Skip to main content

A Philosophical School for Our Time

Thinking with Plato after Dewey

  • Chapter
Book cover Schools in Transition
  • 514 Accesses

Abstract

Why indeed do we have schools? This perennial question has taken on new urgency in our era. As has been widely shown in the scholarly literature, governments the world over have been using educational policy to render schools ever more tightly into instruments of economic, nationalistic, and often xenophobic competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayers, W., Ayers, R., & Dohm, B. (2001). Zero tolerance: Resisting the drive for punishment in our schools. A handbook for parents, students, educators, and citizens. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, A. (1999). The idea of a university (after John Henry Newman). The Threepenny Review, 78, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1985a). Schools of tomorrow. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, the middle works 1899–1924: Vol. 8. Essays on education and politics 1915 (pp. 205–404). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1985b). Democracy and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, the middle works 1899–1924: Vol. 9. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1988). The public and its problems. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, the later works 1925–1953: Vol. 2. Essays, reviews, miscellany, and the public and its problems (pp. 235–372). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). Creative democracy – The task before us. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey, the later works 1925–1953: Vol. 14. Essays, reviews, and miscellany (pp. 224–230). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. W. (1983). The American scholar. In R. W. Emerson (Ed.), Essays & lectures (pp. 53–71). New York, NY: The Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, D. T. (2015, in press). Is education possible today? Teachers College Record.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, J. (2011). The history of “zero tolerance” in American public schooling. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, A. (1996). Beyond discipline: From compliance to community. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. (1992). Inside and outside the Republic. Phronesis, 37(2), 184–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. (1996). The Deleuzian fold of thought. In P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze: A critical reader (pp. 107–113). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in numbers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, C. D. C. (1992). Introduction. In Plato, Republic (G. M. A. Grube & C. D. C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1966). Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I. (1973). Reason and teaching. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sockett, H. (2012). Knowledge and virtue in teaching and learning: The primacy of dispositions. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, L. N. (1997). Dewey laboratory school: Lessons for today. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansen, D.T., Davis, J. (2016). A Philosophical School for Our Time. In: Siljander, P., Kontio, K., Pikkarainen, E. (eds) Schools in Transition. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-827-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-827-3_2

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-827-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics