesta ja järjestämisestä [Uno Cygnaeus’ writings on the establishment and organization of Finnish elementary school] (pp. 345–383). Helsinki, Finland: Kansanvalistusseura. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, C. M., Madeja, S. S., & Sabol, R. F. (2004). Assessing Expressive Learning: A practical guide for teacher-directed, authentic assessment in K–12 visual arts education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • eNorssi. (2014). Stealing. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.enorssi.fi/Stealing

  • Freeman, W., & Brett, C. (2012). Prompting authentic blogging practice in an online graduate course. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1032–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, E. (2002). Craft education in Finland: Definitions, rationales and the future. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 21(2), 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, E. (2014). Craft as activism. The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 33, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, B. (2014). Craftivism: The art of craft and activism. Vancouver, Canada: Arsenal Pulp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halila, A. (1949). Suomen kansakoululaitoksen historia III: Piirijakoasetuksesta oppivelvollisuuteen [The history of the Finnish elementary school III. From the enactment of the division into districts to compulsory education]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2012). Next Wave Cultures: Feminism, subcultures, activism. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasio, C. (2010). Veterans and an arts and crafts programme: A community of understanding and hope. International Journal of Education through Art, 6(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huotilainen, M. (2013, September 27). Käsityön pitäisi olla ihmisoikeus [Craft should be a human right]. V. Kotilainen (Rept.). [Yle News]. Finnish Broadcasting Company. Retrieved July 26, 2016, from http://yle.fi/uutiset/kasityon_pitaisi_olla_ihmisoikeus/6852988. (In Finnish)

  • Ihatsu, A.-M. (2002). Making Sense of Contemporary American Craft (Joensuun yliopiston kasvatustieteellisiä julkaisuja, No. 73). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihatsu, A.-M. (2006). Käsityö – uusiutuva luonnonvara [Craft – A renewable natural resource]. In L. Kaukinen & M. Collanus (Eds.), Tekstejä ja kangastuksia: Puheenvuoroja käsityöstä ja sen tulevaisuudesta [Texts and mirages. Conversations on craft and the future of craft] (pp. 19–30). Hamina, Finland: Akatiimi. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • IM MLN (Ministry of Education, Department of Teaching Materials). (1928). Latvijas tautskolu programmas [Subject syllabus for Latvian folk schools]. Riga, Latvia: Gulbis. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • IM MLN (Ministry of Education, Department of Teaching Materials). (1935). Latvijas pamatskolu programmas [Subject syllabus for Latvian elementary schools]. Riga, Latvia: IM mâcîbas lîdzekïu nodaïa. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, … Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, UK: Mit Press. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.dourish.com/classes/readings/HorstHerr-StephensonRobinson.pdf

  • Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Sale, K., … Watkins, S. G. (2013). Connected Learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, K. (2014). The Artifact Project: Promoting Design Learning in the Elementary Classroom (Home Economics and Craft Studies Research Reports, No. 35). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Design expert’s participation in elementary students’ collaborative design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen, S. (2008). Craft-art as a basis for human activity. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 7(1), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaukinen, L. (2006). Käsityöoppiaineen arvo ja merkitys sekä opettajankoulutuksen järjestäminen [The value and significance of craft as a school subject and the organization of teacher education]. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen (Ed.), Taide- ja taitoaineiden opetuksen merkityksiä (Teatterikorkeakoulun julkaisusarja, No. 39). Helsinki, Finland: Teatterikorkeakoulu. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • KH (National Board of General Education). (1985). Peruskoulun opetussuunnitelman perusteet 1985 [Framework curriculum for the comprehensive school]. Helsinki, Finland: Kouluhallitus. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinard, L. (2009). Art+Quilt: Design principles and creativity exercises. Loveland, CO: Interweave Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojonkoski-Rännäli, S. (1998). Ajatus käsissämme: Käsityön käsitteen merkityssisällön analyysi [The

    Google Scholar 

  • thought in our hands. An analysis of the meaning of the concept handicraft] (Research, Ser. A, No. 185). Turku, Finland: University of Turku. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojonkoski-Rännäli, S. (2006). Käsityön kaunis tulevaisuus [The beautiful future of craft]. In L. Kaukinen & M. Collanus (Eds.), Tekstejä ja kangastuksia: Puheenvuoroja käsityöstä ja sen tulevaisuudesta [Texts and mirages. Discussions on craft and the future of craft] (pp. 97–107). Hamina, Finland: Akatiimi. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotriakhov, N. (2006). The Effects of Otto Salomon’s System on the Dissemination of Pedagogical Manual Training in Russia in 1884–1917. Bulletin of Institute of Vocational and Technical Education, 3, 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, T. (2014). Textile cultural dialogue. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://ohje.punomo.fi/home/joensuu/textile_dialogue/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, T., & Urdziņa-Deruma, M. (2015). Intercultural dialogue by virtual co-design. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 22(1), 1–14. Retrieved November 25, 2015, from https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/861/1156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., Pea, R., & Rosen, J. (2010). Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: Mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information, 49(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljeström, A., Pöllänen, S., & Enkenberg, J. (2013a). Making learning whole: An instructional approach for mediating the practices of authentic science inquiries. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(1), 51–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljeström, A., Pöllänen, S., & Enkenberg, J. (2013b). The case of design-oriented pedagogy: What students’ digital video stories say about emerging learning ecosystems. Education and Information Technologies, 19(3), 583–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An overview. D. G. Oblinger (Ed.). Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3009.pdf

  • LPSR IM (Ministry of Education of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic). (1949). Pamatskolu programmas I–IV klasei [Elementary school subject syllabus for grades one to four]. Riga, Latvia: LVI. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LPSR IM (Ministry of Education of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic). (1955). Pamatskolu programmas 1955/56 mācību gadam: Rokdarbi [Subject syllabus for elementary education, school year 1955/56. Handicraft]. Riga, Latvia: LVI. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LPSR IM (Ministry of Education of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic). (1961). Praktisko darbu programma V–VII klasei [Subject syllabus for practical work for grades five to seven]. Riga, Latvia: LVI. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LPSR IM (Ministry of Education of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic). (1970). Darbmācības programma V–VIII klasei [Manual training subject syllabus for grades five to eight]. Riga, Latvia: Zvaigzne. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LPSR IM (Ministry of Education of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic). (1981). Darbmācības programma 1.–3. klasei [Manual training subject syllabus for grades one to three]. Riga, Latvia: Zvaigzne. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LPSR IM (Ministry of Education of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic). (1984). Darbmācības programmas 4.–8. klasei [Manual training subject syllabus for grades four to eight]. Riga, Latvia: Zvaigzne. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LR IM (Ministry of Education of the Republic of Latvia). (1992). Pamatizglītības standarts amatu mācībā [Standards of craft training for elementary education]. Riga, Latvia: LRIM. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LR IM MSD (Ministry of Education of the Republic of Latvia, Department of Learning Content). (1992). Mācību programma 10–12 klasei [Subject syllabus for grades ten to twelve]. Riga, Latvia: LRIM. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LR IZM ISEC (Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Latvia, Centre for the Content of Education and Examination). (1998). Mājturība: Pamatizglītības standarts [Handicraft and home economics. Standards for elementary education]. Riga, Latvia: ISEC. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LR TIM (Ministry of Folk Education of the Republic of Latvia). (1991). Mājturības programma 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • klasei [Subject syllabus for handicraft and home economics for grades five to nine]. Riga, Latvia: Zvaigzne. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • LTP (Ministry of Education of Latvia). (1925). Latvijas tautskolu programma [The subject syllabus for Latvian folk schools]. Riga, Latvia: LETA. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanen, P. (2012). Koulukäsityö vuosina 1866–2003: Kodin hyvinvointiin kasvattavista tavoitteista kohti elämänhallinnan taitoja [Handicrafts at school in 1866–2003. From household well-being toward life management skills] (Research, Ser. C, No. 344). Turku, Finland: University of Turku. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanen, P. (2014). Koulukäsityö naiseksi kasvattamassa [Craft education raising to be a woman]. Kasvatus & Aika, 8(1), 55–69. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2004). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 449–460). Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgalve, I., & Kļaviņa, A. (1998). Mājturības izglītība Latvijā [Home economics education in Latvia]. In G. Rudzītis (Ed.), Current Issues of Training in Home Economics (pp. 7–9). Jelgava, Latvia: LUA. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mind Tools. (2014). Creativity tools: Develop creative solutions to business problems. Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/main/newMN_CT.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • MK (Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia). (2014a). Informatīvais ziņojums “Par veiktajiem un perspektīvā plānotajiem pasākumiem kompetenču pieejā veidota valsts pamatizglītības satura izstrādē un ieviešanā” [Informative report: “On the existing and planned activities for the development and implementation of the state elementary education content based on a competences approach”]. Retrieved July 2, 2015, from http://tap.mk.gov.lv/mk/tap/?pid=4032896 (In Latvian)

  • MK (Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia). (2014b). Noteikumi par valsts pamatizglītības standartu, pamatizglītības mācību priekšmetu standartiem un pamatizglītības programmu paraugiem [Regulations regarding the national elementary education standard, elementary education subject standards, and examples of the elementary education syllabus]. Retrieved July 2, 2015, from http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=268342 (In Latvian).

  • Mäkelä, E. (2011). Slöjd som berättelse – Om skolungdom och estetiska perspektiv [Sloyd as narrative – On schoolchildren and esthetic perspectives] (Doktorsavhandling i Pedagogiskt arbete, No. 41). Institutionen for Estetiska Ämnen. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University. (In Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (2004). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OKM (Ministry of Education and Culture). (2013). Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön asetus yliopistojen koulutusvastuun täsmentämisestä, yliopistojen koulutusohjelmista ja erikoistumiskoulutuksista [Statute of the Ministry of Education and Culture on the ministerial amendment on the educational responsibility, degree programs, and specialization of universities] (Asetus, No. 1040/2013). Opetusja kulttuuriministeriö. Retrieved October 8, 2014, from www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2013/20131040 (In Finnish)

  • OPH (Finnish National Board of Education). (2004). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet [National core curriculum for elementary and lower-secondary education]. Retrieved January 31, 2004, from www.oph.fi/ops/perusopetus/pops_web.pdf (In Finnish)

  • OPH (Finnish National Board of Education). (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet [National core curriculum for elementary and lower-secondary education]. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf (In Finnish)

  • OPM (Ministry of Education). (1970). Peruskoulun opetussuunnitelmakomitean mietintö: Oppiaineiden opetussuunnitelmat [Report of the curriculum committee for the comprehensive school. Subjectspecific curricula] (Pt. 2, Komiteamietintö 1970, Ser. A, No. 5). Helsinki, Finland: Opetusministeriö. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (2001). The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation. Retrieved September 9, 2006, from http://www.ciera.org/library/archive/2001-04/0104prwn.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitto, L.-A. (2008). Arts education, the brain, and language. In C. Asbury & B. Rich (Eds.), Learning, Arts and the Brain (pp. 93–104). The Dana Consortium Report on Arts and Cognition. New York, NY: Dana Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöllänen, S. (2009). Contextualizing craft: Pedagogical models for craft education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(3), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöllänen, S. (2011). Beyond craft and art: A pedagogical model for craft as self-expression. International Journal of Education through Art, 7(3), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöllänen, S. (2015a). Kokonainen käsityöprosessi [The holistic process of craft]. Helsinki, Finland: Opetushallitus. Retrieved August 14, 2015, from http://www.edu.fi/perusopetus/kasityo/ops2016_tukimateriaalit/kasityoprosessi_perusopetuksessa (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöllänen, S. (2015b). Elements of crafts that enhance well-being: Textile craft makers’ descriptions of their leisure activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 58–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöllänen, S., & Kröger, T. (2000). Käsityön erilaiset merkitykset opetuksen perustana [The diverse definitions of craft as a basis for education]. In J. Enkenberg, P. Väisänen, & E. Savolainen (Eds.), Opettajatiedon kipinöitä: Kirjoituksia pedagogiikasta [Sparks of teacher knowledge. Writings on pedagogy] (pp. 233–253). Savonlinna, Finland: Savonlinnan opettajankoulutuslaitos. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöllänen, S., & Vartiainen, L. (2013). Forest-themed learning games as a context for learning by collaborative designing in crafts. Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science, 20(3), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, E. (2014). Play! Participatory learning and you! Annenberg Innovation Lab, School for Communications & Journalism. Retrieved November 25, 2015, from http://www.slideshare.net/ebreilly1/play-participatory-learning-and-you-37774072

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, E., & Literat, I., with Brennan, K., Felt, L., Garcia, A., Herr-Stephenson, … Vertabedian, V. (2012). Designing with teachers: Participatory approaches to professional development in education. Annenberg Innovation Lab, School for Communications & Journalism. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.slideshare.net/ebreilly1/designing-with-teachers-participatory-models-ofprofessional-development

  • Reincke, H. J. (1995). Slöjd: Die schwedische Arbeitserziehung in der internationalen Reformpedagogik [Sloyd: The Swedish labor education in the international reform pedagogy] (Europäische Hochschulschriften, Vol. 11). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. (In German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2013). The art & craft of science. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2011). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 231–300). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. (2011). Teaching Minds: How cognitive science can save our schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Pöllänen, S., Luutonen, M., Kaipainen, M., Kröger, T., Raunio, … Heinonen, A. (2007). Käsityötieteen ja käsityömuotoilun sekä teknologiakasvatuksen tutkimusohjelma Savonlinnan opettajankoulutuslaitoksessa [Research program in craft science and design, and technology education at the Savonlinna Department of Teacher Education] (Kasvatustieteiden tiedekunnan tutkimuksia, No. 100). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuun yliopisto. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M., & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative design: Technology-enhanced knowledge practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpanen, M.-R. (2003). Käsityönopetus suomalaiskouluissa 1800-luvulta nykypäiviin [Craft education in Finnish schools from the nineteenth century to the present]. In M.-R. Simpanen (Ed.), Lyhyt oppimäärä koulukäsityöhön (Suomen käsityön museon julkaisuja, No. 21, pp. 7–29). Jyväskylä, Finland: Suomen käsityön museo. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrjäläinen, E., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). The quality of design in 9th grade pupils’ designand-make assignments in craft education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 19(2), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new Culture of Learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urdziņa-Deruma, M. (2001). Tekstils kā mākslas izglītības sastāvdaļa topošo mājturības skolotāju studijās augstskolā [Textile as a part of art education in the studies of future teachers handicraft and home economics in higher education institutions]. Riga, Latvia: University of Latvia. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (1998). From context to contextualizing. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartiainen, H. (2014). Principles for Design-Oriented Pedagogy for Learning from and with Museum Objects (Publications of the University of Eastern Finland, Dissertations in Education, Humanities, and Theology, No. 60). Joensuu, Finland: University of Eastern Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeber, E., Syrjäläinen, E., & Lind, E. (2015). A discussion of the necessity of craft education in the 21st century. Techne Series, 22(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vītiņš, V. (1988). Strādātmācības izpratnes līkloči [Variation in the conception of work education]. Skolotāju Avīze, 11, 10. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • VN (Finnish Government). (1952). Kansakoulun opetussuunnitelmakomitean mietintö: Varsinaisen kansakoulun opetussuunnitelma [Elementary school curriculum committee report] (Pt. 2). Helsinki, Finland: Valtioneuvosto. (In Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Volāne, E. (1997). Rokdarbi kā skolēnu darba prasmju veidošanās līdzeklis sākumskolā [Craft as an instrument in the development of students’ work skills in elementary schools]. Riga, Latvia: Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Latvia. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žukovs, L. (1987). Darbmācības satura attīstības tendences Latvijas vispārizglītojošajās skolās [Tendencies in the development of manual training content in LSSR general schools]. In Mācību un audzināšanas satura attīstības galvenās tendences Latvijas PSR vispārizglītojošajā skolā [Tendencies of developing of the content of learning in LSSR general schools] (pp.72–89). Riga, Latvia: LPSR IM. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Žukovs, L., & Kopeloviča, A. (1997). Skolotāju izglītība un pedagoģiskā doma Latvijā [Teacher education and pedagogical thinking in Latvia]. Riga, Latvia: RaKa. (In Latvian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Sinikka Pöllänen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Māra Urdziņa-Deruma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Eastern Finland, Finland

    Eija Kimonen

  2. University of Jyväskylä, Finland

    Raimo Nevalainen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pöllänen, S., Urdziņa-Deruma, M. (2017). Future-Oriented Reform of Craft Education. In: Kimonen, E., Nevalainen, R. (eds) Reforming Teaching and Teacher Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_5

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-917-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation