Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Edge?

Counter-Practice in Flexible Learning Programs

  • Chapter
Inclusive Education

Abstract

Flexible learning programs, as alternative education provision for marginalised young people, occupy a contentious position in inclusive education discourse. On the one hand, they offer young people otherwise excluded from mainstream schools the opportunity to complete their secondary school education in respectful learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2016). The process and product: Crafting community portraits with young people in flexible learning settings. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(3), 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A., & Plows, V. (2015). Re-presenting or representing young lives? Negotiating knowledge construction of and with ‘Vulnerable’ young people. In K. Te Riele & R. Gorur (Eds.), Interrogating conceptions of “vulnerable youth” in theory, policy and practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascia, N., & Maton, R. (2016). Teachers’ work and innovation in alternative schools. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, H. (2009). Resisting risk and rescue as the raison d’Être for arts interventions. In A. O’Brien & K. Donelan (Eds.), The arts and youth at risk: Global and local challenges. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. (1998). Michael White’s narrative therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20(4), 485–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training, Victoria. (2015, June). The education state. Consultation paper. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar-Smith, S., & Palmer, R. B. (2015). Building supportive school environments for alternative education youth. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(3), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For whom. Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1986). Frame analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. J., Van Bergen, P., & Sweller, N. (2016). Caught between a rock and a hard place: Disruptive boys’ views on mainstream and special schools in New South Wales, Australia. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 35–54. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1108209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2009). Re-engaging our kids: A framework for education provision to children and young people at risk of disengaging or disengaged from school. Melbourne: DEECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraftl, P. (2014). What are alternative education spaces – and why do they matter. Geography, 99(3), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia in 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2012). Alternative education sites and marginalised young people: ‘I wish there were more schools like this one’. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(8), 843–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, R., Gilfillan, G., & Gordon, J. (2013). Deep and persistent disadvantage in Australia. Canberra: Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/deep-persistent-disadvantage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2014). Re-engaging young people in education: Learning from alternative schools. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., McGregor, G., Hayes, D., & Te Riele, K. (2015). ‘Schools are for us’: The importance of distribution, recognition and representation to creating socially just schools. In K. Trimmer, A. Black, & S. Riddle (Eds.), Mainstreams, margins and the spaces in-between: New possibilities for education research. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., Brown, R., Heck, D., Pendergast, D., & Kansa, H. (2013). Professional identity pathways of educators in alternative schools: the utility of reflective practice groups for educator induction and professional learning. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 14(2), 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2011). The emotional geographies of neoliberal school reforms: Spaces of refuge and containment. Emotion, Space and Society, 4(3), 180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plows, V. (2012). Conflict and coexistence: Challenging interactions, expressions of agency and ways of relating in work with young people in the Minority World. Children’s Geographies, 10(4), 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plows, V., & Te Riele, K. (2016). Professional learning in flexible learning programs. Supporting staff to foster socially inclusive schooling. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plows, V., Bottrell, D., & Te Riele, K. (2016). Valued outcomes in the counter-spaces of alternative education programs: Success but on whose scale? Geographical Research. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12186

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2014). Classrooms of spatial justice: Counter-spaces and young men of color in a GED program. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(2), 110–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R., & Campano, G. (2013). Activist literacies: Teacher research as resistance to the “Normal Curve”. Journal of Language and Literacy Education [Online], 9(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school. Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Thomson, M. M. (2014). Alternative education programmes: Synthesis and psychological perspectives. Educational Psychology in Practice, 30(2), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J., & McInerney, P. (2013). Making ‘space’: Young people put at a disadvantage re-engaging with learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(1), 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Carlton: Melbourne University Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te Riele, K. (2014). Putting the jigsaw together: Flexible learning programs in Australia. Final report. Melbourne: The Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from http://dusseldorp.org.au/priorities/alternative-learning/jigsaw/

  • Tennant, M. (2005). Transforming selves. Journal of Transformative Education, 3(2), 102–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vadeboncoeur, J. (2009). Spaces of difference: The contradictions of alternative educational programs. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association, 45(3), 280–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1988, Winter). The process of questioning: A therapy of literary merit? Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1991). Deconstruction and therapy. Postmodernism and deconstruction in therapy. Dulwich Centre Newsletter, 3, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning College of Education, Victoria University, Australia

    Vicky Plows

  2. Victoria Institute for Education, Diversity and Lifelong Learning College of Education, Victoria University, Australia

    Alison Baker

Authors
  1. Vicky Plows
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alison Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University, Australia

    Vicky Plows

  2. Deakin University, Australia

    Ben Whitburn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plows, V., Baker, A. (2017). On the Edge?. In: Plows, V., Whitburn, B. (eds) Inclusive Education. Innovations and Controversies: Interrogating Educational Change. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-866-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-866-2_6

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-866-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation