PBL Curriculum Strategies

From Course Based PBL to a Systemic PBL Approach
  • Anette Kolmos


These words are formulated by Freire in Education for critical consciousness. We could formulate similar hypotheses: while all problem and project based learning (PBL) transitions involve change, not all PBL changes result in more comprehensive transition. If academic staff and students are not critically aware of the transition from a lecture-based curriculum to a problem and project based curriculum, contradictions increase between ways of knowing, acting and being in the traditional curriculum and an emerging curriculum.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ABET. (1995). A vision for change: A summary of the ABET/NSF industry workshops. Baltimore, MD: ABET, Inc. Retrieved from Scholar
  2. Barnett, R. (2009). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429–440. doi: 10.1080/03075070902771978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum in higher education (1st ed.). Maidenhead & New York, NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, J., Henriksen, L. B., & Kolmos, A. (2006). Engineering science, skills and bildung. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  5. Christensen, J., Henriksen, L. B., Kolmos, A., & Christensen, J. (2006). Engineering science, skills, and bildung. In A. Kolmos & A. Kolmos (Eds.), Engineering science, skills, and bildung (pp. 7–19). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  6. EURASHE. (2009). The Bologna process 2020 the European higher education area in the new decade. Brussels: European Association of Institutions in Higher Education (EURASHE). Retrieved from
  7. Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). The CDIO approach: Rethinking engineering education (pp. 11–45). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Graaf, E., & Kolmos, A. (2007). Management of change: Implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (1st ed.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., & Sorensen, C. D. (1997). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckel, P. D., & Kezar, A. (2003). Key strategies for making new institutional sense: Ingredients to higher education transformation. Higher Education Policy, 16(1), 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: Complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539–555. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2014.895703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EU Commission. (2008). Improving competences for the 21st century: An agenda for European cooperation on schools. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Jamison, A., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2014). Hybrid learning: An integrative approach to engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 253–273. doi: 10.1002/jee.20041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kezar, A. (2013). Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65, 761–780. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9575-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolmos, A. (1996). Reflections on project work and problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 141–148. Retrieved from Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anette Kolmos
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalborg Centre for PBL in Engineering Science and Sustainability under the auspices of UNESCOAalborg UniversityDenmark

Personalised recommendations