Skip to main content

The Collaborative Process in Educators’ Self-Study of Practice

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Professional Learning ((PROFL))

Abstract

Our intention of connecting professional development with self-study of practice reflects the idea that educators benefit from various forms of knowledge, including formal and practical, which relate to the what and how of teaching (LaBoskey, 2004). Since self-study of practice is intended to improve upon one’s immediate practice (LaBoskey) and to align theory to practice (Loughran, 2007), the use of self-study seemed like an effective way to connect the educators’ professional development work with their change in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, J. (2009). Having hard conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P. W., Marsh, M., & Kramer, S. J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 418–431. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M., Wakeman, S. Y., Flowers, C., Rickleman, R. J., & Pugalee, D. (2007). Creating access to the general curriculum with links to grade-level content for students with significant cognitive disabilities: An explication of the concept. The Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Educating a profession for equitable practice. In. L. Darling-Hammond, J. French, & S. P. Garcia-Lopez (Eds.), Learning to teach for social justice (pp. 201–216). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The place of practical arguments in the education of teachers. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 23–42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallbraith, P., & Anstrom, K. (1995). Peer coaching: An effective staff development model for educators of linguistically and culturally diverse students. Directions in Language Education, 1(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. L., Richardson, V., Lloyd, C., Tidwell, D., Fenstermacher, G., & Anders, P. (1991). Staff development and changes in beliefs and practices. In V. Richardson & P. Anders (Eds.), Final report: Reading instruction study (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 655).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1998). An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, C. M., McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. M. (2007). Presumed competence reflected in the educational programs of students with IDD before and after the Beyond Access professional development intervention. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32(4), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuby, C. (2013). Critical literacy in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20. doi: 10.1177/0022487106296217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996, July 26). Studying research collaboration using coauthorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363–377. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 559–586. (Received 1992 Research Award, Division K, American Educational Research Association.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Showers, J., & Bruce, J. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41, 643–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, A., Tidwell, D., Edmister, E., & Garrett, J. (2014). Final report – Literacy, language and communication for individuals with severe disabilities: Reaching potentials through systemic and sustainable statewide professional development – Years 4 and 5 (Unpublished report). Cedar Falls, IA: Center for Disability Studies in Literacy, Language and Learning, University of Northern Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorn, A., McLeod, M., & Goldsmith, M. (2007). Peer coaching overview. Retrieved from http://www.marshallgoldsmithlibrary.com/docs/articles/Peer-Coaching-Overview.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, D. L., & Heston, M. I. (1998). Self-study through the use of practical argument. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 45–66). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, D. L., Heston, M. I., & Fitzgerald, L. M. (Eds.). (2009). Research methods for the self-study of practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, ‘How do I improve my practice?’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. (2010). The transformative potential of living theory educational research. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 3(1), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M, & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching, 13(2), 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tidwell, D., Staples, A. (2017). The Collaborative Process in Educators’ Self-Study of Practice. In: Dalmau, M.C., Guðjónsdóttir, H., Tidwell, D. (eds) Taking a Fresh Look at Education. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-869-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-869-3_6

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-869-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics