Abstract
This chapter is about how children’s drawings convey their level of conceptual understanding of organisms. Drawings are a useful pedagogical tool as a window to investigate children’s conceptual knowledge and the meanings they give to this form of expression. We analyzed the drawings collected from pupils living in rural areas, towns, and suburban areas in Brazil. Louv (2008) has written that young children may be out of touch with wildlife in developed countries. However, in every culture children can be seen as interested in living things, identifying, classifying, and seeking patterns, especially about animals (Tomkins & Tunnicliffe, 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge structure and function through drawings. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 375–386.
Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–18.
Angus, J. W. (1981). Children’s conceptions of the living world. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27(3), 65–68.
Ballas, B., & Monsen, J. L. (2014). Attention “blinks” differently for plants and animals. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 437–443.
Ballew, A. M. (1930). An analysis of biological drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 30(5), 490–497.
Bartoszeck, A. B., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Using drawings to investigate the concept of birds in the early years children in Southern Brazil. Emergent Science Newsletter, 4, 4.
Bartoszeck, A. B., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2012, Septmeber 17–21). Visualization of insects in the early years. European Research in Didactics in Biology 9th Conference, Berlin.(interactive poster).
Bartoszeck, A. B., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2013). What do early children think is inside a tree (extended abstract). Journal of Emergent Science, 5, 21–25.
Bartoszeck, A. B., Bartoszeck, A. C. de P. S., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Science literacy: The development of the concept of skeletons in Brazilian students. Educere- Revista da Educação, 8(1), 41–65.
Bartoszeck, A. B., Kruszielski, L., & Bartoszeck, F. K. (2011a). Science literacy: The point of view of student into understanding the internal anatomy of selected vertebrates. Educere-Revista da Educação, 11(1), 19–49.
Bartoszeck, A. B., Silva da, I. G. M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011b, September 5–9). Brazilian children’s concept of bird: An exploratory study. European Science Education Research Association 9th Conference, Lyon, France. (interactive poster)
Bartoszeck, A. B., Silva, B. R. da, Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2012). Children’s concept of insects by means of drawings in Brazil. Journal of Emergent Science, (2), 17–24.
Bartoszeck, A. B., Cosmo, C. R., Silva, B. R. da., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2014). Concepts of plants held by young Brazilian children: An exploratory study. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 105–117.
Bianchi, L. (2000). So what do you think a plant is? Primary Science Review, 61, 15–17.
Boas, F. (1955). Primitive art. New York, NY: Dover.
Bourassa, M. (1997). Le dessin, mieux comprendre pour mieux intervenir. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 38(2), 111–121.
Buchholz, D. (2000). Understanding the biological concept “bird”: A kindergarten case study (Doctor of Philosophy dissertation). Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Burt, C. (1922). Mental and scholastic tests (pp. 317–327). London: P.S. King and Son.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chang, N. (2012). The role of drawing in children’s construction of science concepts. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 187–193.
Chauvet, J.-M., Deschamps, E. B., & Hillaire, C. (Eds.). (1996). Dawn of art: The Chauvet Cave. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
Cinici, A. (2013). From caterpillar to butterfly: A window for looking into students’ ideas about life cycle and life forms of insects. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 84–95.
Cardoso, J. A., & Westphalen, C. M. (1986). Atlas histórico do Paraná. Curitiba: Livraria do Chain Editora (Historical atlas of Paraná State).
Cox, M. (2005). The pictorial world of a child (pp. 154–166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Day, M. H. (1970). The fossil man. New York, NY: Bantan Books.
Dempsey, B. C., & Betz, B. J. (2001). Biological drawing: A scientific tool for learning. The American Biology Teacher, 63(1), 271–279.
Diamond, J. (1992). The third chimpanzee: The evolution and future of the human animal (pp. 168–179). New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
Dunning, D. L., Holmes, J., & Gathercole, S. E. (2013). Does working memory training lead to generalized improvementsin children with low working memory? A randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, 16(6), 915–925.
Eliot, L. (1999). What’s going in in there? How the brain and mind develop in the first five years of life (pp. 260–289). New York, NY: Bantam Books.
Freeman, W. H., & Bracegirdle, B. (1976). An atlas of invertebrate structure. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Haene, E., & Aparicio, G. (2007). 100 trees of Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Albatros.
Hayes, D., & Symington, D. (1984). The satisfaction of young children with their representational drawings of natural phenomena. Research in Science Education, 14, 39–46.
Hayes, D., & Symington, D. (1988). Purpose achieved by drawing during science activities. Research in Science Education, 18, 104–111.
Hayes, D., Symington, D., & Martin, M. (1994). Drawing during science activity in the primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 16(3), 265–277.
Hitch, G. J., & Halliday, S. (1988). Visual working memory in young children. Memory & Cognition, 16(2), 120–132.
Hopperstad, M. H. (2008). When children make meaning through drawing and play. Visual Communication, 7(1), 77–96.
Hopperstad, M. H. (2010). Studying meaning in children’s drawings. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(4), 430–452.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). How is meaning mentally represented. International Social Science Journal, 115, 45–61.
Jung, C. G. (1962). Símbolos de transformación. Buenos Aires: Editora Paidós.
Jung, C. G. (1988). Essai d’ exploration de inconsciente (p. 181). Paris: Edition Denoel.
Kendric, M., & McKay, R. (2002). Uncovering literacy narratives through children’s drawings. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(1), 45–60.
Kleiner, F. S. (2011). Gardner’s art through the ages (pp. 15–23). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Knight, S. (2009). Forest schools and outdoor learning in the early years. London: Sage Publications.
Langevin, B. (2014). Comprender los dibujos de mi hijo. Barcelona: Ediciones Obelisco.
Leakey, R. E. (1981). The making of mankind. London: Sphere Books.
Legare, C. H., Zhu, L., & Wellman, H. M. (2013). Examining biological explanations in Chinese preschool children: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 13(1–2):67–93.
Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). The mind in the cave. London: Thames & Hudson.
Lorenzi, H. (2011). Árvores brasileiras: manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum (Trees from Brazil, identification guide).
Lourenção van Kolck, O. (1981). Interpretação psicológica de desenhos (pp. 115–119). São Paulo: Editora Pioneira (Psychological evaluation of drawings).
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. Chaptel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
Luquet, G.-H. (1923). Le réalisme dans l’art paléolitique. L’ Antropologie, 33, 17–48.
Luquet, G.-H. (1927/1979). Le dessin enfantin. Neuchâtel-Paris: Éditions Delachaux & Niestle`.
Malini, R. (2007). Effect of rubrics on enhancement of student learning. Educational Journal, 7(1), 3–17.
Manokore, V., & Reiss, M. J. (2003). Pupil’s drawings of what is inside themselves: A case stududy in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 28–43.
Manqueriapa, A., & Dariquebe, W. Q. (2009). Wanamey: Relato de la primeira generación Wachiperi. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos Bartolomé de Las Casas.
Morse, R. C. (1999). The involvement of working memory in children’s drawing development. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3), 1–8.
Oliveira, F. C. P. (2014). Abrigos com pinturas rupestres em Pirai da Serra, Paraná: uma abordagem geoarqueológica (pp. 107–296, Msc. Thesis). University of Paraná. (Rock art in Paraná: a geoarqueological approach).
Parellada, C. I. (2009). Arte rupestre of Paraná. Revista Científica da Faculdade de Arte do Paraná, 4(1), 1–25. (Prehistorical rock art of Paraná)
Parellada,, C. I., Oliveira, F. C. P., Sclvilzki, E. S. (2014). As pinturas rupestres do abrigo São José da Lagoa 2, X International Symposium on Rockart, Teresina, Piauí, Brasil, July, abstract, 1p. (Rock art in São Jose da Lagoa, Pirai do Sul, Brazil).
Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science and Educational Technology, 20(5), 630–642.
Patrick, P., Byrne, J., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Asunta, T., Carvalhgo, G., Havu-Nuutinen, S., & Tracan, R. (2013). Students (ages 6, 10, and 15 years) in six countries knowledge of animals. NorDina, 9(1), 18–32.
Pike, A. W., Hoffmann, D. L., Garcia-Diez, M., Pettitt, P. B., Alcolea, J., De Balbín, R., González-Sainz, C., de las Heras, C., Lasheras, J. A., Montes, R., & Zilhão, J. (2012). U-series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science, 336, 1409–1413.
Plotkin, H. (1997). Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge (pp. 179–227). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pooley, S. P., Mendelsohn, J. A., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2013). Hunting down the chimera of multiple disciplinary in conservation science. Conservation Biology, 28(1), 22–32.
Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Learning, 2, 509–522.
Prokop, P., Talarovicova, A., Camerik, A., & Peterkova, V. (2010). High school students’ atitude towards spiders: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Science Education, 32(12), 1665–1688.
Rapp, D. N. (2007). Mental models: Theoretical issues for visualization in science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education (pp. 43–60). Dordrecht: Springer.
Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1999). Conceptual development. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 13–16.
Righi, G. (1966). Invertebrados: A minhoca. São Paulo: IBECC. (Invertebrates: the earthworm).
Rioux, G. (1951). Dessin et structure mentale. Paris: Presses Universitaire.
Rybska, E., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Sajkowska, Z. A. (2014a). What’s inside a tree? The ideas of five year-old children. Journal of Emergent Science, 8, 7–15.
Rybska, E., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Sajkowska, Z. A. (2014b). Young children’s ideas about snail internal anatomy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6), 828–838.
Sanders, D. (2007). Making public the private life of plants: The contribution of informal learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1209–1228.
Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology, 14(1), 101–120.
Schwartz, M. L., Savegnani, L., & André, P. (2007). Representações da mata atlântica e da sua biodiversidade por meio de desenhos infantis. Ciência & Educação, 13(3), 369–388. (Representations of the Atlantic rainforest and its biodiversity through children’s drawings).
Spivey, N. (2005). How art made the world. London: BBC Books.
Staden, H. (2008). Duas viagens ao Brasil: primeiros registros sobre o Brasil (pp. 171–178). Porto Alegre: L & PM Editores (Two trips to Brazil).
Symington, D., Boundy, K., Radford, T., & Walton, J. (1981). Children’s drawing of natural phenomena. Research in Science Education, 11, 44–51.
Tomazic, I. (2011). Reported experiences enhance favourable atitudes toward toads. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Techology Education, 7(4), 253–262.
Tomkins, S., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Nature tables: Stimulating children’s interested in natural objects. Journal of Biological Education, 4(94), 150–155.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1999). What’s inside a tree. Primary Science & Technology Today, 11, 3–5.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2012). Visualisation of animals by children: how do they see birds. C. E. P. S. Journal, 1(4), 63–79.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2015). What’s inside an earthworm? The views of a class of English 7 year-old children. Journal of Emergent Science, (9), 44–48.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (1999a). Student’s understandings about animal skeletons. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1197–1200.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (1999b). Learning about skeletons and other organ systems of vertebrate animals. Science Education International, 10(1), 29–33.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (2000). Building a model of the environment: How do children see plants. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 172–177.
Van Driel, J. H. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1141–1153.
Vieira, C. O. F., Vieira, N. B. P., & Silva, W. M. V. (1968). Iniciação à Ciência-1. Rio de Janeiro: FENAME (Begginer’s science).
Villarroel, J. D., & Infante, G. (2014). Early understanding of the concept of living things: An examination of young children’s drawings of plant life. Journal of Biological Education, 48(3), 119–126.
Waehner, T. S. (1946). Interpretation of spontaneous drawings and paintings. General Psychological Monographs, 33, 3–70.
Wee, B. (2012). A cross-cultural exploration of children’s everyday ideas: Implications for science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 609–627.
Yang, H.-C., & Noel, A. M. (2006). The development characteristics of four- and five-year-old pre-schoolers drawing: An analysis of scribbles, placement paterns, emergent writing, and name writing in archived spontaneous drawing samples. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 6(2), 145–162. doi:10.1177/1468798406066442
Zoldosova, K., & Prokop, P. (2006). Education in the field influences children’s ideas and interest toward science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 304–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bartoszeck, A.B., Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2017). Development of Biological Literacy through Drawing Organisms. In: Katz, P. (eds) Drawing for Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-875-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-875-4_5
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-875-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)